this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6949 readers
504 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Access options:

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago

I like my evap cooler quite a bit, but I do have a normal AC unit as well. I use the cooler for about half the year. The other half it's either too cold or too humid to use. I'll switch to the AC when it's too humid.

Another benefit of evap coolers is that you can run it without water, so if you wish the temperature outside was the temperature inside your house, you can have the cooler blow in uncooled air.

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Growing up in the desert, swamp coolers can only do so much and only if the air is dry. When it hits 128 in the summer, the 20 degree drop isn’t refreshing. If the humidity is high, it can’t do squat.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 hours ago

You should probably move out of death valley.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Lived in AZ. Fuck swamp coolers.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca -1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Heat pumps are a much more energy efficient alternative.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Heat pumps used for cooling aren't any more efficient than an air conditioner, as they are exactly the same technology. The only difference between an air conditioner and a heat pump, is that the heat pump has a valve that lets it work in either direction (to heat or cool), while an air conditioner lacks that valve, and thus only ever cools on one side, and heats on the other.

A window air conditioner turned around so that the exhaust is facing inside the room acts as a heat pump.

While air conditioners/heat pumps are efficient, they still use a lot of electricity. A heat pump is usually considered efficient in comparison to a resistive heater, which is 100% efficient compared to a heat pump's 300%.

[–] flyingSock@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

In general ac units are heatpumps. Efficency gains would be had from building insulation.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago

Are they more efficient than an evap cooler?