Games

No no no, that's not how we do critique of art. You have to look at wether or not something like a capitalist is depicted with any positive qualities. For example Wonder Woman is bad because it has a CIA agent in it.

More seriously I do think there is a discussion about art and artist being separate, but it's not one I feel competent enough to have. Harry Potter isn't bad because J. K Rowling sucks. The Louis CK tv series isn't bad because Louis is a piece of shit who assaults women (though that knowledge has made the series shift from comedy to a horror in a lot of scenes).
Fifth element has a lot that can be critiqued, like the whole "Born Sexy Yesterday" trope.
But art and artist is connected, so even though the art itself might be fine enough, there can still be reason to avoid it because of the artist - Fifth Element because of who directed it; whatever ZA/UM shits out because of what they did; a third example that makes you think I'm really smart; a fourth example that makes you think I didn't get it at all; and so on.

Was this just a whole lot of nothing, or did I say something?

Anything is possible, chuds love starship troopers and jarhead. I'm personally a bit of a Richard III was misunderstood-weirdo.

Edit: I seriously dream of seeing a version of Richard III that focuses in on his body dysmorphia, his weird misogyny and how his mother has hated him from birth (maybe, there's so many ways to read their relationship. The way she talks to him at the end, the way she mistrusts him... Was it always like this, or is it a result of his actions? What came first?)
There's some cool Norman Bates story there. The guy is physically capable enough to be a great warrior, he can seduce the widow of a man he killed, yet he's apparently so ugly that no woman could ever love him - even just physically. Despite the fact he's rich as fuck and brother to the king.
He's charming as hell, but says noone could be his friend. He's a great administrator, but talks about how he couldn't be. There's such an interesting thing going on with him, and I've never seen it dealt with in a way that scratched the itch. The Ian McKellen movie is great, but he's a villain there, not some sad creature or abandoned kid, which I think he could be. That play is so good.

I haven't done the fascist playthrough, but I heard Kim ends that quest by telling you that you're fucking stupid, which is good enough. He's not gonna drop the case because his temporary partner turns out to be facist, and if he decides to trust you anyway, that's probably by you being good otherwise.

Same with rolling his eyes over you becoming racist, but, at least you are helpful? Better than the unhelpful racist.

Shooting Cunoesse is stupid, and could be meant as Kim also being a bastard cop in the end (more than bribes), but I'm blaming the game railroading him into being with you, since he's crucial.

But not really past the point of what you get from a lot of copaganda.

Columbo is goated.

so about that new harry potter show...

The issue with harry potter isn't it's content, but its production as far as I understand it. The content of Harry Potter is average libshit, it's all the surrounding stuff that has made harry potter be more than just media consumption.

People hate harry potter because jk Rowling spends the money it earns on oppressing trans people and explicitly says that the popularity of harry potter shows that she's right to do so, not because it's lib slop.

Dont you dare drag Columbo down with Law and Order. Columbo is absolutely fantastic. Columbo somehow got a job where he only investigates murders where the suspect is rich and then defeats them by being overwhelmingly working class at them until they break down