this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
419 points (79.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40751 readers
4278 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 194 points 1 month ago (9 children)

This is in fact incorrect: the right doesn't say corrupt government is the problem The right says trans kids and brown people are the problem. Because the right is dumb as a fucking brick, and the billionaires managed to brainwash the dumb right into hating someone other than themselves.

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The most terrifying words from in the English language are: "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."

Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.

-- Senile retired actor mouthpiece for the ultra-wealthy

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Senile retired actor mouthpiece for the ultra-wealthy

...who was voted in based on a single issue campaign. The anti-abortion-access movement convinced their flock that abortions were literally as bad as killing babies, and Falwell successfully created a voting block based on that one issue. That base didn't realize it came with massive deregulation, and they weren't smart or knowledgeable enough to care.

Reagan was the beginning of the end. I was fourteen when he was elected.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's an issue with definitions. When the right says the government is corrupt, they mean socially corrupt. When the left talks about the corrupt, they mean fiscally corrupt.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there's too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The right thinks that people are socially corrupt. Not the government. They think the government shouldn't enable that corruption. But when it comes down to it, they hate people. They don't hate institutions.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 9 points 1 month ago

The right wanting to eradicate minorities has nothing to do with fiscal corruption. It's just pure evil.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am declaring war on fat, gay kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know this is a shitpost, but I've seen people legitimately give this argument like it's a gotcha. It's like, okay? So if we get rid of the corrupt billionaires running the corrupt government, then the other corrupt billionaires will use their vast wealth to seize power for the billionaires again, so the problem is indeed the corrupt billionaires - we need to get rid of them all. It's like taking antibiotics - you can't stop when you start feeling better, you can only stop when you've gotten rid of the whole infection, or it'll just come back stronger.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

A system designed deliberately to incentivize greed will inevitably reproduce these exact circumstances, the greediest and least scrupulous always rise to the top

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

so…. then it’s the billionaires. got it.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

For real. Both sides guy is an idiot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

The left also thinks corrupt government is a problem

Meanwhile the right proudly advertises their love for corrupt billionaires

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Why does everyone always miss the point that Tyler Durden is a fucking fascist.

Really changes what this meme means.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's not a good person's identity, by any means. But he's not fascist.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

He wants to return to a glorified past that never existed by tearing down the current system, a return to where everyone is living off the land like early humans ("climbing the vines growing along the Sears tower"). He promotes the idea that men must return to being warriors, and something about the modern world has made them "weak." He promotes that such strength must be used to dominate, and claims it can be used to improve people's lives, as he claims with Raymond K. Hessel (whom Tyler threatens to murder if Hessel does not follow his dreams), despite the fact that Hessel is most likely left devastated with trauma and unable to move forward due to fear of being murdered. We never see Hessel's outcome, so Tyler gets to pretend he "helped" by completely traumatizing a person (reminds me of Trump bragging about "lifting people off of food stamps" when he actually kicked them off and made them more hungry, his followers don't see the outcome so they just believe the lie). Tyler captures the attention of disaffected, alienated young men and brings them under his wing to become part of their in-group, making them more likely to go along with extreme demands because now they have found family in Project Mayhem. He literally beats the living shit out of one of his men, destroying his pretty face, and yet still commands the respect of his men while disfiguring one of them potentially permanently. With Project Mayhem he intends to bring about his ideal world by force.

So we have numbers 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of Umberto Eco's 14 features of Ur-Fascism in Tyler and Project Mayhem, in my opinion.

But sure, he's not a fascist.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

Tyler Durden is not the good guy holy shit

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably the same people who thought RATM went political in the mid teens...

In 2007 I was in the passenger seat of my girlfriend's shitty Kia because I didn't have a car.

We stop at a stoplight and up next to us pulls up a shiny new blue Audi, and two fratbros with popped collars and sporting Oakleys.

Their speakers are on extremely loud and blasting System of a Down, specifically "Fuck the System."

I couldn't help but think "Man, I'm pretty sure these guys are the system."

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fun fact! The picture of the girl in this meme comes from this video, (relevant portion about 3 minutes in) in which she's by far the calmest and most reasonable person involved. She's not even angry, she just has kind of an expressive face, and she looks like that for all of exactly one frame

Some psycho combed through this video frame by frame to find the least flattering picture of her possible. Rightoids need to die out man

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I actually didn't know this. She really does seem like a sweet and friendly person. It's a shame she's being used as a symbol for crazy by the right, when she's actually the opposite.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I was just thinking, "what is that woman's story?" Glad to hear it isn't something like she was turned into a meme and whatever little mental health she had shattered, and now she spends all her time shut in her parent's basement. Thankfully, the real story isn't as dark as my imagination.

