This is documented in the manual. Here is the solution. Can you please write a clearer entry, so the next person understands better, as you did not understand how I wrote it.
People are lazy. Make them do the work by asking and they will learn to do less work by checking the manual and not asking you.
That assumes absolute good and bad. Good can also have a relative meaning, when used for comparison.
Maxine oeake is always great but almost everyone in this series is good. Well worth a look.
You could say the same about some kleptocratic states too. Without the maintenance nor the reliability. It's about integrity and accountability whether it's state owned or government owned. The difference is motives for individuals involved. Capitalism values the profit motive. Public private partnerships value how it looks to voters, who are generally worse off as they pay more for what would be more efficient under government control. Having two competing is probably an attempt to get the best of both worlds.
From what I've seen, research and habits wisez those that grew up in the depression tended to be thrifty for life, always planning meals and avoiding waste. It was a hard habit to break after being hungry I'm sure. I haven't seen anything about their political leaning. I think community and helping people rated highly in values. Both sides of American politics would claim that as their values.
That's why people traditionally moved right as they aged. However, millennials are bucking the trend is the point.
It is also posited that as you age, you're more likely to have family and think about their immediate needs rather than society at large.
However, it can be just greed. The problem for conservatives is that they have tipped the balance so much that the divide is much greater and inequality greater, so they need to convince people to vote against their interests. The bottom 90% are far better off under more social measures.
Are millennials also the first generation to have lower standards of living than their parents? I think housing costs is the biggest part of that.
When he realised the feature exposed them, he pulled it.
That was my first thought, but hearing her statements, I think she's out. If she was pivoting to something else, I think she would have announced that instead.
They won't find someone so earnest. So, they might have less success. The sycophant won't be as high profile and therefornpesa powerful.
There is a third option. Trump is a fool with a brain of mush and Mamdani was just personable and vaguely flattering while sticking to his agenda. Trump believes whomever speaks to him.
Because they did it on every other item they sell with a screen and internet connection.
It's nitnjustbthatbthey show ads, it's that they track you and show you ads based on that data.