this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
587 points (96.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36928 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"If you kill a killer the number of killers in the world is unchanged"

"So I should kill multiple killers"

"Hol' up"

[–] Koarnine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

Hol' up Wait a minute Kill that fash Put a brick in it

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

“Tonight’s the night….”

-Needlessly creepy breakfast montage plays-

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Okay here's an opinion that'll get me down voted to oblivion but here goes:

Violence is like symptom management. If you're hurting, seriously injured etc. get that morphine. But keep using it and it becomes dependency. It's a short term solution to one specific problem and rarely solves the underlying causes. Unless you can do that, you'll be back to using violence as symptom management. Only the next time you'll need more of it, just like heroin.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I get what you're saying, where you need more solutions to a problem than just violence if you want long term change, but the metaphor you used implies that violence should not be considered.

Violence isn't the answer, it's an answer, one of many.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Famously, the human rights gained by movements using violent tactics, such as the abolitionists, suffragettes, the civil rights movement, the ANC, were all very short-lived. Hollow victories, all.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Haiti should have just patiently waited to gain their independence.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you being sarcastic? Because we're still reaping the benefits of all of those. Violently gained interracial marriage got legalized at 25% public support while peacefully gained gay marriage only got legalized at 65% popular support. Peacefully won trans right are more fragile than violently won labor rights.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yes I was being sarcastic, and I should've made that clearer. I know of no other way of dealing with the smug sanctimonious attitude of those in rich peaceful countries demanding that the oppressed turn the other cheek because "violence bad". It's this bizarre combination of smugness, ignorance of history, and effective advocacy in favor of the oppressor that I really, really, cannot stand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"But I can't just KILL Ozai! wHaT aBoUt wHaT tHe mOnKs tAuGhT mE?" -The "hero" of the story lmfao

(yes I get it, it's supposed to be a kids show, but still...)

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

the thing is- Aang himself understands that his strict adherence to his values is not always a positive thing, i remember in one of the comics (or a later season) he outright calls it his own flaw

if not for the lion turtle giving him an alternative moments before, he'd have to either kill, or watch the world be destroyed

he later has to face that flaw again (actually this time) in the big graphic novels that came out, they're really good btw. give them a read if you have the time to spare

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think it'd be funny if the energy bending thing was given like a final "oh you actually don't have to kill" but then this power actual fails when the final battle comes... then Aang is like wtf and hesitates but then goes through a bit of internal mental battle and then finally finds the will to kill Ozai anyways and I feel like this would be better character development than a weak-ass oh I didn't kill anyone, just crippled him for life

Like you know those movie plot where a character is like "oh I'll be the bait and lure the enemy and you'll kill them" and promises they won't be in danger, then like when the plan goes through, it's revealed that that character's sacrifice was always necessary but they lied so its easier for that one empathetic character to go along with the plan. Like imagine the lion turtle actually did that instead, it'd be so much better as a plot.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

if Aang had to kill Ozai he wouldn't be smiling and waving after Zuko's coronation, he most likely wouldn't even decide to try again with Katara, the story would be forced to turn very dark, very fast, and would need to be given time and space to breathe

final minutes of the last episode are not the time to have a character break their core values, not without a season's worth of set up to get you to that point

[–] evol@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Korra is also like extremely lib pilled (THe entire message is like "Extremism is bad folks")

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They painted Anarchists as bad. But I say KILL THE EARTH MONARCH LMFAO. (Didn't even watch the whole thing, got too boring, so I just read the wikis)

The anarchists were trying to kill Korra and break the avatar cycle later on because reasons. Pretty sure they didn't want to risk another Kyoshi, which in all honesty valid. Also they kidnapped the new air nomads but I think that was so they could kidnap Korra so... Yeah.

Legit I think Korra would've joined them had they not started fucking with her, especially since outside of Zuko, Tenzin, and her own father damned near every person in power she encountered was a damned fine example of why they were right.

Legend of Korra fucked up by making every one of the bad guys except season 2s somewhat reasonable. Amon was a hypocrite but not necessarily wrong from a historical point of view (Dai lee, fire nation), the Red Lotus were just anarchists who went a bit far, and I got bored with season 4 so I can't remember anything about Earth Nation female Bismarck.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah instead he did the moral thing… permenantly disabling him?