[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Ahh the 'enlightened centrist' take, how very boring.

[–] khanh@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

therefore, corrupt billionaires are the problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oascany@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

This has to be one of the most boomer out-of-touch I'm-a-cool-smart-guy memes I've seen on here, and that's saying something.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its not like that at all.

The left is saying billionaire are the problem. Their existence is a sign of corrupt system.

The right is saying all the left is corrupt. They don't mind their corrupt politicians.

Also everyone should go check how this left meme started. The lady in the picture was actually very calm and reasonable. Perfect metaphor for how the right manipulates the media into creating stories out of nothing.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Corrupt billionaires is redundant. You cannot have billionaires without a corrupting influence on government. Even if there were such a thing as a "good billionaire", it wouldn't justify the risks posed by all the bad ones.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Billionaires aren't corrupt, they're ethically bankrupt; they're the corrupt_ors_.
Government officials are corrupt because they've been corrupted by the billionaire corruptors.

Getting rid of the billionaires solves both problems at once.

It's always funny to me when people say to put the billionaires in charge, it's always just like

The farmer is doing a bad job because they just let the fox into the henhouse, so instead we should put the fox in charge of the henhouse. The fox is best suited for the job because they have a lot of experience with hens and they know all the problems with the henhouses.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The right elected the most corrupt government we have had so far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

So that would put you on the left.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was curious about what the site attached to the watermark was like: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-mind-unleashed/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Um no, that is not what the "left" thinks.

There are a lot of radically different "left wing" ideologies. The quote, you claim to be left wing could probably be attributed to social democrats, maybe socialists, although not really. And that quote doesn't really represent a good summary of what they believe.

I, for example am pretty far to the left, I am an anarchist. I believe, that all forms of unjust hierarchy are a bad thing, be it a companie's CEO or a government and I advocate for flat hierarchies and the organization of society via specialized assemblies. And of course the ownership of workers of the means of production.

So, I guess I would agree with your quote, as I am against exploitation from the government and from billionaires. I just think, that corruption is the wrong way to look at it. The way, capitalism is going right now is not corruption in the sense that is an "error" in the system. Nor is it the fault of individuals or a group of people. It's just that capitalism is set up in a way, that it naturally produces and needs these crisees, like faciasm to once again violently reinforce itself and live on. Capitalism will inevitaly lead to concentration of wealth and power, because of the power imbalance between worker and employer. And this leads to imbalances in power, which you could call corruption.

So, in summary, your statement could be considered leftist, as that is pretty close to what leftists believe. It's just that a lot of leftists go a bit further and analyze the issue on a systemic level rather than an individual one.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

/r/im14andthisisdeep

[–] 00xide@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is just acknowledging that the government wouldn't be corrupt without the billionaires. By the logic of your post, the left is correct and the right is not.

This stinks of "enlightened centrist" meme junk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The right in the US only says what their cult leader tells them to say. If he says the government is bad (which he often does when he's not the one running it), it's bad, but when he says it's good, (which he often does when he's the one running it) they say it's good.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Corrupt billionaires was the problem when it was a monarchy. It was a problem when they were plantation owners. It was a problem when they were railroad barons. It was a problem when they were automotive industrialists.

During Hoover, even the US people, who were taught to be terrified of communism knew that what we had wasn't working. FDR pushed the New Deal through as a last bastion of western capitalism, and at that very moment, the ownership class started working to roll all that back.

Curiously, billionaires can't seem to remember the whole thing about the social contract, that to keep the working class from burning it all down, you have to make sure they are compensated enough to survive. They're not doing that, and eventually too many people are going to have a grudge and would rather no system than this system.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Right, so the proper order of operations here is to get rid of the corrupt billionaires, so that we can clean up the corrupt government.

[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just read that the English government is considering a Law that forbids politicians to lie. I actually thought that was the whole starting point of politics but somewhere down the road clearly they must have noticed that no-one cared, so they finally made sure we'd care.

A lil disappointing on the progression charts of evolution, but hey! We now can move on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Read that again. Slowly.

load more comments
view more: next ›