this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
79 points (97.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37887 readers
1335 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As I'm sure you've already memorized the community rules as if it was your moms birthday, I probably need not post it, but here is rule 6 anyway:

  1. No US Politics.

Please don’t post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online

I am writing this post in an effort to gather feedback on how the community feels about this rule. In short, keep it as it is, or revise it.

It is my personal belief that the main purpose it serves is to avoid the community from mainly revolving around whatever daft thing the orange lardsack last said or did. And while it serves that purpose well, I think it also inhibits some potentially interesting discussions.

For example, one possible revision could be to allow for questions regarding US politics, but with a requirement that the topic has to be regarding issues 25 years ago (that may or may not be relevant today).

Alternatively, would it be useful/entertaining to occasionally have a "Contemporary US politics question megathread" as a contained outlet?

Please let me hear your thunks. This post will stay stickied for "a while".

UPDATE: There seems to be overwhelming majority in keeping r6 as is, at minimum. Thank you for your input, and stay classy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

100% keen on keeping it. Expanding it to keep all political discussions out would be nice but I know that won't happen.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Expanding it to keep all political discussions out would be nice

Not even possible. Every post would devolve into a discussion of what's political.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The rule is currently US politics, where I would like to expand it to other countries because /r/Europe turns into US politics because "it effects Europe"

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

It seems that the rule seems to work well enough here as is. In addition to the rule, how you enforce it is equally (if not more) important too.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Just narrow the definition of politics to party politics plus named subjects.

[–] remon@ani.social 43 points 2 days ago

For the love of god, keep it as it is!

[–] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a US citizen, keep the rule. As laid out in the text of the rule, there are already communities where questions of that nature can be asked.

Agreed here. People should wonder what normal life like can be in the USA than our politics. Not saying it's great, but I think it gives better insight than who people voted for.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Keep the rule as is. US politics already gets brought up enough already.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

!AskUSA@discuss.online exists so I say this rule should stay. I feel bad enough about the deluge of US news our non-yank co users deal with as it is.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but that also doesn't exactly like "overt politics"... whatever that means

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Ah yeah my mistake. Whatever politics comms they link to in the sidebar is what I meant. I want to say askpolitics? Yup.

!askpolitics@lemmy.world

[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’d like to add this:

If you are a chronic political poster, please think of yourself as someone who crates ads. We currently live in a world where ad creators think they have a god given right to shove ads into every square inch of our existence. And naturally, this is universally hated and people go to great lengths to block as many ads as they can because the ad makers won’t stop and think they have to do this.

That’s you. You’re the ad maker. And that’s how you’re perceived.

I know where I stand politically. I’ve known my entire adult life and I won’t be changing. I also know where to go to update myself on what’s going on politically, both locally and globally. I like having the option of going to it voluntarily and not having it imposed on me involuntarily. I like having the option of turning it off when I want/need to. I have never in my entire existence had a positive or productive or enlightening political discussion with anyone on the internet, ever. I just end up wrestling pigs and I’d rather channel my energy elsewhere. I’d imagine a lot of people agree with that sentiment.

That all being said, keep the rule. There are people who will still post political shit here because they can’t help themselves, regardless of what gets said in this thread.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

it make sense on a niche community, but an ask anything community it will just devolve into politics eventually anyways.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Where do you draw the line between world news and politics? I mean the president launching airstrikes on Iran for Israel's forever war, is that politics? The US annexing Greenland? The US bullying the EU into letting tech run roughshod over their users?

What about the EU imposing age checks and chatcontrol as a trojan horse to get inside liberal democracy to id every account and every ip and connect it to id cards and likeness, and run everything a person does or says through AI threat detection, run by Palantir type organizations, to make secret social scores to be used in secret in myriad ways against people in ways they can never know and not challenge? Is that politics?

It's impossible to extract world news from politics completely is it not? I personally have been ignoring whatever dumbass shit the president has been saying, and political news myself, just trying to follow events, but you can't separate them completely.

