this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
247 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5228 readers
1389 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And you can make them more lopsided! (It was at 95% no when I checked)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

They literally can't help themselves lol

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 3 hours ago

Ah this warms my heart ❤️

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago

There are people genuinely believe that they want to handle all personal data to AI and it would be good for them. However, those people tend not to use DDG. So it's self-selecting the audience.

[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 64 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

"We don't all feel the same way about AI."

Literally 95% of users: uh, yeah we kinda do.

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Nice. 94-6% now with over 18,000 votes.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Same but at 29k just now

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 103 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly, I'm surprised. Was expecting something close to 50/50 or maybe 40% yes, 60% no but this is hilarious and heartening:

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 83 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You'd probably get a closer split with the general population, but for a search engine mainly used by privacy-conscious people and those wanting to get away from Google's bullshit, it makes sense.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly, it was probably an ad in disguise. You want AI? We've got it! Don't want that bullshit? That's cool, we're not gonna shove it down your throat.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago

An ad that actually tells you some info after asking for info is honestly refreshing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's a little ironic because all the searches just go through Microslop's bullshit instead. Yes, DuckDuckGo is just Bing wearing a duck hat.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 17 points 17 hours ago

Better a proxy for Bing than Bing itself

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 8 points 19 hours ago

Currently same split showing, 96% against, 4% for, but with just over 5400 votes. :)

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Did my part.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 35 points 18 hours ago

Encase anyone wants the ddg no ai option https://noai.duckduckgo.com/

[–] LovableBastard@slrpnk.net 44 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure I’m surprised. Besides the reasons other people mentioned, I think there’s another factor influencing it.

I suspect a lot of “Yes AI” voters are really thinking “well, it’s kinda neat”. But us “No AI” voters are really thinking “HELL NO!!! Under no circumstances do we want AI!”

I’m guessing that makes us a lot more motivated to respond.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

To add to that, those saying yes are acting almost materialistically, “why not have more when it’s free”.

I am genuinely curious what percentage of the mainstream population is willing to pay for AI.

Something tells me we are finding out soon.

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I know several middle school teachers that have been paying for ChatGPT for a couple years now. There are a lot more, I would imagine.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago

I thought ai was all free as they grew market share? Just for advanced features?

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 45 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"Thanks for voting — You’d rather skip AI. With DuckDuckGo, you can, because it’s optional."

It shouldn't even be an option, AI Has no fucking business being shoved into anything. Just stop.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Honestly, this comment and the link to a separate URL specifically for our kind was the first time I have felt negative towards DDG. Clearly whoever wrote that had gone through a couple of passes of softening the language because they were overly defensive toward the no-AI crowd.

Maybe make the 96% crowd the default and the 4% option opt-in.

[–] dp@thebrainbin.org 33 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting that your's says 'live public ai vote in the US' but mine (not in the US) just says 'live public ai vote'

Wonder why

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm in the US and mine says "live AI public vote". I'm on mobile though. Maybe that makes a difference.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 10 points 16 hours ago

Proud "no" voter chiming in.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 33 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It has made my experience with DDG immeasurably worse. It's not necessarily that the results are bad, but the performance impact is completely unacceptable.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 16 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Don't use the AI then. That's kind of the point of this poll/marketing-campaign, to show it can easily be turned off for DDG.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 54 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

NoAI should be the default version and the people that want it can go to ai.duckduckgo(.)com

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 11 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, absolutely.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 15 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Currently the default is the AI being on. It’s why I personally changed search engines for my browser because I don’t want the damn AI

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Same here. I'm using noai.duckduckgo.com as the default address and it's working great for me, should you ever decide to return. Some slop articles get through but not many and now I get no AI images at all as far as I can tell. I also have the huge AI blocklist going so I couldn't tell you which is helping more, but it never stopped the AI images and noai.duckduckgo.com absolutely does.

Some AI pics truly creep me out; it's that uncanny valley thing. For me a hint of it is somehow even worse than having an image that is obviously, overtly AI. It is such a relief to open an image search and not see a bunch of unnatural shite that only puts the hair on the back of my neck up.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

I was hoping that block list was going to include AI generated articles. It's just images though sadly. I don't like the use of AI images, but they also generally don't waste my time. When I read an article, only to realize it's made up AI bullshit, that wastes a lot of time.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's fair. Just wanted to point it out to the user I replied to, who seemingly still uses it but doesn't realize they don't need to have that worse experience.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Unless one makes sure to stay logged into DDG you’re always going to get the default. So for all intents and purposes yeah you do “need.” To use the worst experience.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Nope. It saves your settings across searches. You can also use https://noai.duckduckgo.com/, no need to login.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago) (1 children)

It can't save your settings if you're using incognito or block all cookies etc. (edit: so I'm using the noai link from now on)

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 1 points 21 minutes ago

Sure, in which case you can just use the alternate URL.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

I think we have a misunderstanding. I am referring to duckduckgo.com. Not the no ai version.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 13 points 19 hours ago

Uh-oh, nobody show this to Jensen Huang, it would break his little heart.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Remember what you saw before the results will be "fixed".

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

FR I can see the AI Tech Bros working on a bot to submit votes as we speak.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It'll crash all day and probably never work right.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Then start applying votes to no, apologizing and vowing to do better, only to resume applying no votes.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago

I don't need a pin. I put my vote in. It's 97-3 now on my screen with 1072 votes in... is lemmy 1% of this sample now?

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 7 points 20 hours ago

It's currently at 97% No, because I just visited it to get the link to a No AI DuckDuckGo. As those gassed up LLMs known as "AI" are a blight upon the tech space, so many CEOs are making the world a sloppier place; what's worse some people are buying in to this "AI" nonsense. 🤬

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 18 hours ago

Funny. I just started looking into Kagi because Duck Duck Go's AI results have completely ruined the search engine.

load more comments
view more: next ›