this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21303 readers
166 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here

- No gamers allowed

- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review.

- Can't read Colon Syntax Emoji? :skill-issue:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Actually, Fifth Element is bad because it was directed by a pedophile who multiple women have accused of SA.
No no no, that's not how we do critique of art. You have to look at wether or not something like a capitalist is depicted with any positive qualities. For example Wonder Woman is bad because it has a CIA agent in it.
More seriously I do think there is a discussion about art and artist being separate, but it's not one I feel competent enough to have. Harry Potter isn't bad because J. K Rowling sucks. The Louis CK tv series isn't bad because Louis is a piece of shit who assaults women (though that knowledge has made the series shift from comedy to a horror in a lot of scenes).
Fifth element has a lot that can be critiqued, like the whole "Born Sexy Yesterday" trope.
But art and artist is connected, so even though the art itself might be fine enough, there can still be reason to avoid it because of the artist - Fifth Element because of who directed it; whatever ZA/UM shits out because of what they did; a third example that makes you think I'm really smart; a fourth example that makes you think I didn't get it at all; and so on.
Was this just a whole lot of nothing, or did I say something?