this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
90 points (98.9% liked)

Slop.

819 readers
642 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

amerikkka amerikkka amerikkka

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 55 points 1 month ago

Even RIGHT NOW, Democrats are voting FOR these things to happen. People these smug fucks VOTED for.

[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (4 children)

glasses-on We got Trump because of leftist purity politics

glasses-off We got Trump because of decades of liberals catering to fascists

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Beautifully stated.

Democrats would have needed to deliver on anything and I mean fucking anything popular to get 56% and keep it forever. It's controlled opposition. They're not trying to win. They're not ideologically aligned with anything besides being the same machine that ratchets the atrocities and dampens popular movements.

You have had this grievance about not liking Hilary Clinton in 2016 FOR A DECADE NOW! Where has it gotten you? A narrow margin after a Trump election (having to ult to keep Bernie out btw)? You had your chance to inspire anyone to see your POV but the PARLIAMENTARIAN got in the way? It was as nakedly ridiculous as any of Trump's antics. That's why there's no change to healthcare, affordability for housing+kids, imperial war, public transport, genocide, FUCKING ANYTHING WE DON'T AGREE ON ANYTHING. AN ESTABLISHMENT DEMOCRAT AGREES WITH TRUMP MORE THAN THEY AGREE WITH ME. SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY STOPPING?! FROM MY POV ITS NOT EVEN STOPPING TRUMP ITS KEEPING THE SEAT WARM FOR THE NEXT ONE BUT THE NEXT ONE HAPPENED IMMEDIATELY AFTER AND IT WAS TRUMP AGAIN. DONT WORRY M'LORD I RATCHETED IT JUST LIKE YOU ASKED

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

God, I really can't understand how these guys can directly say "being anti-genocide is a woke-left litmus test" and then argue that they and their fellow liberals are not fascists, rather than just being the Strasserite ("left" as a relative term compared to the Hitlerite wing) Nazis.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

These are probably watchers of lib journalists and commentators who implicitly supported the genocide when they said "Our way of life is better"; the slaughter of the global South isn't a crime to them, it's just a little embarrassment.

[–] filipinokilla@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

even from their perspective, the senate and congress WAS filled with democrats in 2021 and they blew it anyway.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First time I ever voted the Dems got a supermajority, possibly the best thing they could get via voting, and proceeded to checks notes pass Romneycare and drop bombs on weddings.

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, but a Dem had to go to the hospital, and the Democrats are the only party that has no means of enforcing party discipline. That is why liberals having a majority in all three branches of government can't produce any results. If only we had 70 senators, so that finally the 60 real and good democrats can out-vote all the 10 Manchins and Libermans, then we can finally do real progressive reforms and reign in the War On Terror.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

70 senators? where are you going to find 11 Manchins?!

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant once the Democrats get 93 seats in the Senate. Then there will finally be 60 real Democrats to outvote the 33 Manchins.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

but the part i don't understand is, how 93 seats can fit all 34 manchins plus the 60 votes to overcome them all?

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

There you loony lefties go again making the perfect the enemy of the good. We need to band together to pass the funding increase for the Manchinite death squads and THEN we will worry about reigning in the mandatory organ harvesting laws NEXT ELECTION when we win the 94 seats we need to really change things.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

No no you're not getting it, we're going to get one Republican to vote for it, by offering an extensive series of preemptive concessions in the legislation!

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

Oh, sorry, that is right. The Democrats would need all 100 seats, so that there will be 60 real democrats to outvote the 40 Manchins. Also, we would need the Parlimentarian, and the Puerto Rican, and the DC non-voting representatives, so that the three of them could scold the 41st Manchin into voting with the Democrats.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Trump using his military on American citizens

So not only was it OK on people of other countries, but also on """illegals"""? how-compelling barbara-pit

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but also on """illegals"""?

These are the same people praising Biden for being polite with his deportations, so yes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Kamala Harris believed supporting Israel was more important than defeating Donald Trump

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A fantastic point; why isn't Kamala taking this election seriously and trying to win?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago

Shortly after my conversation with Kagame, I ran into an American military-intelligence officer, who was having a supper of Jack Daniel’s and Coca-Cola at a Kigali bar. “I hear you’re interested in genocide,” he said. “Do you know what genocide is?”

I asked him to tell me.

