krashmo

Asked on CNN this morning whether Democrats were going to see to the unredacted files, Raskin said, “Absolutely.”

"We sent them a letter and so we’re demanding a right to do it. I hope the Department of Justice will keep its word and let us in there."

Holy shit guys, they sent a letter. We got em now.

I could not muster a weaker response if I tried.

It's a perfectly fair assumption given the fact that you're attempting to equate two numbers that are multiple orders of magnitude apart for ideological reasons.

What sort of action should the world take against governments that murder protesters?

I think it's self evident that 6 and 36,000 are not even close to the same number. Given the instance you are from I would like to ask a follow up question though. How do you feel about all the protesters killed by the Chinese and Russian governments? Do they matter as much as the Iranians or Americans killed by their respective governments?

Stop trying to avoid the lists. We should be trying to put so many names on these lists that they become equivalent to a census. Hiding doesn't work so stand up and fight in the light or accept that you'll die in the shadows.

If the US government killed 36,000 protesters I would probably want them to.

The point is that you don't casually go about your routine during a civil war

IIRC they moved Ross out of state. So yes, he's not in jail but he's not exactly lounging at home either.

I don't think IT guy, or at least the equivalent people in my life, would be supportive to the point that they would actively involve themselves in a shooting war in support of Trump, which is what this hypothetical scenario would turn into.

If there's one thing I've learned about conservatives it's that they will start to pay attention once something impacts them personally. They are fine with the lies when it's about some abstract person some other place but when it involves someone they know or happens in their town they will change their tune quickly. Of course not all of them but enough to matter. These kinds of people prioritize familiarity and perceived stability over just about anything else. As long as things are stable enough that they can maintain most of their routines they won't think too deeply about anything. This kind of event, and the ensuing chaos, would force them to take a deeper look at things in a way that they're currently too comfortable to be forced to confront.

Even if the guillotine took out every billionaire tonight the next lot would pop up and and carry on the same evil work unless we fix the system.

I agree, at least in part, but I still think that would be a great place to start. Rich psychopaths never stop fighting for power and money. The people have to do the same and not be lulled into a false sense of security, thinking that the work is finished. The wolves may be ever at the door but if you hang the last ones pelt on the lintel the next will think twice about entering.

“Fast-forward 1,000 years, the Earth will be geoengineered,” he said. “The entire climate will be regulated like a modern house—no question.” The climate may get screwed up in new ways as scientists attempt to turn the planet’s temperature dial down. But “if it survives, humanity is simply going to do this.”

That's a neat idea but at the rate we're moving we're going to kill ourselves off well before we figure out how to do anything approaching geoengineering effectively.

You are being lazy. If "I have to learn how to do this" is too high of a bar to clear for you then maybe you're just not supposed to do that thing. Setting up a self hosted environment is pointless if you don't know at the least the basics about how it works. It will break sooner or later and if you just typed whatever random characters your computer told you then you'll never be able to fix it. You won't even be able to describe to ChatGPT what the problem is.

AI is making learning harder, not easier. It's flooding the internet with bullshit and you're acting like that's a good thing. When you're learning something new you need to know that your teacher knows what they're doing. An AI summary might be pulled from a network engineers blog or it might be the sanitized ramblings of a schizophrenic pedophile who tries to host CSM on his smart toaster. As a beginner, you can't tell the difference, especially when an AI rewrites the crazy and presents it in an authoritative manner.

Yes, learning new things can be hard but the internet is already the shortcut. Quit trying to outsource even more of it.

"I think AI is bad but other people who say so are weird"

mmk