[–] epicthundercat@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Naw write then a STRONGLY worded letter. That would have fixed Hitler and Mussolini.

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

Write a strongly worded letter, and then tell your nonspeaking autistic manservant that you want to become a superhero. You can pretend to be a cowardly dandy and your assistant can pretend to be deaf with an intellectual disability.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is silly. Everyone knows, historically, you stop opressors by asking nicely. Maybe go into the street in a funny costume or something, organize a singalong. Violence is what the baddies do.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nonviolent resistance exists, been explained before, & has been done before. It also takes more courage.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Couldn't read it, was stuck in an endless loop of age verification.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] s23b@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's about the least Iroh thing to say. Congrats for the quality shitpost I guess.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

He wouldn't word it that way, and he wouldn't suggest that killing is universally the best way to go about it, but this is not the least likely thing that could come out of his mouth, as another commenter pointed out "Azula is crazy, and needs to go down". Even as he turned down the team's request to defeat Ozai, he made it clear that it could only end in death, "brother killing brother". He was under no illusion that capturing Ozai was ever an option.

Do you think that the white lotus took back Ba Sing Se without killing anyone with those 100-foot-tall walls of fire? No, you don't expel an occupying force by just cutting the tips off of some spears. Avatar shows us the least-bloody parts of the recapture, but do not mistake Iroh's depiction in a kids' series for pacifism. Iroh is very clear, vocally, that violence is necessary in some cases. He teaches zuko to redirect lightning to send it back at the person who launched it, as he says "to use your opponent's energy against them". He prefers nonlethal methods, but that doesn't mean he refuses to employ deadly force. He and his friends use heavy fire against enemy metal tanks, which would boil alive the soldiers inside. They use rocks to stop up the holes through which benders were actively shooting fire, which would rebound and fill the tank with that same conflagration. Those tanks get shot up hundreds of feet in the air and have hard landings on top of one another, which would not only concuss anyone inside to death, but would crush all of the tanks on the bottom. Iroh literally starts the liberation of Ba Sing Se with a fire blast large enough to completely obliterate the titanic wall, as well as everyone previously depicted positioned directly behind it, in an instant. He doesn't know how many soldiers lie behind that wall. He just destroys it, sight-unseen.

Iroh is not a pacifist, he is just very selective in his use of deadly force.

[–] BambiDiego@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

It's not the least Iron thing to say. Even he said "Azula is crazy, and she needs to go down."

Maybe not kill, but definitely take down and away from wider society to live in a dark, small place.

[–] s@piefed.world 8 points 2 days ago

It’s Iroh-nic, don’t you think?

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 20 points 2 days ago (12 children)

sips tea Ah … come, sit with me for a moment. The tea is hot, and such questions are best answered slowly, with a warm belly.

It is natural to feel anger when one has been wronged. Even the gentlest river becomes violent when dammed for too long. But we must be careful, my friend, not to mistake the force of our feelings for the wisdom of our actions.

You ask why one should not kill their oppressors. The answer is not because they are strong, nor because they deserve mercy, nor because the world would punish you. It is because when you choose to do evil in the name of justice, you quietly invite that evil to live inside you. And once it is settled there, it does not leave easily.

You may believe you are striking only your enemy, but violence has a poor sense of direction. It spills into the soul, changing the person who wields it. The moment you decide that a “good reason” excuses a cruel act, you teach your heart that cruelty can be justified. Soon, it will begin to justify itself.

Oppression is a heavy chain, but hatred forges a second one, but this time around your own spirit. If you destroy another to feel free, you may discover that freedom never arrived, and only the destruction remained. True victory is not standing over your enemy’s body. True victory is refusing to become what hurt you. It is choosing a path that allows you to look at yourself in the mirror without turning away. The right reasons lose their meaning when they are carried by wrong actions. Like tea made with poisoned water, no matter how fine the leaves, the cup will only bring sickness.

So no - do not kill your oppressors. Not for their sake, but for yours. Because the most important battle is not against them, but against the part of yourself that believes goodness can be built from blood.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Machiavelli would disagree.