[–] Tywele@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago

Please keep it and I would even say to enforce it more strictly because I see so many question that I would categorize as US politics that are still allowed.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago

It's possible to imagine people having good questions about US politics, e.g. something like "I'm considering running for this public office in this state, what do I need to know about x?" but good luck crafting a rule that allows that and not the worthless noise.

[–] MuttMutt@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I'll put it this way. I would prefer zero politics. If you allow them I'm gone.

People who want to talk politics can easily create their own place to do so and nothing is preventing them from joining other places that are political discussion havens.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

There are other communities to discuss politics, usa or any country. I say keep politics out.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah keep it. The pedo dictatorship can be discuss in other communities.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Fuck America, that's my take.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Keep.

Political questions are almost always either bait or pure laziness

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

Keep it. There's more than enough places to discuss politics.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

I really like how this rule turned out on UK subreddits like r/casualUK. It makes for a much more relaxing community.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago

I think it’s a great rule!

To me, the links to alternate communities are essential. They allow you to set restrictions while still maintaining a helpful atmosphere. Sometimes, people have legitimate, good-faith questions, and don’t know where to ask them. Those links help demonstrate a real concern for the users. Well done!

[–] Sephtis@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it should be expanded into a rule of no politics in general. While the us politcs have the most effect(are most know worldwide) EU poltics and so on should also not be discussed here imo

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see a problem with a bunch of European-specific questions being asked, so I question the need for an expanded rule.

If you broaden the rule, you run at risk of banning or discouraging desirable questions. Stuff about economics or lifestyle. Those are "political" too, after all.

[–] Sephtis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean yo run the risk of banning some stuff regardless of if you only ban us politcs or eu politcs. What would be a reason why questions about european politcs would be any different than us politcs. best would be to just ban polutics in general, while keeping lifestyle/economical stuff etc, this would however require some nuance

Edit: to specify i don't mean to ban European specific questions, just eu-poltics.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair, but nuanced rules are difficult to enforce, and somewhat open to interpretation. This leads to people trying to skirt the rules and also good faith posts which break the rules which leads to conflict also.

I think it's better to keep things as simple as possible, as long as the rule is good enough.

[–] Sephtis@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Totally agree. But let's for example say someone asks a question about something related to economics. I think it would be unfair if Europeans could answer a lot of stuff about politics, while Americans are pretty limited.

Imo It already requires nuance at the moment, the only thing that would change is that all users would be treated the same

[–] SomeDudeFromSpace@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Please please pleeeease keep it.

Edit: If possible, disallow politics in general.

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

It already gets political ?s even though it's not supposed to. Taking out the rule just encourages even MORE of them.

[–] bibbasa@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

eyyyyy, shameless self-promo, but i made a community a couple days ago called !politicaloptimism@piefed.social

i'm a little nervous about bringing this up since i'm the one of the only people active there right now, but we have a "Seeking Optimism" flair for people who are concerned about things and want assurance for the most sensational narratives over what's happening.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

Well, I just subbed! I think it’ll be good for my mental health.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Big time keep as is

As long as "no ethics" doesn't become a new rule, I'm okay with this.

[–] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Keep the rule and LOL @ "orange lardsack"

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

PieFed has already implemented a feature which allows mods to move posts from one community to another. Lemmy and NodeBB are also working on this feature.

Ideally we choose a community where these posts are moved to, that way any great discussions aren't lost and they can carry on in the proper community.

https://piefed.social/comment/9641830

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

25 years is pretty extreme, it's not like we need to wait decades for whole fields of research to occur before we have our own opinions--we're not academics with a responsibility to not spout random bullshit. Being randos on the internet, spouting bullshit is actually one of our primary activities.

4 years is probably sufficient to keep the volume reasonably balanced.

I'd say 8 would be better, just because they can have a second term. Usually those are consecutive, but still

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uKale@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Keep the rule as it is, and take those kinds of discussions in communities meant for political discussion. There's already enough of US politics everywhere else.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

I had an issue where the politics community did not allow discussion posts and ask lemmy did not allow politics and it was like. what the heck can I discuss this. that being said I would prefer for politics communities to allow for discussion posts than politics in general ask lemmy.

load more comments
view more: next ›