An armed citizenry is not only successful by the amount of murderes of the correct people, the very fact the citizenry is armed changes the rate of a takeover, and has been successfully used by marginalized people in the past.
how meny atrocities proceeded the disarmament of the populous? why would you applaud the set up happening here?
the second amendment was to prevent tyrany. “but people do bad things with guns.” a tyrant moves to ban guns “this is a good thing, what a rare win for the tyrant…”
can only be the smartest take.
yes, put them all together in one place, in the open
because the ‘actors’ could not be verified they were of appropriate age, or if they had consented to being in mass distributed pronography. it was a needed change, which is why i think putting restriction on the access to porn is a bad idea, because only the closest thing to reputable sites will honor the demand, leaving only the skuzziest of options available
no more place holders. either they provide a candidate that runs progressive ideals or they can run the election without my vote
a whole bag of brussel sprouts. maybe with a hot dog and apple
if i want to get fancy, maybe hamburger soup, or green bean casserole
i’m not voting for him if he was the last candidate on earth
i don’t know, does this change anything?
they either were facetious to make… no point. or were earnest. either way
yea… most of the time the cost of rent is lower then there houses market rate, and it still didn’t change anything about artificially raising that said rate. you didn’t change anything about the problem at all!
the issue i see with being concerned that low supported groups would get more money then they would otherwise…is the point. the main reason other parties don’t have a presence is because they do not have the money to honestly present themselves. and we are talking reach here, if they are given equal reach, and what they say is agreed to by more people, then it turns out that they didn’t have minimal support, they were being quashed by special interests
it’s not because they are trying to spread awareness. now obviously not all blah blah blah., but they have a tendency to be highly sanctimonious and abrasive, they accept no partial measures and treat it like like a cult would in the eve of the coolaid tasting party.
kind hard to see their point of view in the other end of a carnist label spat at you.