this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
214 points (96.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38654 readers
3745 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Now with its own dedicated hardware: the SPU (Slop Processing Unit)

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 3 points 8 hours ago

Apparently you need a second RTX 5090 dedicated just to slopification duty

[–] mr_eckneim@feddit.org 12 points 16 hours ago

Looks like they trained their stuff on instagram posts tbh

[–] BiomedOtaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 hours ago

Where can I post this ? Seriously I would love nvidia to see this.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 17 hours ago

And I am fascinated by the number of people who, after all those years, still have no idea how DLSS and neural networks work.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Guess they didn't realize games have an art style.

Tampering with that by making all games look the same is destructive to the graphic art style.

Booo It's bad Boooooo

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

It's like putting ketchup on a hamburger! If the chef wanted you to have ketchup, he would have put it on there himself. You're spitting in his face by making changes to accommodate your personal preferences. One size fits all!

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's a bit different.

It's more like changing a human made painting with AI to make the person look like modern IG "models".

I think it's fine to add condiments to food. That's not really the same as painting over real human art , with AI slop.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 8 hours ago

Is DLSS 5 a hard requirement to play the game? If not the condiment comparison is apt.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago

Ah, using modern Photoshop to look like fake people, tale as old as time. It is kinda funny that in showing that ai is crap, you showed that humans are crap too.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

That's like saying "you shouldn't mod games, 'cause that's not what the dev intended". Idgaf what the dev/chef intended, if I like mods in my burger, I'm gonna season it to my liking.

You can dislike what this dlss5 is doing all you want to, but in the end, no one is forcing you to actually use it. Sure, some devs will start to rely on it, but those same devs never gave half a shit about what their burger tasted like in the first place. They're the equivolent of a McDonalds burger. The devs who won't rely on this, and who have a vision for their artstyle won't be affected from this, in the same way that indie devs aren't affected by the newest call of duty.

The devs who give a shit aren't gonna be forced to even make this available in their games. DLSS has always been a choice, if the chef doesn't want me to put ketchup in their game, they shouldn't offer it by putting the ketchup on the table in the first place.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

It reminds me more of that old meme of "if Mona Lisa was painted today".

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 day ago
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 2 points 14 hours ago

No thx. I’m not too big on the last few generations of gaming anyway but if they’re really going to push their slop like this I’m out fully.

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It is too... clean? The lighting is too "perfect". Each object is an idea rather than an image to be interpreted. It conforms to what instagram considers to be realistic.

This is a mirror of human delusion averaged and contorted to gaze into itself, and as such I abhor it.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago

This video has a neat fhowcase of what's going on here. So-called "AI" adds detail where there should be none, which makes the faces look like worn-out, but polished leather.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] krisevol@lemmus.org -5 points 9 hours ago

No way. Nvidia is currently the only gpu that do utilize 1440p 500hz oled monitors. Dlss4. 5 is a have charger for high refresh gaming.

[–] purrtastic@lemmy.nz 11 points 22 hours ago (4 children)
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah sure it looks more "real" but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.

I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It looks impressive and bad at the same time to me

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Im a console player so the background in the Skyrim clip looked impressive to me, but everything else looked really weird and boring even though it 'technically' looked better to me

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago

How is the removal of shadows considered to be better lighting in any way?

[–] idealotus@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Ehhhh. I saw the text ("The Real Deal" poster on the window in one comparison). There's still some artifacting, which to me is a deal breaker, especially if I have to DLSS everything instead of selected items.

But I'm also not a game developer, so I don't know if the modeling differences are worth the tradeoff for something that most people won't see in motion.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org -3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I actually love DLSS 4.5. no other method or gpu can do 1440p 500fps to run my oled monitor, but DLSS4. 5 can and it runs and plays amazing. I won't go back to 144hz just to play native if i have a choice to do 500fps dlss.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I think you might be experiencing a bit of a placebo effect with a framerate of over 240. Pretty much anything after that has significantly diminished returns for the compute requirements.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm not. I have my 500hz oled as my main monitor next to a 280hz lcd. Big difference. 500fps gaming is crazy good.

[–] TurboToad@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

At least for competitive games the better motion clarity of 240+ FPS clearly noticeable.

But then again its questionable whether generating those frames with DLSS has any kind of competitive advantage.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like this is a case of "My $80 platinum plated monster 3.5mm audio cable gives so much better music quality."

[–] TurboToad@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

As I said it strongly depends on what you do with it. One of my main hobbies is aim training and there the difference is clearly noticeable. And there are many trustworthy voices in the aim training community that back this up. It's also noteworthy that other factors of the monitor impact motion clarity more than just the refresh rate. For example an OLED panel has way better motion clarity than IPS panels.

But in the end stuff like this obviously won't give you superpowers. You have to train to actually get gud.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

I hate how bad NVIDIA has to be in general, because DLSS is legitimately amazing technology. Even the frame gen in DLSS 4 that was pretty rough at first is shockingly good in Borderlands 4 for example. Too bad they're the reason no one can buy RAM

[–] dellhiver@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Was watching the Digital Foundry review of this tech. They seemed impressed, the people in the comments were scathing

Everyday I think things can't get worse. That maybe this will be the breaking point. But no.

The main Resident Evil example is just awful. It's like an Instagram filter.

It's worse than that guy who has been going around photoshopping "Ugly" female game characters to make them look hotter.

I hate this reality.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget that when Sony went back and did the HD remaster, they actually remodeled her that way.

All of the worst people are winning.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

Jesus Christ

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

As an embedded systems engineer, I find VLSI shaders to be a fantastic technology.

Simultaneously, AI code overall is absolute fucking trash.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It looks like dog shit lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

I knew that nvidia will at some point make graphics fully ai generated, skipping the rendering.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

I want to see what this wold look like applied to a character editor but then I never want to see it again.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

How many R's in room since you've got a fancy nvidia card?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also, twenty feathers and twenty pounds of bricks both weigh twenty pounds.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I would try to interpolate your probably real question here, too. And I'm no AI. Unless I missed your point

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Someone posted yesterday with a question asked to AI.

What weighs more, 20 pounds of bricks or 20 feathers?

The useless chat bot will always answer with "they both weigh 20 pounds" because that's what the training data always says when asked about bricks and feathers.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I said. I expect it to interpolate silly questions to a sensible meaning. Of course it would sound like you wanna compare a comparable set of data. I would, as said, also assume you meant 20 pounds of both and just forgot to say that. Maybe adding "take this question literally" helps?

No fan of AI here, but hate where hate is due 😁

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They did ask it to consider and repeat the exact wording of the question, yes.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Hm, i just had to try myself with chatgpt, and:

so, as suspected, it just tries to ignore one's nonsensical questions unless asked to take it verbatim. This is actually not even dumb. If it had said "your question makes no sense", we would call it stupid to not see the obvious error in the question - as it's a run-of-the-mill-"riddle".

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

I'll have to find the post, but you did it in two steps, changed the units of mass, and object.

The post, which is extremely hard to find with the latest slop release from Nvidia, asked the chatbot to consider the exact wording, without babying it into the correct answer. All because the close variations of the phase "X pounds of bricks and X pounds of feathers weigh the exact same" have been used in various textbooks and such for at least the last hundred years or so.

That means that the chatbot has seen that exact combo of words, in roughly that order, quite a bit more than your use of "100 kilograms of rice". At least in English.

You can baby it through when the training data is sparse, but not when there are hundreds of uses of the same phrase over and over again in the training.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›