this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
250 points (97.0% liked)

Today I Learned

28530 readers
1152 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 2 points 5 hours ago

Is having a cat associated with a higher risk?

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I expect the causality goes both ways, for example maybe you wouldn't consider having a dog because your stressful job takes up too much of your time, or you don't have the money to pay for dog food and vet bills, or you live in a tiny apartment in the city and it would be cruel to keep a dog there, or you don't have the time or energy to take a dog on walks, or you just don't like going on walks or you're afraid to go outside, or you can't cope with raising a dog because of some health issue, or you have terminal cancer. In which case it's the dog-incompatible situation that's the issue rather than lack of dog.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

People are unlikely to get a dog if they expect to die soon, or are generally unhealthy and unable to walk it which is also more likely if you are going to die within 10 years.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 20 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Does this dog buff stack? If I get 5 dogs, wil? I have a ~100 % immunity for the next ten years? Is there a cooldown? /j

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

5x 24 = 120. You're not just immortal for the next 10 years, you have 1 in 5 chance to revive the death as well.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Behold I am the great immortal and moderately effective necromancer. Fear the power of dogs!

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Does the size of dog affect the buff? The average dog gives 24%, but does a 200lbs mastiff give more than a 4lbs chihuahua? Less?

[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

As always, a good study ends with: 'Further study is needed on this subject.'

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think it would, but the chance of breaking a limb tripping over a dog does increase!

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

It decreases with a larger dog....

[–] tover153@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

My doctor was very glad when I adopted a new dog after mine had died 18 months before. I have a good doctor.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 12 hours ago

Waking up early and going on walks is good for your health

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 83 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

There was a study a while back that associated grip strength with one’s grip on sanity, and many people confused the cause. If someone has something to do, they’ll have stronger hands. If they have a healthy diet that supports their physique, they’ll have stronger hands. If they lack a debilitating injury or disability, they’ll have stronger hands. If they have ambient time to devote to exercise, they’ll have stronger hands.

Unequivocally do I love my dog, but I try to avoid conflating associated privileges with results.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Just riffing off the headline here, but owning a dog is directly associated with engaging in the act of walking a dog, and walking is pretty well established to be good for overall health. There's no reason to assume there isn't causation when there very well could be

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

There genuinely might be something to it, but this strikes me as another “wine is healthy, ignore the healthcare and self care culture behind the European curtain” type situation. Until something more concrete comes out, I’m just gonna pet my pal for fun and stress relief and monke brain grooming instinct alleviation.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 26 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Soft hands typed that post.

I’ve already made arrangements with the local kill shelter to give me fifty dogs that were scheduled for execution. This weekend I’m going to the city to visit hospice facilities, to save some lives, two at a time.

[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

To hold that many leashes you need quite a lot of grip strength

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Since I've just read the headline and they are always the peak of the important information I was just going to get myself 100 dogs making myself 240% less likely to die making me immortal for 10 years.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

240%? Please take note who is responsible for the zombie uprising this year.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 49 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

People who drink wine live longer.

It's not the wine that's extending people's lives, it's the healthcare and lower stress from having enough money to afford wine.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm guessing wine-drinking countries also have good diets. Seeing as it's mostly around the Mediterranean and thereabouts. E.g. people of Caucasus are traditionally known for longevity while being pretty hardcore drinkers of wine and other stuff during celebrations, but they also have kingly cuisines and live in resort climates.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)
  1. walking dogs is good exercise.

  2. dogs are excellent security and help reduce certain anxieties.

  3. walking an invisible, imaginary dog probably has the same health benefits as a real dog for most people.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yesterday I learned about #3. It's called "hobby dogging".

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

For more information, search for this with safe search off and add "UK"

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's really hard to pick up the invisible imaginary poop though.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I find it pretty easy. I never see any lying around that I've missed.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I bet ghosts hate you though.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Plus walking a dog in your neighborhood probably results in increased social interaction and less isolation, probably a plus for long-term health too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

People likely to die in 10 years probably don't often choose to adopt dogs.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 4 points 13 hours ago

I'm not so confident. My grandma got a dog to fill the hole in her life left by my grandpa's death. Nine years later I inherited a dog. (TBH, she was already on the deep slide into dementia when Grandpa died and losing her partner of 5 decades didn't help.)

What I'm saying is old folks sometimes do things we wouldn't expect.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 40 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

I bet it’s a mix of walking more and them making you happier.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Some people also just hold on to life until their dog dies of old age.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 37 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I bet is all the assassins the dog repeal everyday without the owner knowing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, as the other comment says, these are almost always correlations, not causations. Poor people are almost certainly less likely to own a dog. I'm sure the exercise helps, but I'd bet on it not being the largest factor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

My cats would like a word.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

More rent payments? Hard pass.

load more comments
view more: next ›