808
submitted 7 months ago by yesman@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 269 points 7 months ago

My god. This deliciously tasty excerpt:

In various campaign biographies, a résumé and interviews, Mr. Santos said he graduated from Baruch College in New York City, where he was a volleyball star on a championship team. He boasted of working at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and amassing personal wealth. He claimed to be descended from Holocaust refugees; that his mother was in the World Trade Center during the Sept. 11 attacks; and that he lost four employees in the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando.

None of those claims were true.

[-] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 125 points 7 months ago

The real question is where tf were the journalists while Santos was running his campaign on these false claims?

Too busy playing horse race? Frantically trying to find something newsworthy about Hunter Biden's laptop? Credulously glorifying some billionaire's childish misconceptions?

Guess we'll never know.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, he's a representative for New York, in a district for ~~New York City itself.~~ Long Island and "technically" a tiny bit of NYC. (I have been informed that his district is mostly Long Island)

Let's break this down into two parts, okay?

  1. Local journalism is dead, dead, dead, dead dead. Especially in big places like New York City, where everyone assumes that the New York Times will be covering things. They didn't dig deep into Mayor Adams either, and that guy is under investigation now as well. They didn't question his former police credentials after decades of police misconduct. Beyond that the NYT is more of a national newspaper than an actual local paper. I'm sure there are plenty of small independent news sources in New York City, but I'm also sure they're mostly drowned out and ignored compared to how many people read something like the NYT.

  2. Corruption in New York City is literally, completely nothing new. Journalists have been failing to uncover unscrupulous activity for decades in this city. As I referenced mayor Adams above, this city filled with the rich, egotistical, and greedy, is a city built on the kind of lies George Santos peddles. How do I know? Because that city allowed Donald Trump to be a successful real estate developer using similar tactics. People have known he's corrupt since forever, but plenty of his corruption was just ignored until decades later. Same with Rudy Guiliani and so on.

Now I'm not saying we should just give up. Local journalism is important to fight for, and NYC being a corrupt hell-hole isn't a permanent foregone conclusion. However, my point is that NYT employs far fewer reporters than you think to cover an entire country, and the dearth of real local news sources all over the country is contributing to these kind of people succeeding, because the local press is dead in the water and can't afford to send someone researching local corruption.

Pay for your local news, is what I am saying, I guess, and things might marginally improve.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

I remember seeing articles about this stuff during his election. Republicans elected him anyway. That's where we are now

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 28 points 7 months ago

Why are you blaming journalists and not the GOP for not vetting their own fucking candidate.

[-] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 7 months ago

¿Porque no los dos?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 7 months ago

The North Shore Leader, a small paper on Long Island, broke the scandal before the November election. By the time other outlets picked it up, Santos had been elected. Grant Lally joined Geoff Bennett to discuss.

PBS News Hour - Small, local paper uncovered and reported George Santos scandal before November election, January 9, 2023

Local media does need support.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago

where tf were the journalists while Santos was running his campaign on these false claims?

There aren't enough journalists to go around. There are hundreds of congresspeople and there definitely aren't hundreds of journalists covering random unimportant congresspeople.

People have voted with their dollars, saying they don't care enough about vetting congresspeople before they're elected to actually pay the salaries of journalists to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

There's a reason why there are so many memes about this guy:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

Well, go big or go home. I’m sure he met Jesus Christ personally and he knows where Excalibur is hidden.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 122 points 7 months ago

Jesus, after all the shit that has been uncovered about this fucker, 114 voted "No" to throw him out?

Investigate those 114 motherfuckers.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's not rocket science. The only publicly said reason it's never happened before is they want to respect the decision of their constituents. Unofficially, nobody wanted to see themselves on that chopping block.

From a political scientist game theory point of view it's possible that a majority faction of party A throws a minority faction of Party A on the chopping block and Party B obliges them because they think they can pick up those voters.

So yeah, a lot of resistance to actually unseating someone. For good and bad reasons.

[-] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 100 points 7 months ago

I can't believe that they treated the first Congolese-American female PHD/Astronaut this way. Did she cure polio for nothing? You can't do enough for some people.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 40 points 7 months ago

I thought he stormed Delaware Beach at Normandy while solving P=NP.

[-] SauceBossSmokin@lemmy.world 55 points 7 months ago

Wow it finally happened. Now I wonder if they'll take away his Grammy, 2 Oscar's, MTV Movie Award, Nickelodeon Teen Choice Award, and induction into the Grand Ole Opry.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

Now convict him of his crimes so he doesn’t have any of the other perks of Congress.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago

Seven counts of Wire Fraud. He's donezo.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

According to factcheck.org

Members of Congress are eligible for a pension at age 62 if they have completed at least five years of service.

He didn't last a year...

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

You can't just kick a Galactic Emperor out of Congress, WTF?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

So there's finally a line: "you must be this shit to get fired". I expect a lot of people toeing up to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 29 points 7 months ago

We live in historic times. Sixth congressman ejected. First speaker voted out. I wonder what happened around all the other historic times?

[-] Raconteur_Rob@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

I wonder what happened around all the other historic times?

You could learn all about it at your local library!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

Which two Democrats voted against expulsion and which two voted Present?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

According to NYT, Robert Scott of VA and Nikema Williams of GA voted No.

Al Green of TX and Jonathan Jackson of IL votes Present

Sheila Jackson Lee (TX), AOC (NY) and Dean Phillips (MN) have no vote recorded

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/12/01/us/politics/santos-expulsion-vote.html

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And he went home and masturbated and the world went on like nothing happened.

Seriously wtf, is this the actual end?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago

Goodbye to Rep. Evil Pee Wee Herman. He was often hilarious, but he had to go. 

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You shouldn't sully Pee Wee Herman's good name with this man, lol.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

He needs jail time for his theft and fraud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

So just like any other government job, it was porn at work that does a person in.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Poor guy, he’s never going to have good work references.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

Or did they... apparently the NY Times source was a Mr. George Santos...

[-] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 16 points 7 months ago

You might remember him because he was the first Asian-American to join the Harlem Globetrotters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Paorzz@lemmy.zip 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The comment sections are killing me 😭

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
808 points (98.2% liked)

News

21678 readers
2958 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS