krashmo

I didn't do anything different in my response to you than you did to me but OK

I don't disagree with anything you said, except your classification of those actions as rational. I think framing the world and responding to it the way you described is completely irrational.

That last sentence could be true, but if the US can't keep national cohesion together the EU probably can't either. One of our big problems is cultural diversity providing avenues for division to take root. The US is infinitely more homogeneous than the EU. I don't think Europeans are prepared to act like a unified society outside of a few common interests. I still think they should try, but I also think that means something vastly different to citizens in the different nations of the EU.

Rich people don't give poor people stuff, even if it means they get more stuff too. They aren't rational actors. They have what should be already, and will one day be, classified as a mental illness.

I found myself in Italy
They said we could have condoms free
All partnered up by two or three Everyone partook with glee
But now none are left for me

So hearken friends
My luck portends
This story ends
For me unfortunately

I skied directly into a tree
Then rolled the dice in the dormitory
It now burns badly when I pee
I hope my mom is proud of me
I only brought home an STD

Along those lines, there's no technical reason we need representative governments anymore either. The reason representation was necessary was because it was clearly impractical for multiple reasons for all citizens to travel to the same place, debate the merits of proposed legislation, and vote on implementation. The internet solves those problems. The system hasn't changed because we're coasting on institutional momentum.

Now, that is not to say that I trust any current government to implement such a system in a fair and impartial manner. However, all the technology needed to do so has existed for a long time now. The only things stopping us are entrenched power structures and a lack of imagination.

I'm a man and I'm not laughing.

You don't have to say it, I was already leaving.

There are people here and other places on the internet who can make a difference in enterprise contracts as well. I am part of an AI pilot program to roll out ChatGPT at my company right now. You can be sure that I am actively pointing out that, among other things, OpenAI is being sued by several entities for stealing data when their primary promise to us is "we won't use your data". That feedback matters and some of us learn about that stuff from places like this.

I know, the article says specifically "sampled his DNA". That is not biometrics unless this author has no idea what those words mean.

I understand the context but I like to imagine Bondi thought she was looking at that lady's internet search history and not her search of the Epstein files. It's funny to picture Bondi sitting there waiting for her to say something about pedophiles so she could respond "oh yeah, if you're so concerned about pedophiles why were you Googling this:"

Then reading the first item in that list which seems to say

"New Brazilian just arrived. Sexy and cute. 13 yo"

I can't say that's surprising but I have only heard of smart TVs having been confirmed to do that

Sampled his DNA? WTF is that for? Nobody has a DNA lock on their phone.