Also the video does make a good point that "winning by being good" is inherently tied to Western thoughts/culture and Iroh may have a different perspective being Eastern coded. And also being like, an ex general, and using violence at the end of the show....

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Iroh is not a pacifist. He is just very selective about the use of deadly force.

Iroh tries to teach zuko how to kill his enemies unflinchingly with "cold-blooded" lightning, and when that fails, teaches zuko to redirect lightning, which he knows is, and makes clear to be, explicitly deadly force, "to turn your enemy's energy against them". He acknowledges that, if he were to defeat Ozai, it would be "brother killing a brother", because there was no realistic world in which Ozai could be contained without leading to his death. He accepts that his granddaughter "is crazy and needs to go down".

When he chooses to take back Ba Sing Se, does he go in covertly and retake the puppet state from the occupying troops by forcing a surrender or a diplomatic solution? No, his opening move is to generate the largest ball of fire possible, then hurl it at the titanic wall, which not only does the camera show us has many people behind it, but which Iroh is ready to obliterate, soldiers and all, sight unseen. He does what must be done. Violence is his last resort, but he clearly has no moral compunction against using violence against the violent. Deadly force is met with a redirecting blow, carrying that same energy or more. In the first season, when he believes the fate of the world hangs in the balance, he threatens and uses deadly force "tenfold" that which is exacted upon the moon spirit. There is nowhere in the show that Iroh says that death is never the solution. The only reason we don't see the deaths of the many soldiers occupying Ba Sing Se at Iroh's hands (as well as all of the other times he has caused soldiers to be buried under their own boulders, breathed fire into their faces, or otherwise used violent infernos to defeat enemies) is that it was depicted in a kids' show. The only person in the series who maintains that deadly force is never the answer is Aang. Aang only manages it in the finale by Deus Ex Machina because he's the chosen one (and the protagonist of a kids' show).

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 14 points 2 days ago

Nah, fuck that. What are they supposed to do? Roll over and continue being oppressed? End your oppression not just for your sake but for the sake of everyone else whom they may oppress too.

[–] maga_is_death@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

This is a fantasy land take that has no basis in reality or human history. At some point, it becomes a matter of physical well being for yourself and those around you. Telling people to just suck it up and take a beating/killing for the benefit of their "soul"...my god. Rejoin the real world buddy. It can be a scary place, but at least it's real, not whatever bizarro world you are speaking from.

You let bullies walk on you, and they will keep doing it. The only thing that will stop them is letting them know that they will pay a real price if they keep at it. Trying to spin this "peace at all costs" worldview is intellectually dishonest and counterproductive.

[–] orwellianlocksmith@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, those in power always preach peace to preserve the status quo. But what about the suffragettes? The black Panthers? What about the Italian resistance? What about the Warsaw ghetto uprising?

Sometimes it's not about our souls, not about our own psychical wellbeing. It's about the liberation of all. About justice. About making the bastards pay. About showing the world that there's a limit to what people can be made to do and suffer.

Violence is the last resort of the desperate, no doubt. It's not fun. It does taint. It's fucking tragic.

But we are living in increasingly desperate times. Who can deny that? And its just not about us as individuals anymore. That's the message here.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, those in power always preach peace to preserve the status quo.

Those in power are interested in provoking violence to delegitimize a cause. Violence is their playbook: they know to how to retaliate against violence with violence. Repressing nonviolent resistance, however, backfires: when the government's illegitimate violence is harder to contest, more people condemn the government’s use of force and shift their support away from the regime. Nonviolence is harder to deal with, attracts people, and leads to “defections” within institutions sustaining authoritarian regimes.

Such movements are statistically more effective at combatting authoritarianism than violent resistance. Where violence fails, nonviolence has succeeded in overcoming oppression & authoritarian rule. This documentary covers multiple instances of that happening in the 20th century in India, USA, South Africa, Denmark, Poland, Chile.

It takes greater courage to resist injustice nonviolently. Plus, you may have seen the post months ago on research that shows nonviolent protest is more successful than the alternative.

The message is that intuition is fallible, and we should follow the historical evidence & research.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 29 points 2 days ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Hlodwig@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Bruh, you dont even have to use violence, if everyone stopped working, paying taxes and consuming anything that the bare minimum for survival, the country would collapse in less than a month.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›