TribblesBestFriend

joined 11 months ago

Not American, one of my friends is in the army and said to me « you don’t want to be on patrol with the American, they get you killed because they play fucking cowboys »

Look like a housing crisis with more steps

 

Classique.

I’m happy to bring it back if it comes with the political landscape of the time, it was shit but better than what we have now

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think the neo-Soviet are discountinued, are they not ?

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I remember this game, at the time I was sooo in love at the models but when I had scrapped enough cash to buy some the game was discontinued 😭

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And a Towel

Be safe out there

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ok I understand that but so far, all in savage capitalist cities have gone belly up

So in the now (as opposed to to the glum future) who is benefiting from doing again and again a failed project ?

Look at seafaring, they build their prototype, it sank and their valuation tank like ice cream in the sun but people are still investing in shit like that.

Maybe I’m failing to see a detail but from where I am none of the investor got anything, they only lose and we know that capitalist hate to lose money.

 

I understand that promoting the idea in right wing sphere could bring you a load of money. The same way that fire festival brought a lot of money to the guy at the top.

But when built each experiment have gone belly up and nothing could be salvaged off.

So how the right wing grifter are benefiting from building an actual freedom cities ? What I’m missing here ?

 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/24287458

I don't usually keep the author's name in the suggested hed, but here I think he's recognizable enough that it adds value.

I am a science-fiction writer, which means that my job is to make up futuristic parables about our current techno-social arrangements to interrogate not just what a gadget does, but who it does it for, and who it does it to.

What I do not do is predict the future. No one can predict the future, which is a good thing, since if the future were predictable, that would mean we couldn’t change it.

Now, not everyone understands the distinction. They think science-fiction writers are oracles. Even some of my colleagues labor under the delusion that we can “see the future”.

Then there are science-fiction fans who believe that they are reading the future. A depressing number of those people appear to have become AI bros. These guys can’t shut up about the day that their spicy autocomplete machine will wake up and turn us all into paperclips has led many confused journalists and conference organizers to try to get me to comment on the future of AI.

That’s something I used to strenuously resist doing, because I wasted two years of my life explaining patiently and repeatedly why I thought crypto was stupid, and getting relentlessly bollocked by cryptocurrency cultists who at first insisted that I just didn’t understand crypto. And then, when I made it clear that I did understand crypto, they insisted that I must be a paid shill.

This is literally what happens when you argue with Scientologists, and life is just too short. That said, people would not stop asking – so I’m going to explain what I think about AI and how to be a good AI critic. By which I mean: “How to be a critic whose criticism inflicts maximum damage on the parts of AI that are doing the most harm.”

 
 
 
 

Just after unionisation

In response to a question from CBC News, Leduc-Labelle said the restructuring exercise began "well before the start of the unionization process within the studio in June 2025."

Yeah and my ass is chicken

 

With the explosion of « Pro man » podcaster and Masculinity poser I find it important to revisit some movies that talk about hyper masculinity

937
US of A (startrek.website)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 
  1. Je suis pas d’accord avec le titre
  2. vous en pensez quoi vous autres ? Sur-analyse ou elle voit des diables partout ?
view more: next ›