“plants dont feel pain”.
you can't prove that.
“plants dont feel pain”.
you can't prove that.
this is a straw man. perhaps you could try dealing with the facts and what I said.
surely you can see that there are going to need be more evidence. some kind of communication prior to the fact is probably going to need to be established.
significantly fewer plants are harvested if you switch to a fully vegan diet.
that has never happened.
If you’re eating meat, then you’re contributing to the death of all of those plants that had to feed the animals you’re eating
impossible. an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past.
I can only think of one that does: utilitarianism. it's frought with epistemic problems not to mention it can be summed up "the ends justify the means" which most people think is itself unethical.
what do you mean by "alive", and why should that matter?
you should still act to minimize suffering as much as possible.
under what ethical system?
if you grant plants sentience, veganism is still the more ethical option.
... for ethical systems in which sentience is a consideration.
Materialism really does lend itself to anti-intellectuals who think they’re so smart, doesn’t it?
this just ad hominem. it doesn't change the truth of what i've said at all.
your link implies that male calves all become veal, but the vast majority of male calves are brought to full weight before slaughter.