this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
339 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28520 readers
2109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Conservative ideology is inherently fascist. You cannot separate them.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

There is a range of ways to run an economy and a society which can all work reasonably well. Conservative doesn’t have to be fascist. Its more that Republicans purged the non-fascist conservatives from any position of power

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

America First - White supremacy garbage slogan adopted by the KKK back in 1920.

America is for Americans - Identical Nazi slogan "Germany is for Germans"

One homeland, one people, one heritage - A variation of a Nazi slogan "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer" which is listed as a central Nazi phrase at the Holocaust Museum.

We will have our home again - ICE recruitment effort. Used by far right ethno-nationalist Völkisch movement.

Numerous speeches referring to vermin, poisoning blood of our country, etc which are all Nazi/White nationalist dog whistles.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Many Nazi ideas are a direct port of racist ideology from the USA. It's pretty easy to argue the Nazis picked it up from us. The Republican party is a haven for Nazis, not because Nazism is a new phenomenon in the USA, but because it's made in the USA.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

No, WE have a Republican and Nazi problem and they're the same problem.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 86 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Holy shit, the Atlantic are finally acknowledging there's a problem, rather than just sanity-washing fascists and claiming that nazis have no traction.

It became a problem partially because of the media being controlled by fascists. The atlantic is one of the worst.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

"how did the gop become this" they're barely admitting shit, it's always been.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Holy shit, the Atlantic are finally acknowledging there’s a problem

The Atlantic only sees a problem when a guy they don't like is in charge. Their editorial staff will forget all about the GOP's Nazi Problem the minute Jeb Bush is running the RNC again.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Hot take: it's always been a problem, but people had enough fear of social reprisal to keep that stuff to themselves.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The media was a huge part of it, especially the Atlantic. They went off my list pretty early on for headlines and stories that covered for this administration. One article doesn't absolve them, they're POS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure the problem is that they don't have a problem with Nazis.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Republicans were not always Nazis. The article tries to look at how the change happened

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 32 points 1 day ago (7 children)

They kinda always have been. Did everyone just forget about the Ku Klux Klan? What about the 1920s Eugenics movement? Operation Paperclip? First NATO Secretary was an ex-Nazi.

Western society is fucking teeming with fascists and nazis pretending to be polite waiting for their chance. Leftists have been talking about this for decades and just got told "not everyone you disagree with is a fascist"...

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 16 points 1 day ago

The motherfucking business plot. A literal fascist plot to overthrow FDR. Implicating the Bush family. It's been 100 years of creeping Republican fascism at least.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

During the KKK era, the Democrats were the ones in favor of hate, while the Republicans were not. The parties radically flipped after the passage of the Civil Rights act as a direct result of Nixon making a decision to support the hate to win elections, though the full flip took decades to play out. We're hitting the end of that now.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This, but also it was more complicated as well: There were conservative and liberal contingencies in both parties, but after the big flip, conservatives went with or stay with Republicans, and progressives gravitated towards Democrats.

I'm 50, and I grew up after the flip, so it's weird to think about how it must have been before. I think that's the only reason things worked out as well as they did after WWII. Somehow we managed to push back against the racists and make some progress (Civil Rights Act, etc.) and even kinda pushed them into the racism closet for a while there. But boy howdy they exploded back out when the Tea Party took off and Obama was elected. But by that point, the Republians had already been working on attacking our democracy for a couple of decades.

The Southern Strategy was one big waterfall moment; another was when the Republicans partnered with evangelicals. I think the first big moment when partisanship really started to show its ugly head was the attack on Clinton and the attempt to impeach. Not that he didn't abuse his office for blowjobs, but that really was not impeachable - and they didn't get him for that, they got him on what was really a technicality. But after that, it feels like the gloves came off and partisanship was the primary tool of the Republicans.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Not that he didn't abuse his office for blowjobs

This makes it sound like he was getting blow jobs from political favors.

He had an affair with one intern.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

The point of the phrasing is not "this is a fair description of what was happening" but more "even if it was as bad as this, it's still bullshit". So you're right, but that's why I phrased it that way.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republicans were not always Nazis

They kinda always have been. Did everyone just forget about the Ku Klux Klan? What about the 1920s Eugenics movement?

Before the Southern Strategy(c.1960s), klansmen, etc… were more likely to be Democrats than Republicans.

