Sarcsam aside, personally, I think the fact that our law reflects our prejudices is more racist than the actual means that we use to enforce them, which is a pretty high bar to clear.
Once you get to an 88 person polycule, I start to wonder about upper limits. Could all of humanity just be one big polycule? That actually might... be awesome?
It depends on what you mean by "on purpose." You didn't mean to hit that light pole, but there was a lot of intentionality around the decision to drive and the decision to build a car-based society that is very much "on purpose" and the effect of that is deaths due to cars.
Because it's illegal, duh. Once you enshrine your prejudices in law, they're no longer racism, they're just moral purity.
We need UBI for pets
You gotta think the loons are not feeling great going in to the locker room right after a goal like that
I’m pretty sure computers do a better job of managing the clutch and the regenerative brakes and stuff, but we need to give more things to drivers to do to help keep them focused and engaged if we’re going to continue to allow them to operate automobiles.
Maybe eliminating cars would prevent cops from being able to fabricate traffic incidents to make ticket and arrest quotas?
Aw, I guess I’m getting old. I still think of him as the 15 year old he was when he played in ccl. Still, Busquets shouldn’t have hit him, regardless of how ineffectual the actual punch was.
Sorry, I don’t know why the graphic says swipe; I can only find sources that have a single image.
@LiveThreadBot@sopuli.xyz -football Colorado Rapids - Minnesota United
Oh, I guess ha ha you really owned me by pretending to care about sports so you can clown on me about etymology or whatever. I’m just super upset that I got to talk about my favorite sport in the context of its entrance into the English language and its place in 19th century British class structure on the internet.
My Sounders are at three; where’s your team?
There’s something very Ender’s Game about all this…