this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
63 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3481 readers
536 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SargonOfACAB@slrpnk.net 49 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Well, yeah. They don't really go anywhere and they don't have anything to say.

I just rewatched the prequels. Sure, they can be criticized but they do tell a rather cohesive story about a dying democracy's inability to deal with emergent totalitarianism, while also exploring Anakin Skywalker as a character.

The new trilogy starts with ideas that might be interesting to investigate but then completely fails to do so.

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 5 points 9 hours ago

The dialogue is the problem with the Prequels. It looks good, the stories track and all nearly fit into the wider Star Wars universe, it's just that George Lucas has no idea how actual humans communicate. There was also an absolute tsunami of 3rd party content around the Prequels from comics, video games, YA novels, TV shows, and toys that cemented the Prequels into the cultural Zeitgeist that Disney was completely unable to replicate.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

"a rather cohesive story about a dying democracy's inability to deal with emergent totalitarianism"

Which is why the Prequel Trilogy regained popularity given the horrors we're living through.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The Prequels were during Bush II's wars. They were relevant then as well.

[–] fascicle@leminal.space 16 points 12 hours ago

Plus Darth Maul is awesome

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Another problem with the sequel trilogy is the few things they did try to explore were already done better by the existing films. The other trilogies really hammered home the flaws of the Jedi order. Rich people play both sides, just like the Lando.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 51 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

7: Mystery box/A New Hope again

8: Controversial character assassination but honestly the only one with any real value cinematically

9: Cowardly trash with no payoff for the mystery boxes that also discarded every point of value from 8

I wonder why. Fuckers couldn't even figure out they should have made the Knights of Ren matter as villains.

[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

Honestly 8 has no value cinematically either. It is just as much a mystery box that "could" go somewhere as 7. It has nothing interesting to say or deconstruct about Star Wars, it's just "what if all of that was bullshit?" What do you mean what if? My brother in Christ, you are writing the movie, you are supposed to tell or imply that in the story. The character assassination is just an extention of that. "What if this character acted completely different now?" Ok let's pretend I'm fine with that. Why? What are you trying to say with that? What happens as a result of the change? Oh, no reason, nothing, and nothing? K then. KOTOR 2 was leaps and bounds better at deconstructing Star Wars, and it was notoriously unfinished. It's not a high bar, and Star Wars IS bullshit in some ways, as much as I like some of them. So it would have been cool if Johnson gave a shit.

Yoda's line about Masters is the only thing that stuck with me in the whole Trilogy though, so I guess you are technically correct. But it's like 1% value vs 0% value.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I remember starting 9 in the theater, excited to see how Star Wars ends!

Then the movie happened, and I just couldn't shake the feeling of "oh so JJ is pissed that Rian did his own thing with the last movie, and we're literally just going around retconning the very previous movie?"

ETA: I actually laughed out loud when they tried to invite Rose on their little adventure again and she's just like "nah, I gotta stay here"

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 17 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

...or any villain besides Temu Darth Vader and (sigh) The Emperor II, zombie boogaloo

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I understand the thematic purpose of Kylo, he's supposed to be the edgy wannabe Nazi, it's a commentary and so on and so forth.

Probably shouldn't have used your female lead as a sexual reward for the redemption arc of the Neonazi incel though. Bro literally negged her and abused her...

Kind of makes you think any female empowerment message spread by Disney is a mere marketing decision or something.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Temu Darth Vader

😂

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

I feel like the problem with 8 was how ham-fisted it was. Like, I get wanting to break the norms, go a different direction, and not rely on nostalgia to direct your story. But maybe taking what everyone loved from the first movies, going "actually all this stuff you loved is SHIT and you were stupid for ever liking it" and then literally burning it all in front of everyone was the wrong way to go about that.

It felt like the writer held some deep seeded hatred for Star Wars and its fans, and went out of their way to make that known.

