It's the same as the sports stuff. The true bigots have realized these are wedge issues they can use to get people who aren't openly bigoted to say "well they have some good points". They aren't good points but a surface-level look from someone who doesn't care that much will see some validity in it. That opens the door for ever more aggressive policies.
JillyB
That's a really well done project!
Or gone to smash tournaments. Luckily the weekly I run doesn't have a lot of stinkers but there have been a few over the years.
I shouldn't engage but I can't resist. The difference is thats what mods are for. They ban problematic users and there's modlogs for transparency. There are power-tripping mods that are trigger happy with the ban, but it is up to them to do that.
Tesseract is an app which claims to access the fediverse. It doesn't tell you what's being censored or even that things are being censored. It presents them as technical issues. It's not an apples to apples comparison.
Contrapositive? I never learned about those. In health they told us only abstinence works
Nintendo are excellent marksmen when it comes to their customer's dicks. They have been for a long time. -smash competitor
The real AI model was the friends we made along the way!
I typed this out as a joke but it kind of hits, actually.
That's a very flippant, holier-than-thou attitude. "It's fine to scam people out of their life savings. They shouldn't have been scammed". Pure victim blaming mindset.
Most people don't control where their pension funds are invested. Responsible retirement plans that invest in index funds will also be affected without anybody specifically choosing to invest in SpaceX. And even if they did, it's still not ok to pump and dump other people's money.
Not even that. If a revolution overthrows a US-backed dictator, they will still be labeled a terrorist group after they are victorious.
The nominal definition is a person or group that uses violence to achieve political goals. By that definition, the US military, George Washington, and all US backed coup leaders are terrorists. Of course, the US would never call them that because it would expose the contradiction. It is and has always been selectively applied to America's enemies.
There's another aspect to this. The AUMF gave the president complete military control with no restrictions to fight the "War on Terror". So when Maduro and the random boats in the Caribbean were labeled "narco-terrorists" it was to give a flimsy justification for the president to use the military however he wanted.
"Terrorist" can mean freedom fighter. It can mean revolutionary. It can mean political rival. It can mean peaceful people with the wrong political beliefs. It can just mean fisherman. But it has never had a definition that has been consistently applied because that's not what it's for.
I really wanna make some pico de gallo though...
I used to date a girl that worked at a theater. She was always coming home with trash bags filled with popcorn. It was basically free to make so they could have as much as they want.