The people have always existed (by various names). I think this is more an inspection of the party itself’s shift

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt they're referring to the party affiliation, and instead to the ideology of the voters and politicians.

The orgs/brands/teams they've historically supported are irrelevant when their current support is dependent on present and future fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

How? Initially because it was expedient and then later because it became a central pillar of the platform. In the 70s and early 80s they adopted the southern strategy and dog whistles to flip over all the Jim Crow southern democrats who were fuming at LBJ and the democrats for going along with the civil rights movement.

Like, they’d lost the debate about “the new deal” in the 40s and 50s and “the great society” in the 60s, and knew that actually repealing such things would be electorally unpopular, but they still wanted to get rid of them and all the taxes on the rich that funded them. So, gotta find some wedge big enough to convince some people to look past losing such popular programs, they went with “racisms”.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The racist shit started earlier. Daughters of the Confederate and so on. Nixon was a racist shit and a republican who was pivotal in the war against drugs. He also was recorded saying the war on drugs was to get black people. He disproportionately sent blacks and poor people to war.

https://eji.org/news/nixon-war-on-drugs-designed-to-criminalize-black-people/

Then there's Reagan. https://www.npr.org/2019/07/31/747041525/historian-discusses-recording-of-reagans-racists-comments-made-to-nixon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wow Atlantic.....really hot take. Did you finally realize what we all knew years ago?

[–] mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah this is a reheated take that should have been posted in 2015.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And nearly a decade late even then.

Anyone who didn't see this with the rise of the "tea party" just wasn't paying attention or was ignorant. Maybe not about us heading toward fascism (especially so quickly), but there was an increase in nazi bullshit even then - but with the rise of the sheer public racism that RUSHED out of the closet... we knew we were fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL, "how"? "[B]ecome"?

Has The Atlantic met the Republican Party?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The author of the piece is a former Republican. They actually flipped sides on the hate thing a few decades ago, but it took a while to get to the point where open Nazism instead of dog whistling was ok

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 23 hours ago

But that's the core of the republican party. It's always been for hateful bigots

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

How?

That's like asking how Trump got in the Epstein files over a million times. It was a coordinated effort by both of them, that lead to a long and comfortable relationship with the slimmest margins of plausible deniability.

I'm still waiting to see if the Nazis jail and execute the Republicans eventually, or if it will be the other way round.

No. They HAD a nazi problem when they decided to let in the first nazi.

Now they are a nazi party.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump proved that the "moderate" right would tolerate the inclusion of actual Nazis, white supremacists, and other fringe right-wing groups (along with previously unaffiliated weird counter-culture groups like antivaxxers, conspiracy theorists, flat earthers, etc) as long as meant they won elections and got their supreme court picks.

The "moderate" objection to extremists was always nothing more than a fear that it would cost them elections, it was never really an ideological or moral position.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because fascism is the far right and all fascism acts the same. It isn't difficult.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically they always had a Nazi problem they are just enjoying the fruits of their labor at the moment.

I can't imagine American Nazis were voting for the Dems.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The GOP doesn't have a Nazi problem, it's what they've always been. It isn't a problem for them, it's the ideal. It's everyone else who has a GOP problem.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Well, the Nazis borrowed a lot of slogans and ideas from the KKK, who was folded into the GOP during their southern strategy push to grab up the racist/religious vote.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

🔫🧑‍🚀”always has been”

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They also have a pedophile problem, too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BaroqueBobby@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It’s the racism, and naked desire for power, stupid

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It became more overt due to the die off of all those from WWII that punched nazis.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

A bunch of those who punched Nazis were kinda sort of rooting for those same Nazis before the US entered the war, some of them very high up in the pre, and post-war government. And those same people kind of sort of stole a lot of Nazis and brought them back home.

load more comments (1 replies)

living and growing up for twenty five years of living in the rural midwest, I could have easily told you how this happened and how radio and cable news spread this problem.

[–] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

The call is coming from inside the house.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Always have been, just not as out in the open as now

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Republican party has been embracing the death cult vibe long before Trump. It's the natural location for Nazis to coalesce.

You don't cater to evangelical zionists without the death cult ingredient. In many ways the US portion of this goes back to Jerry Falwell and the UK portion goes back even further.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Any discussion of the open acceptance of Nazis into the GOP that doesn't mention gamergate is, at best, incomplete.

The fact that a central part of was some guy making up stories about his ex cheating on him is fucking wild.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›