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 9 points 10 hours ago

It's not saying "you are stupid for ever liking it", but a lot of old star wars fans are taking it that way. Not everything is a personal attack.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The person you’re referring to is JJ Abrams. JJ Abrams thinks he knows everything about movies and doesn’t need to know anything about the source material, it’s a fairly well documented fact that he was neither a Star Trek fan nor a Star Wars fan before making either movies. I have so many problems with JJ Abrams going all the way back to Lost and I don’t think I will ever forgive him for ruining two of my favorite franchises and TV storytelling for the time being.

[–] aGlassDarkly@piefed.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I thought this was the one he didn’t do.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

On 8? He was the executive producer.

[–] aGlassDarkly@piefed.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Admittedly, I’ve never actually known what an executive producer does.

[–] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago

What were the things you liked they shit on?

[–] fascicle@leminal.space 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I got as far as them using their hyperspace to launch a small ship and destroy the bigger ship, like why don't they just make a ton of dummy ships and blow everything up that way, would have taken out the death star so easily.

It was cool to see but right after that's all I could think about, like why even bother building a death star, just hyper launch things all over the place

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Smacking one ship into the other creates a large debris field with unknown vectors. Allowing debris to enter a hyperspace window is dangerous according to the laws of physics that I just made up.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

That's literally the explanation given for why there's a chunk of Death Star on that one planet in 9.

I'm not even kidding.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 4 points 10 hours ago

a ton of dummy ships

We usually call those missiles. :P

You've reminded me of a bit of flavor text from Starsector that I particularly like, from the missile specialization skill:

My colleagues don't appreciate their whimsy. You get all these little spaceships and you break all the rules 'cause they don't need to survive landing.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

9 made me so angry.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

7, 8, & 9 were mid movies because they were produced by people who do not understand the franchise or what the lore/world permits. And movie 9 was such a hack job that I'm shocked there weren't Alan Smithee credits.

9 is objectively a bad movie. The big bad reappears off screen and it's handwaved with "somehow". Fuck that movie. Literally the worst one by a long shot. Absolute garbage.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago

I'll never understand why, when they brought the original trio of actors back and one of them sadly passed away, they decided to kill off the two living ones and keep the one who died in all three movies as increasingly weird stock footage.

[–] axeln@norden.social 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

@ChicoSuave @movies I liked 7, actually, but was really disappointed by 8 throwing the build-up away again and 9 was just a mess, cleaning up nothing at all.

[–] charokol@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I liked 7 at the time, but it’s been retroactively ruined by the whole package

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I liked 7 when it came out and was excited by where the story and characters were going. Then I was very disappointed by 8, and didn't even bother watching 9 when I heard what a train wreck it was. And I consider myself to be a hardcore SW nerd.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 19 points 14 hours ago

IMO they should pretend they never made those 3 steamers and try again. Full retcon.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 14 points 13 hours ago

Give me more movies about trade disputes!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Needed more midichlorians.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I watched the first one and it seriously sucked. Just way too many cameos, I felt like I was watching a revival episode of some 90s comedy. It could have had a laugh track and it wouldn't of felt out of place.

I didn't even bother witb the the next ones.

So many direction they could of gone with but they decided to treat the franchise like Noem treats her pets.

Disney killed all my fan energy. Never trust the mouse.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

I actually didn't mind the second one. They tried to do something different and it didn't really work, but I appreciated the attempt at least. The third one is incomprehensible trash.

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 7 points 14 hours ago
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This was recently posted in the science fiction instance and i will post the same thing I posted there.

The first two-thirds or so of The Force Awakens was pretty good. All after was utter dogshit.

I will always remember the line that stopped 7 in it's tracks. Them deciding their plan of attack on Starkiller.

What about the shields?

We'll disable the shields.

Oh. Okay. Thanks han that sounds like a super duper plan. Yes, master smuggler and their in sure infiltrating the first order's most top secret facility that's brand new in every way will have a button that says disable shields. What a lazy line.

Compare that to "many bothans died bringing us these plans". You know, actual stakes.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 11 hours ago

I agree. It hook you in the beginning, then tosses ideas around... and nothing happens