When all this is over, media lying about shit needs be made legally vulnerable to very simple defamation cases by any party they lie about. Fox news as it exists today should hemmorage money in a just society.
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
222 points (95.5% liked)
News
34227 readers
3279 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They are legally vulnerable. The problem is that libel/defamation requires several specific tests to prove, some of which often dont apply to such situations.
-
They have to make a factual assertion that is demonstrably untrue. It cant be just an opinion. (This one heavily depends on the specifics what is claimed)
-
It must be publicated or otherwise spread to a third party. (This one obviously is the easiest test in this case)
-
The claim must clearly be of and concerning the plaintiff, i.e. the one claiming to have been defamed. (Again, this one depends. When they are talking about "these people", "the protesters", etc. but not specific individuals, this gets very hard to prove they were even including any specific individuals)
-
If the person claiming defamation is a public figure, they have to prove they either knew their claim was untrue or that they had a reckless disregard for the truth. If they are a private figure they have to prove that they at least acted with negligence when making their claim, meaning they didnt take reasonable steps to verify information. (This can also be a sticking point as they may claim that they had "good sources," like the federal government, that verified their claims)
-
The claim has to have caused actual damages to the person, such as if their livelihood was harmed or receiving death threats. It can't just be their feelings hurt or people being mad at them. (Again, situational for the people, their job, their situation, and the reactions of others.
Personally I think actual damages is a bad bar because that depends on factors beyond the defamer's actions. I think the bar should be the reasonabulity of the risk of damages, instead. Like they should've known calling someone a looter may lose them a job, regardless of whether the actually lose a job or even had one already, right?
But anyway, a lot of the lies they tell have just enough wiggle room to claim that it fails on at least one of these tests. Like maybe they weren't make a specific claim of fact was demonstrably untrue, or they were stating opinion but phrasing it as fact. Or maybe they made a claim about the actions of a group that was true of some, but not all of them. Or maybe they made specific claims of criminal activity and get to claim they verified it with a "reliable" source, like the DOJ or FBI. Or maybe the person can't prove material damages were caused from the defamation. And then of course, in all of these cases, the defamed must actually seek out justice by bringing suit against the defamers, which plenty do have the money, time or know-how to do.
I highly doubt that any justice will come at scale after this unless huge class action suits are filed, but the Supreme Court has weakened class actions too.
Fox News should be forbidden by law.
You can't call yourself a news organization and lie so transparently all the time. Make it a requirement that news organizations must by law factual
Fox News would disappear on day 1
Fox news already admitted (multiple times) that their programs are not news, and that no sane person would consider it news.
I think we need a law that says if a media organization is guilty of intentionally spreading fake news, that they need to spend an equal amount of time and effort on correcting the story.
So if fox spent 4 years spreading disinfo about the 2020 election, then they need to spend 4 years, on the same timeslots, broadcasts, and webpages, reporting that they intentionally spread disinfo.
Also, they should have to run a "surgeon general anti-smoking" style banner on all their programming that says "FOX INSISTS THAT THEIR CONENT IS NOT NEWS AND DOES NOT ACCURATELY REPORT FACTS AND CONTEXT."
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine that Ronald Reagan's administration revoked.
Let me get this straight: He's threatening to attack Iran to protect their violent protesters, while simultaneously threatening American citizen protesters for peacefully exercising their Constitutional 1st Amendment Rights?
Don’t forget Greenland. And Venezuela. And Mexico.
and Canada.
The difference is that he's vowing to protect the Iranian protesters, while also vowing to kill American protesters.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Much, much less information in the article than the title suggests. If you haven’t read it yet, don’t bother.
I mean, it is a US media publication, they are all useless these days.
None of them have a spine left, they are all controlled by oligarchs that are colluding with Trump or Thiel one way or another and they have completely normalized this insanity.
I mostly get my US news from CBC and BBC World these days - US media is done.
The handful of media companies are such conglomerates they have so many issues that lawmakers could affect and multiple ways that they are too afraid to call out and administration willing to retaliate. All of them though, even the New York Times gave up preemptively even though I do not think they are a conglomerate. I think Israel broke their brain. And or their editor and owners were fucking children with Epstein.
The NYT has been broken for a hundred years. They published pro-Hitler, anti-Jewish articles during WWII as well. More recently, they were informed 24 hours in advance of the kidnapping of Maduro (along with the Washington Post) and sat on that information.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Also hes already invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy the Marines in LA which was shot down in court, so same shit different day.
It's like they had AI summarize Wikipedia.
It means he is fucking scared. He knows he is unpopular af.
That dumbshit can't understand that throwing that kind of gas onto the fire this early into the fascist takeover is just what it would take to wake up Americans.
I doubt it but I admire your optimism
I've long suspected that the only chance the US, and the world, has is the incompetence of the Trump administration.
The danger is that the organized "opposition" party is the Democrats, and Americans are slow to realize that if any significant change is to be made, it won't involve the Dems much (though they might go along, once someone else has taken all the big risks and done the heavy lifting).
is just what it would take to wake up Americans.
LOL. Did Americans wake up when the National Guard killed and stabbed students in 1970?
DO IT!
And while you are at it, invade Greenland, Canada and Iran.
Then cancel the midterms.
You know you want to Trump!
So I dare you, DO IT!
To all of the good Americans who want to live in a world with alliances based on mutual respect and friendship, in a country that respects the rule of law and democratic principles... Keep fighting, ramp it up, they're getting scared. Do not let up.
Keep protesting and keep being adversarial to the regime in all non-violent methods. Just don't react with violence. He sees that the public has turned on him for his immigration policies so he is trying to instigate violence to win back the public.
Nothing much, hes already murdering civilians and the gestapo is already oppressing us. He is also going to do this anyway. Get organized. Resist.
Why does the article say "clashes between federal agents and members of the community" and not "clashes between federal agents and citizens"?
Adversarial Journalism! Someone needs to tell this man he's a cunt to his face and he has bad ideas and his cronies are butt lickers, on television.
We already know he can't hack confrontation, he melts down if he thinks a lesser is badmouthing him. Do it on live TV, consistently! Bully him, don't let him get a word in, tell him he's a nasty man, a rapist, and a cunt, and his dad thought so too.
Get in his face, make him sweat.
Once you start punishing people for insurrection you end up with a insurrection.
Oh, he’s going to do the thing he’s been planning on doing anyway? Real scary.
Tbh I’m a bit surprised he didn’t try this at some point last year
I mean he just intends to keep escalating and then do it anyway. It honestly doesn't matter how we respond, he's going to do it. Violence is the only thing he knows, and it makes him even angrier to be ignored or not get the violent response he wants.
This is a man who Bill Barr had to dangle the prospect of killing death row inmates like keys to a toddler to keep Trump focused on anything at all. He needed the "treat" of getting to kill someone just to be able to focus at all, and that was before he had completely succumbed to dementia.
He's got to time it right. The primary objective is to cancel the Midterm election, and it can't happen too soon, or the courts will have time to thwart the scheme. One thing he's good at is manipulating the court schedule, so he needs to take steps in the right order, at the right time.
He needs to suspend the election around mid-October, which means he needs to have a crescendo of violence through the Summer to lead to that, so he needs to call for National Martial Law across America at the beginning of Summer, and he's going to warm us up for it by invoking the Insurrection Act over the next few months, and he's warming us for that by threatening us today.
We're pretty much right on schedule.
load more comments
(11 replies)
He is the equivalent of having a sovereign citizen as president.
He makes them look sane
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›