this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
20 points (95.5% liked)

movies

3522 readers
369 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 1 points 56 minutes ago

Starring Mark Wahlberg.

The only exception is The Other Guys.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

It opens with a talking head news reporter monologuing a voiceover of some bullshit

[–] PillBugTheGreat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Trailer blitzes

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

This is a very lazy observation, but for a US production, if it’s released in the US first it’s often a sign they’re trying to get the opening weekend without many reviews available to dissuade attendance.

If it’s actually a good film, it’ll open in a foreign region a week or two before the US so they can use those reviews in promotion.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wow first one to say Jared Leto.

Unless I've missed morbin time suddenly becoming popular?

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 24 minutes ago

Bladerunner 2049 is great. In that, he plays a self-absorbed sadistic rich asshole. Phenomenal casting if you ask me.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago

More than five 'executive producers.'

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Two character immediately infordumping to each other as if that’s how humans normally communicate.

“Are you ready? This is going to be a hard job. As you know, they’ve tightened security but we got a man on the inside. As long as does his job then it’s smooth sailing.”

“I was born ready. Eveeything will be fine as long as the shipment is on time. As you know, we put a tracker on the lead car and I can watch exactly where it is from this device in real-time.”

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Two character immediately infordumping to each other as if that’s how humans normally communicate.

How dare you besmirch The Princess Bride!

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Compare this to the bank robbery opening in Dark Knight haha.

I've never seen Heat, but I've also never seen any newer movies top that scene since.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Heat is as good as people have been telling you.

There's also a novel, Heat 2, written by the movie's director that serves as a prequel and sequel.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 minutes ago

And I hear soon there is Heat 2 the movie

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 hours ago

Directed by JJ Abrams

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately for too long now: “A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far Far Away”

Directed by:

  • Uwe Boll
  • Michael Bay

If you see this logo:

The company is the king of what used to be called Direct To Video. Now it is all Direct to Streaming.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 hours ago

Only if it's a Happy Gilmore production. If he's acting in someone else's movie, he can be a great actor.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago

Ehhh..... "Spaceman" was pretty good actually

[–] Senal@programming.dev 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

these logo's:

Though i will say the production value on the latest daily wire show was really high, probably the absolute fuck-tonne of money they spent on it.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What the hell is Angel. I am seeing that company logo all over. Are they a distribution house or are they some sort of religious shit?

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago

I think they are kind of like a production house with an additional kickstarter backing thing, or small individual investors of some other kind, i'm not sure.

Here is the wiki

Their programming is pretty faithy, have a look at the lineup and you'll see from the titles.

I don't care much for that genre, but i don't see it as that much different than any other genre, it's just not for me.

What i will say is that their productions are the faith based equivalent of straight to vhs action movies.

It's generic dross with meh writing and some reasonable production values.

but that's just my opinion, perhaps it's worth a shot if you're into that kind of genre.

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oversaturated marketing campaign and overly bloated cast are the two big red flags for me.

Both are indicative that the budget for the movie was not put towards the actual content of the film but about trying to pull in the largest demographics of people.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 11 hours ago

bloated cast are the two big red flags for me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RWsI8BUkWc

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 9 hours ago

A lot of directors and actors/actresses are massive red flags based on the projects that they take on. If they are also working with a star studded cast then it is going to suck so much. The Rock and Chris Pratt have earned their current association with bland movies that suck for example. I still like some older Rock movies from before he became bland action hero who can't show weakness for any reason. Pratt is fun as Starlord, but his other roles are mediocre.

Bland marketing is often a bad sign, where it is hard to tell the thing is different than a bunch of other similar movies. Bland action movies are a great example of this, if they can't pull of a unique impression from the trailers it is most likely going to suck.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Detailed CGI in sci fi that's been lense or motioned blurred into oblivion.

Doesn't even matter if the CGI was subpar because now the whole thing looks like RGB vommit.

It's especially painful coming from gaming where you get to see crisp visual quality at every angle even on games as old as Halo CE.

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If it's a movie about a woman and it's written and directed by a man

[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] yessikg@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

There are always exceptions but 99% of the time the movie ends up being misogynistic garbage

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 12 hours ago

If it's a comedy: the first joke.

But there's always exceptions to any rule. I recently watched Spaceballs (yes, first time) and it would normally fall under that rule (for me, don't hate), but it got increasingly better as it went along.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 3 points 9 hours ago

Pacing that feels more like an Instagram reel than a feature film.

Excessive use of poor effects or artificial camera shake.

[–] B0NK3RS@lazysoci.al 3 points 10 hours ago
  • Camera cuts

It sucks for me because once they start with the unnecessary cuts it pulls me right out and I'll probably stop watching.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Promoted in media, then suddenly disappears and not heard of again for 4-8 months.

It went horribly with test audiences, then got sent for a focus-group-based reworking. Always trash.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

Typically things I look for are a movie that's pushed like its a big budget film but doesn't have any actors I've ever heard of.

Too much expositional dialogue at the beginning of the movie especially when its so foreign to the way people talk in real life.

In the new Star Wars movie, the "can you hear me now?" "joke" in the first 5 minutes.

Unnecessary sequels to a completed story.

I'm sure there are others but my break is over and this is all I could think of.

[–] schroedingersKoala@piefed.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

Directed by: Uwe Boll

[–] Janx@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago

For comedies, none of the jokes in the trailer are that funny or make you laugh.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Typically the impression I get from the trailer. I have seen so many trailers and so many movies I usually can't even tell you why anymore.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 2 points 11 hours ago
[–] buliarous@piefed.social 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

exposition in the form of character monologue at a length longer than 30 seconds that is required for the rest of the movie to make sense.

[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

I'd say any bad exposition, no matter how short. I was marginally interested in watching Shang-Chi after watching Wonder Man since I heard Trevor was in it too.

Right after the intro sequence, they jump to the present to introduce him and his friend and she immediately says something like "we've been friends for 10 years" and it was just so forced that I turned it off.