We need to give the Aperger's type of autistic people the power to rule.
Maybe as some kind of council, because you can still end up with an Elon if you're not careful.
We need to give the Aperger's type of autistic people the power to rule.
Maybe as some kind of council, because you can still end up with an Elon if you're not careful.
Demented PEDOPHILE Psychopath
"TSSSSSSSS. GOD, YOU'RE HOT. YOU KNOW THAT?"
🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮
Who supports him?
Who supports them?
I think the application of pressure goes where its possible to apply it, instead of where it isn't.
Thanks. I use loops too :)
I think people need to figure out the warning shot. Like you have to find an assertive non-hostile way to tell someone to stop their behaviour. If they continue to do it, then the "it's not bullying" card becomes pretty flimsy.
Sucks to be awesome, i guess.
I could not imagine what it would be like to feel so threatened as to be filled with such a hateful sentiment. I should really say it sucks to be whoever that kind of person is.
Deep down, billionaires are good people. #OceanGate
Yeah Reddit is a giant pile of dogshit. Good riddance.
I have to ask, did your friend get told to kill themselves because of being a gay autistic furry or was it for something else?
I think you're probably implying that is it, but I've been told on reddit to kill myself for all kinds of things that are less interesting than that.
I do not like the term AuDHD.
I don't mind if that's how you want to refer to yourself or anything, but I think it adds noise when you try to socialize the concepts of autism or ADHD to the layperson.
It's an example where we've oversubscribed to labelling, to have a category for both when the word 'both' will do just as well. And you could say that it's just because of the high comorbidity of the conditions and, for sure, that's what it is.. but regular folks still trying to adjust their idea of autism a bit to just include Asperger's and having a hard time figuring that out.
And so I think it undermines efforts to advance cultural acceptance.
I mean it wasn't meant seriously, but I can understand why you might take it that way.
I'll digress from the post a bit here... I can appreciate what you're saying, but this is a wild distortion of what occurred to reclassify Asperger's Syndrome as ASDL1. This is not what happened or why it was done, and there is no credible evidence that Hans Asperger himself was a Nazi or that he tortured anyone.
Again, I appreciate where you are coming from. This story, although many people believe it, is not at all correct. But yes, his work to understand and determine the nuances of autism was used by Nazis to determine who would be killed and who wouldn't. He did cooperate with them, but whether he doomed a group of people or saved another one in that situation is a matter of perspective.
And I personally don't think we should change the names of the things that might be rooted in darker history, regardless of the actual events, well-understood or not. Not simply for the sake of it (again, that's not why it was done in this case). That begs us to forget things that need to not be forgotten. Maybe part of why we find ourselvse repeationg our mistakes as humans.
Speaking, of course, as an autistic person myself.