this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
160 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14341 readers
488 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
160
Okay (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by miz@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
 

source: Bellablackbrabbit on rednote

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pastaguini@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Someone posted this on Reddit and one of the comments was something like “love seeing the celebration of two resistance badasses in this image: this kid and Barack Obama

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's not fair, Obama resisted financial regulation after the economy crashed and he took office

[–] miz@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you got me so bad. I had to read this three times

[–] Juice@midwest.social 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Responding to hexbears by agreeing with them in the style of a moderate liberal disagreeing with them has unintentionally become one of my posting habits

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

he also resisted occupy wallstreet

[–] facow@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

Barack "Resistance Badass" Hussein Obama

[–] prole@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

I keep telling libs about Obama trying to increase the ICE budget so much that even Congress was like "whoa buddy, calm down"

Idk if they don't believe me or just don't care or what, but bro was definitely part of the problem even domestically and I'm old enough to remember it clearly. Even libs were hating on Obama while he was president, especially the second term.

[–] context@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

bloomer this really fills me with hope for the future

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kid in a school was walking around shouting "I support ICE" and filming it. Kid in the picture walked up told him he was gonna deck him, guy said he'll get in trouble for it so the kid said "okay" and decked him.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Just saw the video, that's amazing

[–] context@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I never saw this version. It's surprising to me that Occupy Wallstreet failed.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It failed because it lacked a vanguard. It was ideologically incoherent and had everyone from frustrated radlibs to weird libertarians and some of the loosely organized left. It could not have succeeded because there was no cohesive ideology holding the movement together. It was an infarction point of the working class and they had no framework to succeed. Our job is to make sure that the next time it happens we can guide that energy and concentrate it into a revolutionary mass.

[–] alyqz@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It also scared the Epstein class and they brought out the counter terrorism units. I've started wondering if this scared them into astroturfing the alt right.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

Tea party were the ur chuds who went insane seeing a dark skinned man in the white house

[–] Juice@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It was very individualistic. Its also incredible to me that it took 5 years to mount a vaguely recognizable movement to take action after the economy crashed and the bankers got huge bonuses for crashing it. That's one of the signs that we are further along as a movement, although we def have a long way to go.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

Chalk another one up for the Marxist-Leninists being right. I still remain an anarchist at heart but I take very seriously the "by any means necessary" part in my pfp

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Were you there when they presented that poster to Obama? That's the 1905 battleship moment.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

Like physically? No lol. I just remember when it first appeared. I just assumed it was something from his campaign team. Also what is this about 1905? What does the Potemkin have to do with this lol?

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

falling for this shit was so cringe even in 08

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I mean I was skeptical of course but I did vote for him because at least at the time he was promising to shut down guantanmo which was only a few years old at that point. He also promised to prosecute Bush for war crimes. Of course we all knew both of those were long shots but his campaign was more revolutionary than even Bernie in 2016.

The best thing about '08 was a lot of us learned a hard lesson. Electoralism is a dead end and political power grows from the barrel of a gun.

This is a message to all of you on either side of the Mamdani thing too. It does not fucking matter, he might do some good for NY he might not. None of that matters in the big picture and getting so wrapped up in electoralism makes me want to kind-vladimir-ilyich

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want to do everything in my power to eliminate the Republicans. That group is responsible for so much pain in my life. They are a cancer on our society and they're never going to be on our side.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree but I felt that way 10 years ago and the next decade taught me that to Democratic Party are Nazis too. At this point I recognize that both are irredeemably evil, but I hate the Democratic Party with more vitriol than I hate the Republican Party.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hate the Dems too. I just want to see the Republicans die off. Let the Dems become the conservative party that we crush with a revolutionary party.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

Inshallah, comrade. Inshallah

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

The problem I have with this right now is there are some truly repugnant people running for office. Like people that are doing awful things to our trans friends. I'm not saying that Democrats are even good on this issue, but it feels like a betrayal to not participate in trying to get rid of these bigots.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's something fundamentally incoherent in pretending electoralism is a dead end while armed revolt is on the table for the American left, that couldn't be further from the truth, there is no extant American Workers Party to organize armed workers and the US military body is still cohesive and massive

Armed revolt is a viable tool for the Third World, not the Western left. The American masses are electoralist in political mode and outlook which means the left must be there to contest that ground; otherwise they'll fall for fascism

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

There's something fundamentally incoherent in pretending electoralism is a dead end while armed revolt is on the table for the American left

I don't believe either of these things are true tbh. There is certainly usefulness in electoralism on a case by case basis but not as any revolutionary strategy. I think at best we can mitigate harm by building parallel power as the empire declines and cannibalizes itself.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

I know that lol, I'm old

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is rednote the same as XiaoHongShu?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

yeah it's the English name of the company that they chose. literal translation is "Little Red Book" but that is too heavily connoted for a western audience

[–] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think I know a single person who isn't a real leftist who would know the significance of that phrase.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

i know a nato anarchist who thinks they named it after that but is too ignorant to realize the chinese name of mao's little red book is something else so that doesn't make sense as a name for what was intended as a domestic service.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

it's programmed into the boomers but they really dialed back the "Chicom" scare stuff in the mid-to-late 70s. let's just say America's gerontocracy would not like it