this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
85 points (96.7% liked)

Television

1769 readers
324 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Of course the internet and social media amplifies the critics. But I hate the idea of blaming a not so good series on the internet and the fans. Because the reverse could also happen. And it doesn't.

Maybe I'm not a fan because I only liked TNG, DS9, VOY and some of ENT, while not really liking much of the new Kurtzman universe/timeline. I skipped DIS as I don't think it's my thing. And I skipped PIC too. Still, I was convinced to try SNW on lemmy, and I liked much of it. Maybe as much as ENT. I also loved LD before it got cancelled. Even with all the usual toxicity of some fans, some positive comments and videos were able to sway me into trying them and liking them.

However, as much as I agree that some "fans" are toxic, other fans have made very detailed and logical videos about how this most recent series is bad as Star Trek. The ratio of bad reviews from pretty much all the spectrum of fans kind of confirms this, and I'm sick of seeing a lot of the past actors act like they know exactly what Star Trek is, should be, what fans should like, and if they don't like it, it's their fault and the internet's fault.

“It was literally the biggest Star Trek set ever,”

It's not because it's litterally the biggest set ever that it makes it good Star Trek. And it's not because he directed an episode that the writing will be better.

As we can see with the series Picard, and to an extent the movie Nemesis, sometimes actors are not exactly the best references for the canon of what they are acting. The dune buggy in Nemesis was Steward's idea. As is a big part of the concept behind the Picard series. And having actors like Kate Mulgrew and Robert Picardo defending this and even going against some fans like me, is hurtful too. Enough so that I'm willingly distancing myself from social media and stuff related to Star Trek now. It pains me to see them push something that has lost most of its soul and blame the fans.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It's not for me but neither was Discovery. That being said, there were folks that liked those shows and that's great. I don't have a problem with new Trek, SNW and Lower Decks are more my speed.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Trek is branching out. All the stuff from the 90s was episodic, fitting into the syndication template.

SNW and LD are a lot more like those 90s series, which is why I like them. It’s also the same reason I like The Orville.

Disco is a lot more like a Game of Thrones style series. There are some subplots but a lot of the show is focused on the big story.

Academy is a school drama. Not my bag but it’s definitely someone’s. But just like I’m not gonna shit on someone’s love of Buffy the Vampire Slayer - which isn’t for me for similar reasons - I’m not gonna shit on someone for liking Academy.

[–] PointyFluff@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 hours ago

Discovery and SFA are terrible soap-opera garbage. it's the type of writing some alfluenza orange-county high-schooler thinks is witty; it's what people who can't read consider "good".

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fandom is such a toxic concept nowadays.

Do I personally like the show? No. But it's not for me. I'm old. It's a new world with new demographics to cater to and new viewers to appeal to.

So it's perfectly okay that it's not for me. It's not as though my trek has vanished. It's still there whenever I want to watch it. My trek is literally everywhere. Pluto TV, Paramount Plus, or the crap-tonne of DVD's I've collected over the years.

Society has changed, writing styles have changed, audiences have changed. Get over it, people. How come people can't not watch something while shutting the fuck up about it? Why does your dislike of a property give you the right to make other people's lives miserable.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As social creatures, when humans form a community or identity their amygdala fires when that community or identity is threatened, exactly the same as when they’re given a physical threat.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like excuses to bully people. Just go find another show and let alone the people who want to enjoy it.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 61 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Self-proclaimed Star Trek fans gatekeeping the universe so hard that they hurt Jonathan Frakes makes me irrationally angry.

He's one of the few genuinely good ones. Don't be like that.

[–] lath@piefed.social 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They're not fans. It's just shameless, mindless profiteering using the "hate gets more clicks" dogma that the incompetent media outfits have adopted as a mainstream.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There are legitimate problems with the show, as there are with all new shows. But all the assholes complaining about “wokeness” drown it out.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I don't even like the show, but there are ways to be critical of someone's work without being so mean that you cause them to make a public statement about it.

90% of people on the internet don't even know what tact is anymore, and it definitely shows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

Yeah honestly fuck those people.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 25 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I think the problem is that the internet is more prevalent and mainstream than back then. Like newsgroups could be downright toxic, but the majority of fans didn't see them.

When I was watching TNG, it was either at my dads house watching it on television or discussing it with my friends in school.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I think the problem is that a lot of the current Trek shows are poorly written and waste good casts. Programmable matter? Dumb. “I swallowed my combadge”? Barf. A crying alien is the answer to why every starship in the universe suddenly explodes? Just awful.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 28 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

This. TNG would trigger conservatives if it were in today.

