this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
514 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27463 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a heated interview with CNN‘s Dana Bash on Sunday, Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino said his agents were the real “victims” in the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis protestor.

Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old Veterans Affairs nurse, was killed by Border Patrol agents on Saturday. In videos of the deadly altercation between Pretti and several agents, he can be seen placing himself between an agent and several women that he was shoving. Pretti is sprayed with a chemical irritant and then wrestled to the ground, where one agent repeatedly hit him in the head with the irritant’s metal canister. Pretti, who was legally carrying a firearm, was fatally shot by agents while on the ground.

DHS immediately painted Pretti as a threat, saying that officers feared for their lives because Pretti was legally carrying a firearm. Multiple videos of the shooting contradicted the official line that Pretti was threatening agents. On Sunday, Bash pressed Bovino for evidence “that he was intending to massacre law enforcement.”

When Bash repeatedly asserted Pretti’s right to carry his firearm, Bovino made the bold claim that Pretti forfeited his Second Amendment rights via his actions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBunGod@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 26 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

At this point I think it's pretty safe to conclude that when the right-wing 2A guys argue that 2A is inviolable/shall not be infringed, they mean it only in the context of service to right-wing politics, not that it's a right that applies to anyone else. In other words, they support the notion of privilege, not rights.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I was actually surprised to see a lot of comments on r/conservative talking about how the stuff the feds are saying about the second amendment is wrong and unconstitutional, and a good number saying that the killing wasn't necessary, they'll ultimately support Trump and ICE over any kind of progressive though but it was interesting. Even the NRA posted about how Pretti was a legal gun owner and there should be an investigation before people jump to conclusions.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago

This. Don't fall into the team based bullshit, this level of jackbootery should piss off everyone. If not for the red/blue bullshit I am sure that the vast majority of americans would rally together to counter the government overreach but instead everyone is doing the Two Minutes Hate.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My dad has always said it'd be the Republicans who would take guns.

They're working for it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

California's gun-control culture started with a 1967 law (Mulford Act) designed to outlaw carrying loaded guns. It was specifically written to keep the Black Panthers from patroling their neighborhoods with loaded firearms.

It was signed into law by Ronald Reagan.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When the order to seize the guns comes, it will come from the right, and not the left. Those with money can have guns, those without, can't, no matter what party they belong to.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Never gonna happen in the USA.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If MAGA takes permanent power, you can kiss your legal guns goodbye.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

No such thing as permanent power.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

Said the republic right before Caesar

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Historically speaking or in your personal experience in the US?

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Of course they support the notion of privilege. They are all about privilege and anti-egalitarianism.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

Never seen a bovine more ripe for the meat packing plant. Not that I'd let any dog i care about touch the filth that comes from his carcass in particular.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The NRA and right wing gun culture has convinced a generation that the 2A is about your right to own a gun.

The 2A is explicitly about your right to organize members of your community in order to defend your community, the fact that you need weapons for that means that you must also have the right to own weapons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone else not give a flying fuck what traitors say?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

There's my peoples. Fuck these nazis.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't realize constitutionally-enshrined rights were something a single appointed official could wave away simply by saying they "don't count."

And even if the victim had broken a law (say, if he didn't have a permit (which he did)), then the legal recourse isn't a summary execution. He was disarmed, he was no longer a threat, and even if he had been carrying illegally (which he wasn't), the law says that he be arrested and granted due process in a court of law.

These federal agents violated due process and the rule of law, and the victim didn't even break any laws.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t realize constitutionally-enshrined rights were something a single appointed official could wave away simply by saying they “don’t count.”

IOKIYAR.

This Pretti guy didn't seem like he was sufficiently identifying as a Republican...rights only belong to conservative Republicans.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Mind explaining the acronym? Too many permutations for me to try to think it through...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Oh!

IOKIYAR -> It's OKay If You're A Republican

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

Oh! I see. In-groups and out-groups. Protecting and binding. Got it!

Thanks

Americans, show them your second amendment counts already

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I am a lifelong supporter of the 2nd Amendment, but not a single issue voter. So no one can really place me politically.

What bothers me most is fellow gun enthusiasts (cough republican gun nuts)... always say its a "God given right".....

these events are going to be a brain melting contraction to their beliefs that the GOP supports them and that the 2A is immutable.

The GOP did a great job of convincing the feeble minded that they are their supporters and guns are their greatest political topic to rally behind... Now trump is having a come to jesus moment for the party, as his DHS, FBI, and others in his administration are saying they will kill you if you have guns around them

[–] TheBunGod@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The idea of "god given rights" has never been true. Humans have always had to fight for every right they have ever had, and it takes away power from those rights to insinuate they were given to us by some magic sky man.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (7 children)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

That is the rhetoric the regressives have used incessantly to defend their rights to firearms. Now that the KKK and proud bois have been given guns and federal authority suddenly those rules don't apply anymore.

Who couldn't have seen this coming other than most of us. The people I work with are 90% non white. They don't think this will apply to them. They don't like me talking about it. They think they can just keep their head down and someone else will take care of it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Rights are never forfeited, they are violated.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 19 hours ago

In that case, nazi fucks also have no rights.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“When Fascism came into power, most people were unprepared, both theoretically and practically. They were unable to believe that man could exhibit such propensities for evil, such lust for power, such disregard for the rights of the weak, or such yearning for submission. Only a few had been aware of the rumbling of the volcano preceding the outbreak.”

– Erich Fromm, Escape from Freedom

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

We STILL haven't even seen the worst of it. People consistently lacked the willingness to recognize that it could happen here, even when the threat was imminent. They don't want to think unhappy thoughts, don't want to think their world is crumbling, don't want to acknowledge that things will never go back to how they were. It's incredibly frustrating how much people delude themselves so they don't need to stare into the void.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

There were people in 2024 saying that the shit happening at this very moment would never happen under Trump 2.0.

These abhorrent acts have been so normalized over the last year that the unthinkable has become blase.

I shudder to think of where we are going to be in another year.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The Right is coming for your guns.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Well and isn't that just what they accused the left (and the center) of doing? Full disclosure, I am a gun owning slightly left of center.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Yes. But the left never wanted your guns. Just sensible laws. The right will now have to take your guns because they don’t want anyone forming a militia.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 17 hours ago

It's always been projection with those fucks.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Boy needs a couple strong rights, a few lefts, and finishing uppercut to his idiotic head

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Man, I wonder if the second amendment set is finally realizing the right has always wanted your guns more than the left.

Or did we forget "take the guns first"?

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 207 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Weird thing is this is the “government takeover” the 2nd amendment nuts have been screaming about for generations. Not at all surprised that they’re mostly silent now. Also not at all surprised it their own political party who’s doing this.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›