It’s a lot of things. You’d be hard pressed to engineer a better swimming body, and he has the mental drive to take full advantage of it.
Hey pro tip if you want people to think your fantasy book isn’t just a derivative slurry, you should really name your world something other than Arda
Sorry but this chart is total garbage. The inconsistent proportions make it unclear at a glance whether one box is larger than another. This data is best visualized as a bar graph.
Those are rookie numbers, try 20 (I have a problem and own too many cups)
I feel like I saw this clip years ago, so based on that I think no? That’s not to say it’s real, tho
House centipedes are actually friends! They don’t eat your food, clothes, or house, nor spread disease, but they do eat all the little bugs that do those things.
It would be hugely impactful to the high levels of academic math, but I don’t think we’d see any meaningful effects elsewhere. Consistent or not, math works—it performs perfectly for finance, engineering, statistical analysis, and a finite but practically uncountable number of other things. Some abstruse inconsistency won’t suddenly break all that, and if it were discovered we would just keep on using the same “broken” math because it does the job.
is to concede that morality is just popular opinion
I believe the standard response here is: “so?”
Vulnerabilities.
I think this is in reference to the flood of AI slop “vulnerability fixes” spamming projects to farm bug bounties—if the vulnerabilities are disclosed in furry porn, security engineers are guaranteed to see them but bots might not.
Except that’s not what “using metric” means
see neil degrasse tyson’s
Text
And more text
Image
T