this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
169 points (97.7% liked)

News

36142 readers
4024 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Washington Post reported that activists are working with the White House on an executive order to declare a “national emergency” over America’s elections and pave the way for a power grab.

“Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting,” reported the Post‘s Isaac Arnsdorf. “President Donald Trump has repeatedly previewed a plan to mandate voter ID and ban mail ballots in November’s midterm elections, and the activists expect their draft will figure into Trump’s promised executive order on the issue.”

Peter Ticktin, a MAGA activist in favor of the executive order, told the Post that “we have a situation where the president is aware that there are foreign interests that are interfering in our election processes,” and that “the president has to be able to deal with it,” including by banning mail-in ballots and certain voting machines.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 22 points 1 hour ago

And none of that actually gives him any power to do anything like that.

He is not the States.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Even if it were true that China stole the election, how is "something happened 6 years ago" an emergency? He won in 2024, so it can't be that effective anymore.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

It hurt hurt his feelings bigly. And if anyone, anywhere has ever hurt Donny's feelings then it is a national emergency.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 minutes ago

It's an emergency because if he leaves it alone Republicans are going to tank hard in the midterms which will mean he loses power and might even be held accountable for his crimes.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

He will just never get over the fact that he lost in 2020. And he's willing to make all of America suffer for his butthurt.

Probably should've done it before shit talking the supreme court. I have little faith in them to act in a timely manner, but who knows?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago
[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 35 minutes ago

Oh I'm shocked, shocked i tell you.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 27 minutes ago

He'll probably be dead by the mid terms, as "healthy" as he currently is. Why even bother?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 85 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

He's already declared like 30 emergencies.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Because "emergencies" are the Wild cards given to the Executive Branch by Congress and SCOTUS. There's no clear definition and no boundaries until he's challenged in court or Congress overrules him.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 hours ago

Those are just called sharts.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 17 points 3 hours ago

He's the boy who cried wolf of presidents.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 51 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Man he's really got this civil war speedrun record locked in.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 37 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Speed run it all the way to the guillotines plz

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

No clipping and straight to the end, please.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The French didn't exactly speed run it themselves.

I'm currently listening to old episodes of the Revolutions podcast, and am midway through the French and it bares no resemblance to what's going on now. Which, when it gets to the reign of terror, might be a good thing... But that's the one part of it that I could see happening again.

A lot of the terror was fueled by a murderous little shit with a bootleg newspaper. There's a reason why lible and slander laws are so powerful in that part of Europe.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Without the war, and the civility.

Without the war

says you

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Night of the long knives in 3...2..

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This would be where they burn down the ~~Reichstag~~ congress.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Can we please just skip to the part where he eats a bullet in a bunker?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

That only happened when it was clear to him that he wasn't going to win.

I sort of wonder if Trump has that foresight.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

It could be argued that even Hitler lacked the foresight until that last hour when it was discovered his armies were not coming to his rescue.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Someone please lock Dem leadership in a closet somewhere so people who care can deal with this.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 32 minutes ago

Both sides are the same so we should just not vote and let Trump win.

-Leftists

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Where are these people who can deal with it?

Please, show some evidence that they actually exist. I don't need names and addresses, thats just opening them up as targets.

Do they exist? Because all I've seen is a lot of bitching and whining and declaring that no-one is good enough to do that.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 27 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Another article acting like the executive has any power over elections. They portray this as a warning, but all they're doing is normalizing the idea.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 hours ago

This is absolutely the most important thing to keep in mind here.

Remember, this is a memo being circulated by Trump supporters. It's actual legal basis likely sits somewhere around "political fan-fiction."

The same thing happened in 2020. Trump supporters invented completely nonsensical legal justifications for how Trump could sieze power. None of them held water.

Can Trump just ignore the law and declare shit anyway? Sure. Self-coup is always an option in any democracy. But he is deeply unpopular; I don't really see that working out for him, although the process of it not working out certainly might be a very violent one.

Trump tried to self-coup in 2020, and the result absolutely fizzled. It was violent, and messy, and innocent people died, but in the grand scheme of attempted insurrections it was pretty fucking pathetic. He's got a cult of personality, but he's never actually done the work to build the kind of organized support he'd need for something like that.

I'm never going to tell Americans that the danger is over and everything is fine. There has probably never been a more dangerous time for American democracy. But don't mistake that danger for inevitability. While Trump is carving a path of destruction through your government, norms and institutions, he's also bleeding power every single day. You can win this.

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The billionaire owned media is normalizing this on purpose.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 7 points 2 hours ago

Well yes. That’s the idea. They’re special and deserve more than one vote. Democracy is foul, to them. One vote per person undermines what they believe regarding themselves.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

This is exactly the Project 2025 playbook. Doing things by the law takes time. In that time, they do as they please.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

That's a good point; think of all the other things they're normalizing this way as well.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 13 points 3 hours ago

Are we in the greatest American period ever, as claimed during his long-ass speech to the union, or are we in a national emergency? It can't be both.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn't there actually have to be a "National Emergency" before he can just "declare" one? I seem to remember the South Korean president tried something similar there. Wouldn't it be great if the consequences were the same?

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

For there to be consequences we would have to have a legislature not working for billionaires.

All of this comes down to billionaires buying their way out of having just one vote.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago

Doesn't there actually have to be a "National Emergency" before he can just "declare" one?

Yes, but here's the problem. Both the courts and Congress in their truly finite and limited wisdom have decided that only the president can determine what is an emergency.

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 19 points 3 hours ago

The US regime has already committed so many serious crimes by now that I would be surprised if it did not try to establish a dictatorship. If it did not do so, all members of the government would risk prosecution as soon as they were voted out of office, even in a legal system as corrupt as that of the US.

[–] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As an outsider I can only hope that

a) Trump would never do something that benefits others

and

b) That Trump is that unpopular, that he would lose a third term

and

c) Americans become a more french when being unhappy with the ruling party

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Never underestimate the DNCs ability to run a candidate that the moderates couldn't even hold their nose to vote.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I've always preferred "Never underestimate the DNC's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Ironically, if he is successful, it would be a national emergency.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Trump is so old. He looks like he's going to die any day now. And MAGA doesn't worship his administration team. Only him.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 9 points 2 hours ago

The idea that this ends with Trumps death is no different than leaning on the hope that someone else who isn’t you is going to stop any of this.

Yes, he looks terrible. Yes, it’s entirely possible we wake up tomorrow to news that he died in bed.

But consider what happens next. Peter Theil assumes the presidency through Vance. And Theil hates democracy.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 4 points 2 hours ago

And MAGA doesn’t worship his administration team. Only him.

Yup. MAGA doesn't have something similar to North Korea's Juche to save them because all Trump thinks about is himself.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 hours ago

Sorry everybody. I sneezed and it caused a national emergency to be declared.

[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 hours ago

When he steals our democracy and outlaws all other political parties...I bet Schumer, Jeffries, Collins, and the useless lot will all be seriously concerned.

They're probably all sitting cross legged getting their strongly worded letter constructed.

... Is it too late to become Canadian?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago

Kill him now!