SargonOfACAB

We've had predictive text and automation of boilerplate code for years without needing any generative AI.

Hostility towards what is now colloquially called AI seems very justified to me. The costs to society, especially the environmental ones, can't be justified by the meagre "benefits" it purports to offer.

The biggest boons of generative AI I've see its champions mention (other than making horrifying imagery that makes someone feel like an artist with zero art involved) are cost-reduction and automating the "boring" parts.

The cost-reduction seems unsustainable and mostly exists because these companies are operating at an enormous loss. A lot of the automation already existed and those "boring" tasks where also opportunities for junior coders to learn their trade.

It doesn't respond to what's going on around me, but bone-conduction headphones do help me stay focused and can be used when interacting with others if you don't make the music too loud.

Even just very small and temporary ones would do a lot, in my opinion.

Part of what makes direct action valuable is that it temporarily creates a space for just doing what needs doing, with less regard to the reality of capitalism and the state.

I should probably take some time to think why my instagram feed is full of non-binary people, shouldn't I?

It's probably dangerous to think this is just any one thing. For the vast majority of people it's likely just a form of normalization. If you've been involved with anarchism (or other radical politics) for a while it can be hard to remember just how normalized state repression or even state violence is. Similar to "capitalist realism" people just aren't used to imagining that things could be differently. Addressing that would involve both arguing that certain things (such as police defaulting to violence) shouldn't be considered as normal, while also presenting viable alternatives that we could be doing right now. For that last part I think the concept of prefigurative politics plays a big role.

I'd perhaps cautiously suggest that some sort of "learned helplessness" or a variation thereof could also be at play. When you lack agency and bad outcomes seem to happen regardless of what you do, many people will just passively accept the bad outcomes. Here I think people should be shown that through community and agency you can create positive outcomes. Getting people even tangentially involved in any form of direct action has been (in my experience) a good way to make that happen. It is, however, rather challenging to get people to take that step. Telling them about (successful) forms of direct action will be necessary here. Someone I know recently had the realization that direct action can have a much bigger impact than they thought after watching the documentary "To Kill A War Machine."

Most people also just don't have the necessary handholds to think about all of this. The necessity of a government or the continued existence of capitalism is taken as a given, the same as gravity or magnetism. A lot of effort gets put into making sure this is the case and most people don't have the time, energy, or inclination to look into it much deeper.

they should obey Aerion over Egg, but Aerion is such an PITA that they wait for a tie breaker from someone who has even more seniority: Maekar or Baelor.

That's how I interpreted it while watching. The guards were given orders they disagreed with so when they saw an opportunity to disobey they took it.

My local anarchist collective has already decided to donate and is currently looking at how we can do additional fundraising.