“A cheese sandwich,” he said. “Write it down. Genocide is a cheese sandwich.”

I asked him how he figured that.

“What does anyone care about a year-old cheese sandwich?” he said. “Genocide, genocide, genocide. Cheese sandwich, cheese sandwich, cheese sandwich. Who gives a shit? Crimes against humanity—where’s humanity? Who’s humanity? You? Me? Did you see a crime committed against you? Hey, just a million Rwandans. Did you ever hear about the Genocide Convention?”

I said I had. It was passed by the United Nations in 1948, in the days after Nuremberg; it has been ratified by scores of countries; and it says that they will all undertake to prevent and punish genocide if it should ever happen again. “That convention,” the American at the bar said, “makes a nice wrapping for a cheese sandwich.”

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1995/12/18/after-the-genocide

[–] DogThatWentGorp@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My only response to this in the wild will only ever be "You're right. I ruined it. And I'll do it again if you don't do what I want."

The American liberal fundamentally has no understanding of how power or negotiation works.

[–] Poophammer@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ill let burn this place into the ground if they dont do what I want lol, its going to happen anyway if we dont bite the bullet now. The fascist arent going away

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know it's extremely beside the point, but isn't it amazing how the blame is always solely on the left? Like, it takes two sides for there to be a disagreement, but the zionists sticking to their guns (literally) doesn't seem to register as being a choice, only the anti-zionists doing so. idk dude, maybe you're just a zionist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't normally hark on spelling errors, but the fact that they can't (or won't)spell Palestine correctly is giving me some bad juju

[–] miz@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the regular spelling is filtered on every western platform now

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

Ah

That's fucked

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My first thought is that they did it to avoid automod or something.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

Gotta love all this freeze-peach

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

They told us both sides were the same while we warned them about [list of things generally supported by democrats] and they ignored us.

Ok bro if you say so just get in the pit barbara-pit

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey I just thought of a new litmus test called “the shit you support abroad says a lot about the shit you’ll support at home” so go on supporting a genocide then, democrats

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

Concession voting famously worked well with Hindenburg

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reminder that Reddit is overrun by AI these days

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

And the regular I isn't very I at all

[–] whiskers165@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

After Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and finally the Kamala Harris debacle I think the Democrats have proven beyond a shadow of doubt that they need a total reboot before there is any kind of unconditional support like, "vote blue". Even if you don't believe they are in on this with the Republicans the best case scenario is political malpractice, criminal negligence. They won't even run on policies that are popular with their base for fucks sake; how can you even be more angry with the nonvoters than the Democratic party itself?

Rationally wouldn't it be easier to petition a few thousand elected Democrats to run on an actually palatable platform than convince millions of apathetic voters to vote for something they don't believe in?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

If it's that easy to convince people, wouldn't it be easier to convince the handful of dems vs the millions with any moral fiber?

If you asked me would I rather walk 100 feet or 10 million feet, I'd pick the 100 feet cause that's a lot shorter, don't you think?

[–] Poophammer@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I love to vote for the kick the can down the road party, its much better than the anthropomorphic swastika riding a rascal party

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] save_vs_death@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

uhm, sweaty, we can care about 2 things at once

[–] SmithrunHills@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

So uh, who was president when you were supposedly "warning" us about the economic crisis?

"Don't start any litmus test at all" ohhh so you want Nazis in your team. Got it

[–] Guamer@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

Yes, yes, genocide is excusable to you, please face the wall

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

We will figure out what to do next AFTER the senate and congress is filled with democrats...

The fucker stole one of my go-to jokes and used it unironically! I posted the following just 14 hours ago - https://hexbear.net/comment/6855264

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fascinating part is always their vocabulary to me.

Yes, I too am often fascinated by the fact that someone managed to teach any of these mindless simpletons how to use words

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

And that's actionable.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

last time you had a congress and senate full of dems you lost it all to trump

[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago
[–] Salem@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

that thread got removed by mod and the comments bodied the poster

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

Wait if they consider this a purity politics thing in the first place then who cares if Trump wins? Where do they draw the line on what is or isn't acceptable? Whether the harm ends up harming us?

No litmus test literally means both sides pass.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

ngl, even if this was true (it isn't), i care more about people in the global south than i do about people in the imperial core

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

:maybe-later-kiddo:

load more comments
view more: next ›