this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
124 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14341 readers
781 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Big@hexbear.net 53 points 2 months ago

It's almost as if rhetoric, debates, exposures, truth-telling and media consumption are just empty liberal rituals that can only serve to soothe oneself, and has absolutely no impact on real material life.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 41 points 2 months ago (2 children)

the secret third set of rules that even the worst people alive can't avoid playing by, is the fact that they're made of meat

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only vegan meat! Keep that in mind!

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

But they can consent to being eaten, which makes it the most ethical form of meat.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Epstein knew this all too well…

Uh, search the files for the keyword “jerky”

[–] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm embarrassed that I looked into this previously. It's almost offensive to the actual victims that people are trying to make this a thing. If there's one thing to take away from the files that we have, it's that these people are not good at hiding their crimes, they're just good at getting away with them. We don't need to invent atrocities.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

If your go-to jerky guy is someone who works at a place called “cannibal and cooks” I’m going to raise an eyebrow.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 36 points 2 months ago

These same people: "why would you change the political and economic system? It's the best we have tho"

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

For some people, this could be what Paulo Freire called a "limit situation" where people notice the structural limits of their freedom and the contradictions. Could lead to a transformation in consciousness, if it's not just passively accepted and offers opportunities for educators.

[–] Lemmyglad@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

'People who think they're free in this world just haven't come to the end of their leash yet.'

Michael Parenti

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

“Russia has spooky oligarchs unlike our entrepreneurial billionaire business leaders. Also since you like that K-pop stuff please never look up the word ‘Chaebol’” porky-point

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Quick! Someone think of a burger analogy! We might actually steer them away from fascism this time!

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

Imagine you make a hamburger, season the meat, toast the bread, cut the tomato, and then your boss comes in, eats half of the burger, and then molests untold amounts of children.

[–] larrikin99@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is written like AI...

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It sucks that every time I see an em dash now I'm like hmmmm

[–] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago

That em dash in particular isn't the chatgpt style. But when someone relies heavily on lists of three, that's a red flag for me.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Because it is AI. It's everywhere now. I've even got replies on hexbear and lemmygrad written by AI. Outsourcing thinking to the machine is the future I guess...

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 2 months ago

Everyone was told that they sucked at communicating and that we need to add a computer between the people to better translate as if the computer is somehow perfect at it.

Just yet another pointless middleman

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] piccolo@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not the person you responded to but when you read enough LLM output certain things just start to smell funny. It's hard to put my finger on it exactly but I am 100% convinced it is at least partially written by AI. The "No X. No Y. No Z." part jumps out at me, as does the "pretend exposure equals injustice" line, and the not-quite-sensical comparison to a spreadsheet, and the em dash at the end, and the structure of the last sentence...

I think learning to recognize AI output today is very similar to this comic: https://xkcd.com/1015/

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are right, it's not quite sensical, that entire sentence or two around the spreadsheet part especially, and just the choices of words, it's like talking to a scammer on email that speaks english well, but not perfect, and not as a first language, the way they use words you can tell it's not someone from the area.

"dumping files, parading names, laying out rape and pedophilia like it's a damn spreadsheet... then...no arrest, no perp walks...

It is off, no one would use those phrases in that manner, I can't believe I didn't spot it at first read, I have to learn to look for it, and suspect everything. now.

[–] piccolo@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it's super uncanny because it looks real at first glance, and then you read it again and again and more things are just a little bit off about it, but it's seemingly so close to something a real person could write.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Biddles@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Even the computers are angry!

[–] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is one thing to recognize the system is problematic. It is another to want to meaningfully change it.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Very true, but one is a prerequisite for the other.