QinShiHuangsShlong

Hence critical support.

Just on a seperate but commected sort of tangent from everything I've seen Amerikkkan and €uropean unions have already been subsumed by the capitalist machine and become simple labor mediators, an extension of corporate hr so honestly their destruction in their current form would be necessary anyway but I see where you're coming from.

Either way I was mostly memeing.

Taking Trump or any fascist leader to be the originator/nucleus/sustainer of fascism is greatman theory, that fascism lives or dies with a single leader. That’s liberal idealism.

Fascism arises from material conditions: capitalist crisis, imperial decline, petty-bourgeois collapse, and the absence of a strong proletarian movement. Trump like all the fascist leaders before him and the probably unfortunately many to come didn’t create those conditions, they emerged from them.

Removing a leader doesn’t resolve the contradictions that produced him. But it also doesn’t guarantee an immediate replacement either, because those contradictions express themselves unevenly and through struggle inside the ruling class itself.

Without organized proletarian opposition, those struggles will ultimately be resolved on capital’s terms, whether through a new figure, a restructured coalition, or expanded repression.

You’re purposefully misrepresenting what I said(lieing) to talk shit for internet points you loser fuck. I didn’t call you a liberal for acknowledging that Trump is popular or emotionally revered. That is obvious and not disputed. I called you a liberal because you argued that fascism is meaningfully sustained by an individual and that removing that individual would weaken and destroy the movement. That position is great-man theory and is reactionary.

Your argument is idealist. You locate the source of fascism in personality, charisma, loyalty, and perception rather than in material conditions, class alliances, institutions, and state power. Marxism holds that leaders emerge from contradictions. They do not create or sustain them. Treating consciousness and personality as the driver of history is liberal idealism.

You also reduce politics to personalization. Your analysis centers on who excites people emotionally instead of who controls courts, police, capital, media, and the coercive apparatus of the state. Fascism is not held together by vibes or devotion. It is held together by capitalist crisis and the institutions built to manage that crisis through repression.

Also your support of adventurism is reactionary. It substitutes spectacle for organization and individual acts for mass struggle. Historically, this path has never weakened fascism and has repeatedly strengthened it by justifying repression, consolidating ruling-class unity, and destroying real movements.

Appealing to what you “see with your eyes” does not resolve this. Fascist movements have always centered leaders. Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, and Pinochet were all revered figures. Their removal or death did not dismantle fascism. Those systems survived until their material bases were forcibly broken.

That is why I called your position liberal. Not as an insult, but because it replaces material analysis with personality fixation, substitutes individuals for systems, and treats political violence detached from organization as meaningful action. Marxism does not deny that fascists worship leaders. It explains why that worship is secondary and structurally replaceable.

If you take such issue with being called a lib try moving beyond being a radlib 白左 you pretentious arrogant fucking loser.

I have seen more intelligent thought from quarry stones.

I'm going to assume you're a jaded 20 something from a former soviet country who holds a grudge because his nazi grandfather was rightfully shot.

You should probably try investigating and applying analysis to things before spewing shit.

You realize even your beloved western propoganda sources know the party has a well over 80% approval rate right?

We all hate you idiotic 白左 losers. You don't need to just touch grass, you need to make love to the grass and have a happy grass family you fucking nerd.

Probably a mix of both but honestly I think it's largely irrelevant. She, BankmanFried and the rest of the board/exec ghouls would be shot in a just society.

Rare western leftist W but if they don't purge the weasels, rats and lib bootlicking fucks then it will likely amount to nothing.

$11bn in assets

Death penalty without reprieve is the least she and the rest of the scumbag execs deserve, but unfortunately that's not happening currently outside of China.

Silly tankie you just don't understand basic economics if we don't run the orphan crushing machine constantly then the imaginary line will stop going up

"never forgive" until the next guy comes around and they'll be in such a hurry they'll be tripping over themselves to whitewash Amerikkkan fascism and its supporters including Trump and his followers just like they did Obama, Clinton, Regan, Bush and all the rest.

China just doesn't feel the need immiserate the world while it does it to satisfy a sick need for an imaginary line to go up forever

Giving Amerikkka exactly what it deserves. 9/11 people worldwide agree.

Financialisation of even life itself was always the end goal of the capitalist machine.