hitmyspot

What do you mean by attack? Hair pulling, exploring with fingers etc is all normal. Generally, a negative outcome lets her know she’s not allowed to do something. It can take time.

I agree with the other poster. Meltdowns should not be given into. I also wouldn’t describe them as going mental. Remember, the words you use are now being soaked in.

Time out I appropriate, but keep the, short and try a time in type, where you sit with her somewhere quiet without distraction. We use a naughty step still for older kids. The naughty step is not for naughty kids, but to discuss naughty actions, or red choices.

Using spanking or physical discipline is never warranted, so it’s worrying that it’s your first instinct for discipline. I think youll need to look at how else you can discipline. Kids crave uniformity and boundaries. Set them and keep them.

Combined with grandma, depending on age, having paper like skin.

This is 2 years old.

The analogy takes one sentence to explain. Your explanation took 5 paragraphs.

That is the point of an analogy. To make it "analagous" to something familiar, so as to avoid explanation.

You keep on asking someone to refute your facts. They are not in dispute. What's in dispute is whether the analogy works. It does as it represents the fact that the ai does not understand it's output. The analogy does not reference the search nor the human that is doing the reading.

The point is that the AI LLM does not understand what it is outputting, in the same way that a person does not need to understand a Wikipedia page to read it.

Rather than a Wikipedia page, perhaps you'd get the analogy better if they said reading a page from an advanced physics textbook. The point is that the information being presented accurately does not infer understanding in the case of AI. That was represented perfectly fine in the analogy, which was it's purpose.

They simplified it, and also used hyperbole. That's not the same as motte and bailey.

You're being too literal, while still being imprecise. It's likely why you're struggling with what the analogy is for.

Is universal healthcare why hiv is spreading rampantly and the life expectancy is at the bottom half of the world, one of the lowest for a developed country?

There is universal healthcare and a working social sytem in theory, not in practice. That doesn't even account for the loss of life from the way where over a million are, avoidable, dead. They aren't values, they just churn them like meat to grind.

People are seeking to flee Russia, not move there.

Or of Hamas attacks Israel, then Israel ahsnjistbartack d Israel. Obviously, this doesn't apply to any countries that recognise the state or Palestine. Israel does not.

Stop hitting yourself meme here.

Are they raking in cash or promises of cash from companies with no income stream?

Unless maybe you're not from the area of the world.

There is a fee for crypto transaction processing. The fee is the same irrespective of dollar value, so for small transactions, like buying a game, it is more than a cc middleman fee.

Eventually, I think k this is where crypto can work. Something like the digital euro where the transactions are processed by a trusted entity, the European central bank, rather than your local bank through the visa or MasterCard system. If those fees can be low or eliminated, visa and MasterCard are dead.

No, the analogy is about not understanding but regurgitating data. It's more complex than that but the gist is that they don't understand or have knowledge of the data being presented.

They are statistical models for what is desirable output. They don't understand what they give as an answer. That is why they halluncinate information that sounds plausible and confident.

We're not refuting your point about how the technology works, but rather that the person you replied to provided a poor analogy. They didn't. It served the purpose it was designed to do. If you don't understand that, that's on you, not them. Maybe ask an ai to explain. ;)

Ana analogy does not need to be precise. It expresses a comparison for easier understanding. It is not what LLMs do. However what you've expressed is simplified also. So by your standard, it is not useful for the discussion.

So maybe get your head out of your ass and try to understand what people are trying to express instead of correcting them when they are not incorrect.

If precision was of that much importance to you, you would have a different opinion of LLMs.