Remember when Ricker feel in love with the non-binary alien and they had a whole discussion about pronouns? It's been thirty years and these guys still aren't over shit like that.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean just the whole Curzon, Kor, and Jadzia scene. Actually all of DS9 would send them into a panic.

Heck, most people misinterpret Roddenberry's original intent, anyway. It always makes me laugh when people talk about Star Trek becoming woke.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 15 hours ago

Seriously. Star Trek is "woke" first and science fiction second. Gene wanted to make an integrated show, he didn't particularly care if it was science fiction or not.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

When fucking who???

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, the only reason there wasn't a concerted anti-woke campaign against Trek back then was the technology just didn't exist to enable people with minority opinions like that to easily find each other.

Still, they were there. I remember some BBS Trek guys being "that guy" at a few Trek conventions in the 90s, they were just usually solo or in tiny groups.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

And specifically fuck them for making so much noise about representation that actual criticism gets drowned out.

I’m worried that the creators will think anyone who doesn’t like the show has a worthless opinion and won’t learn and improve, and may even double down.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, us woke people should be demanding better woke representation in media, not this superficial bullshit in modern Trek.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PointyFluff@lemmy.ml -5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Starfleet Academy is a fucking insult to all star trek fans and anyone who might want to watch a show.
Under-age drinking?
Everyone's a moron?
Klingons are pansies?

Frakes is so completely out-of-touch and absolutely full of himself. Fucking rich entitled actors -- goddamn common clay.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Fuck off tankie.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

I liked the last episode more than any other in the season, despite it being maybe the least Star Trek one?

Previous one was ridiculous. Oh, these "kids" are traumatised by a bad experience? Let's fix that with theatre! All together, 'cause of course everyone can heal with the same "therapy".

I still hope this series can turn out to be good, after all TNG itself didn't start out great. But it seems they want to bash you over the head with emotions and ideas, rather than make you feel and develop them yourself.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

As someone who desperately wanted to go to Starfleet Academy most of his life: These are not the elite kids I thought would be in it.

“I swallowed my comm badge” is something a toddler would say, not a Starfleet Cadet.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Worth remembering that this is a Star Fleet rebuilding itself from the ashes, not the Star Fleet of old

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I get that, but if they’ve got cadets who swallow their comm badges they’re really scraping the bottom of the barrel

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Known many theater kids? It's pretty spot on actually. Entertainers in general usually use their gifts as escapism or as a safe emotional outlet.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

If only Starfleet Academy was a theater school

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 8 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I hadn’t even heard of this till now.

Is it better than Discovery?

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

With the exception of the Section 31 movie, everything they’ve made has been better than Discovery.

Academy is certainly different but I think it stands well on its own merits, including good character work, respectful use of existing canon, and a strong emotional core.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Even Picard S2? Did you just block that one out of your mind? I wouldn’t blame you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I watched a couple episodes and they took the parts I liked the least about Discovery and made a whole show about them.

I concluded it’s not really made for me so I’m rewatching Lower Decks

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

Can you please elaborate a bit more, because I really didn't like discovery and I don't want to be disappointed again.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It’s much more focused on the emotional development and relationships between the characters. Academy feels like a teen drama, which isn’t something I liked even when I was a teenager.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Thx. I get it. Not for me either.

But I'm not worried. For sure something gritty and political will be made at some point in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 5 points 15 hours ago

I’m going to give it a miss in that case, I’ve never enjoyed that sort of drama either.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 7 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Academy has the best elements of every single series to date.

It’s not perfect—nothing is—but it’s impressively good and enjoyable. Yes, there are some quieter or seemingly "boring" moments from time to time, but these are usually when you need to pay attention, as they pay off big time soon after.

That being said, —and this isn’t necessarily aimed towards you personally— if you’re the kind to snub an entire series barely 5 min into it after mindlessly watching while doomscrolling, then repeatedly trashing it online to justify your lack of interest, then, no, it will not satisfy you, just like nothing else will.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 14 hours ago

Academy has the best elements of every single series to date.

Objection. I've seen very little professional behavior from anyone except maybe the Doctor and the Commandant, and of course Admiral Uncle. Some leeway can be granted, given the setting, but it's something I very much miss from the TNG era.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›