silence7

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

A judge dropped charges against the immigrant and another man after the top federal prosecutor in Minnesota said new evidence was not consistent with the agents’ testimony.

It looks like higher-ups are starting to realize that Republicans won't hold power forever

 

A judge dropped charges against the immigrant and another man after the top federal prosecutor in Minnesota said new evidence was not consistent with the agents’ testimony.

It looks like higher-ups are starting to realize that Republicans won't hold power forever

 

Archived copies of the article

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 hours ago

No. They're just building concentration camps.

 

Archived copies of the article

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
 

Documents released Thursday offer the most complete picture to date of the Trump administration’s controversial and costly plan to overhaul immigrant detention using industrial buildings.

Access options:

 

Documents released Thursday offer the most complete picture to date of the Trump administration’s controversial and costly plan to overhaul immigrant detention using industrial buildings.

Access options:

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

In California, any new tax like this has to go to the voters. I suspect that it has been poll-tested.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In much of the US, living together and presenting yourself as married over a period of years means you're actually married.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not usually a participant in them. Feel free to do so yourself if you are.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The big group this impacts is married women — in particular it has a name-matching requirement which will block a large fraction of married women from voting. They're doing this because women have consistently been more likely to vote for Democrats than men:

This makes it very much worthwhile for Americans to ask their Senators to block this legislation by any means necessary.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The goal here is to keep women from voting: the SAVE act very specifically requires that you

  • Prove citizenship
  • That you prove that the name on your citizenship document (eg: birth certificate) match your current name

Because women often change name when they get married, they'll have a mismatch, and need to spend time and money to be able to vote. If the legislation passes, it will block about 20 million Americans from voting. Because of gender disparities in voting, Republicans see this as to their advantage.

Give your Senators a call at 202-224-3121 and ask them to block this change.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

This is the United States, so they're imposing a requirement that somebody not just have a state-issued photo ID, but have a birth certificate or passport which matches their current name. It's very common for women to change their name when they get married, so the net effect if this passes is to prevent tens of millions of married women from voting.

Republicans want that because women are more likely to vote for Democrats than men.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The key requirement in it requires you to have ID with the same name as proof of citizenship. Because women frequently change their name when they get married, it means that they won't have matching documents, and won't be able to vote.

Call your Senators at 202-224-3121 and tell them to vote against it.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Gift link so that you don't need to depend entirely upon archive sites.

The underlying analysis that the article is about is here

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

He still seems to have enough support among white evangelicals to prevent that. Probably an embarassingly low double-digit result.

view more: next ›