Climate

8487 readers
277 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
2
 
 

move expected to threaten Rice’s whale and other species with extinction.

Access options:

3
 
 

The U.S. doesn’t have enough bio-based diesel to meet the administration’s new mandate, so blenders will have to import yet more foreign crop-based oils.

Biofuels generally have this problem when you try to scale them up; they only end up being sustainable and carbon-neutral at fairly limited scale.

4
5
6
7
 
 

The panel voted to override Endangered Species Act restrictions on oil and gas activities in the Gulf of Mexico, home to critically endangered whales and other imperiled wildlife.

This will have essentially no impact on fuel prices; those are set on global markets, and the US has been a net oil exporter since the early Biden administration.

8
 
 

Critics say president is locking into 20th century energy systems even as his ‘bet’ on oil and gas ‘isn’t going so well’

9
3
Climate risk explained (www.theclimatebrink.com)
submitted 9 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
10
11
12
13
14
15
 
 

This news article is about a preprint, which means that the study wasn't peer-reviewed. It has a number of serious problems

16
 
 

The law would make fuel companies help pay for damages caused by climate change. The administration argues it’s unconstitutional.

17
 
 

A report estimated the cost to stop using oil and natural gas for the USA in 2019 to be $4.5 Trillion and that this is similar to what we USA paid for the "War on Terror".

The 2003 Iraq War cost 1.4 Trillion directly and maybe 2.4 Trillion in finance charges.

Note: I am not saying these wars were necessarily due to oil, but they may have gone differently.

I wonder how much USA oil wars have cost compared to moving to solar, wind, and battery?

18
19
20
21
 
 

Gift links to Financial Times articles like this one often have a view count limit. If it has run out, you can check archive.today for a copy or use the app version of the site. Be aware that archive.today sometimes modifies archived pages

22
23
24
 
 

The sweeping new law enshrines farmers' use of gas-powered equipment and weakens protections for conservation lands, locking the state's climate-battered ag sector into fossil fuel dependence.

I'll note that the typical municipal restriction on gas-powered gardening equipment (leaf blowers, weed whackers, mowers) is because those devices tend to use gas engines which don't have any of the pollution or sound controls that cars have, so they create a huge amount of noise, and lots of particulates which kill people.

25
view more: next ›