this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
64 points (93.2% liked)

movies

2463 readers
223 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ecvanalog@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s easy to joke about, but I feel like this is a microcosm of the problems plaguing Hollywood. The notion that a franchise routinely closing in on $2B a movie at the box office is somehow not profitable speaks to how absolutely unhinged the budgets are going in.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 4 points 13 hours ago

Everything about movies is just stupid. Napoleon dynamite cost 400k to make. Half of that money went into the jamiroquai song. Marketing for a movie costs more than a movie used to cost. A movie made 10 million dollars? Absolute failure. People like the rock get paid 50million per movie to just be there. I really hope Hollywood just collapses

[–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago

He could make blue giant dildos for merch, and simultaneously go fuck himself with one of those.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

I have an idea: cut the film length in half, remove the warfare and turn it into a nature documentary.

My mom really likes the movies, so I went with her to the cinema. I like the progress in CGI and have read their papers on water rendering a bunch of times, and I can feel myself getting immersed when things start off. They are beautiful worlds with so much creativity!

And then the warfare starts and it all turns into a CGI mess with no story value. Such a disappointment.

[–] mthomsonkiwi@piefed.social 12 points 22 hours ago

Would making the movies cheaper translate into cheaper ticket prices? My local is $26 a ticket now. It's ridiculous! I'm not going to see everything that comes out when it costs that much, and we've got access to streaming now.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or, hear me out, you could use your impressive creativity to make other non-Avatar movies that are beloved classics like you were making before Avatar.

The indiginous species have been oppressed by the shitty humans for 3 movies now. WE GET IT.

[–] johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They also had the same bad guy for 3 movies...

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And he got away again, I couldn't believe it!

[–] ftp@feddit.uk 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wait for real?! Good thing I didn’t bother to watch 3 yet, after the end of 2 was just setting up yet another rematch.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Yep. Many parts of 3 were a literal repeat of 2, including whale hunting, a big showdown at the water village, and Quarritch AGAIN gets away at the end.

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 6 points 21 hours ago

If James Cameron's; Muppet Avatar: The Way of Fuzz happens, I might never watch any other movie, ever again.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hear me out … don’t produce another

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s preparing everyone for an AI announcement, isn’t he?

[–] mastod0n@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

It definitely sounds like that to me.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Avatar, one of the most profitable film franchises in history, needs to cut costs?

[–] Janx@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If there's a single dollar giant corporations and billionaires don't have, they'll destroy your life to get it. That's why their limitless greed is so dangerous to everyone, it's quite literally never enough...

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This one only brought in 1.2 billion dollars so far. It's only the 29th highest grossing film of all time!

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

It took two whole days to break a billion dollars! That's like an eternity!

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 29 points 1 day ago

He could just stop making them? There's a thought 🤔.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Is this a story that needs telling?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

It was a fucking Trilogy man.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude it’s okay, you can stop, in fact many of us prefer you do

[–] simsalabim@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

As long as it makes as much money as it does, I think we're in the minority.

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cut the runtime by a third?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

He and the studio will just use this as a pretext to use AI.

Easily done:

  1. Wait for AI bubble to burst
  2. Buy render farm on the cheap
  3. Avatar 4

Although I'm assuming that the raw rendering pipeline is what costs the most. I could be dead wrong about that - there's a whole army of artists, technical people, and actors that go into such a production too.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 16 points 1 day ago

has he tried volunteering on set ? or perhaps a bake sale like US schools ?

[–] Limerance@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Make the next Avatar movie happen all inside one cave. From time to time messengers arrive from the outside and bring news.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (10 children)

The last one made over 1 billion. It is more accurate to say everyone wants more Avatar movies.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I guess they should can them and put the money into smaller original projects then... No? Just an excuse to fire most of the CGI contractors and replace them with AI?

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

This should be a fun thread

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

hasn't all the technology already got cheaper???

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Not cheap enough, he should wait another 20 years

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Source Engine?

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is everyone saying he'll use AI? Boring or not, he did make visually amazing movies with cgi. What makes you think he'll cheat?

load more comments
view more: next ›