hitmyspot

Funny that at one point, people would have assumed Putin could be lying and he's make Trump look foolish. Now people knew he was lying and that trump was a fool, so neither has had reputational damage. Sad funny, but still.

You can set a pin as an alternative. Pin would be easier to brute force but no different to a password when forcefully unlocked by coersion.

They could, but they won't until standards and/or consumer sentiment require them to.

Here an entire bloc of customers is saying we don't want antibiotic and chlorine chicken. Instead of meeting demand, by upgrading standards, they are looking to have standards reduced.

The future of protein production, evidenced by the rise of vegetarianism and veganism, as well as the environmental risk, is improved animal welfare and reduced environmental impact.

Solarfoods protein is not chicken and would be unaffected by this trade deal.

Just fine TikTok. EU wide. If it costs them more than it makes, they stop.

The point is that both are worse and it makes no sense for either the eu or the UK to reduce their standards for worse food and woree animal standards.

Only trace amounts, within safety limits. However, less is better and there is no benefit for animals or people for the UK or eu to lower their standards to allow diseased animals back I to the food production cycle.

Only if your phone is locked to your carrier. On which case, you were already bound to them and their policies.

I have esims from an international provider when I travel. My phone is unlocked.

This is chicken, not tap water. Both remnants of chlorine and the salts will remain. It gets rinsed but not fully eliminated.

It is low risk, but it is still a risk. One that the eu and Britain don't want, while they also have concerns about animal welfare.

Most but not all.is.converted to salts . that's the point. It's safer than disease, but there are methods of production that can just as effectively eliminate disease without chlorine. With oxidizing agents, there are "safe" levels, but even trace amounts increase risk.

This is without the animal.welfate concerns.

Says something when even rich people are better off elsewhere.

Nothing is 'perfectly safe'. It's about risk reduction not elimination. Chlorine is an oxidizing agent which increases cancer risk. Less is better.

No, chlorine is an oxidizing agent. Small amounts increase cancer risk.

Water is essential for humans. excess water is a risk. Normal quantities are fine and desirable. Any amount of chlorine is a risk. that's the difference. It's not desirable in any amount.

We can tolerate small amounts of chlorine and we put it in drinking water to make the water safe. The same thing is happening with the chicken, but better conditions for chickens and slaughter, like in the uk or eu would mean the chlorine is not required, which is better for people's health.