Contradictions baby. Contradictions everywhere.
news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
Let me guess, the whole thing is made up because Tim Walz dared to volunteer to be part of the controlled opposition side…and of course that pathetic wimp is going to lie there and take it.
My bet is that Walz tries as hard as he can to do an Obama by giving a "This is not who we are" speech. It's filled with emotion but it is not impassioned. After all - he needs to appeal "moderate" GOP voters. It's full of soaring yet entirely empty rhetoric. Of course - it has zero actionable plans. In fact - he doesn't even hint at what his state and the dems could do.
Bluesky libs are furious with him so he retreats to Twitter. His Bluesky activity becomes an autopilot afterthought. Some months later he tries to do a Clinton by appearing on a talk show with a winning yet consolatory vibe. Slick Willie was unctuous but he had winning charm and could play the saxophone. Unslick Timmy tries to capture that magic by "surprising" his host by bringing out a melodica and the host - don't you know - asks the audience "Do you wanna hear him play? Dontcha? I do!" Somehow the house band already perfectly knows the parts of the song he plays. It's some current crappy and generic pop hit. He makes a few flubs. The mistakes are supposed to be endearing. The applause is surprisingly tepid.
He says both of his kids love the song. Actually they don't love it at all. It was picked by his consultants as being most "appropriate". His second effort at capturing old-school and dated dem glory is also a big failure. Reddit sleuths discover his kids don't even know the name of the singer they are suppose to love. Walz is roasted all over social media as a ginormous phony. All his social media account posts become mechanical and stale.
Daily he checks in with his consultants who are forced to tell him his metrics are "challenging". They are lying to him and he knows they are but he thanks just the same for every update. His numbers are in the effing toilet! For months on end he is not seen in public anywhere. He's too busy crying into his soup about his nearly non-existent 2028 presidential nom chances. How did thing go so wrong? Why didn't his consultants' advice work? They sure get paid enough - hand-over-fucking-fist.
You are being extremely optimistic with the whole Walz becoming unpopular thing. Progressive libs have locked onto him and will not give him up unless he like slaughters a puppy on live TV or something. Trump praising his fascist use of the National Guard during BLM wasn't enough to turn them off. And they'll gladly look the other way when he does it again, talk show appearances or no.
I remember watching the VP debate on the hextube, and Tim was just doing “yes, and” to JD’s ethnic cleansing plans for 90 minutes. Libs truly have the memory of cheez whiz.
They'll give up on him the second it looks like he's gonna lose, and they'll all rally behind Gruesome Newsom
LOL. Yeah, fair. With two reactionary fucks who just happen to still keep the mask on, how to choose?
Yo that's a civil war
(Edited addendum: adding this about 40 minutes into the post. I'll say it may be hyperbolic to call this exact instance the shot that pops it off, but this being the ongoing policy, and likely going to ramp up as he keeps getting away with it, will almost assuredly cause a violent conflict between opposing state and fed factions in the US)
That's almost assuredly why walz dropped, he didn't want his state to get fucking sanctioned lmao
It's over baby
Other states are going to ally with each other as they do more of this shit, bam you've yourself at least two different fucking countries
Motherfucking fed just sent it's troops into minnesota, started killing and arresting citizens with explicit denouncement from the state, and is now sanctioning them
That is a war.
States have their own national guards, watch. Minnesota busts there's out, another state offers support from their own, and you've got a chain reaction
That is a war.
It'll be an odd war. Fascists on one side. The people (leftists and some liberals) on the other. Meanwhile the democratic party will be in the stands watching doing fucking nada to help. Yet they'll be lecturing the people "violence is not the answer" and nagging people endlessly to donate as they proclaim the next election is the most important of our lifetime. Centrists will openly lurch to the right as they assume a massive victory for the fascists. Matty will have a unpaywalled article setting the tone. Fascism: Different places have different forms of government and it's OK.
In all seriousness - Schumer and Jeffries won't even discuss cutting ICE's budget.
Eh I doubt it.
Look to history. As much terrorism and violence as the right did over the civil rights era when the US federal government used some level of strong-arm tactics including deploying troops, siccing the FBI on them, etc, etc the people murmured and murmured in rage and then exactly nothing happened. Their politicians raged at the podium, they raged in the papers, they raged on TV and then nothing happened.
That's exactly what will happen this time. Trump will beat down Democratic opposition while at least half of Democratic voters cry foul for their party not standing up to him and the liberals and ourselves will seethe and rage. And there will be teeth gnashing and fiery speeches in the press and protests. But nothing will happen.
This isn't going to cause the US to break apart. It's not going to be civil war 2.0. It won't cause alliances of states. It won't result in challenges to federal power. It'll result in Trump bowling over opposition to implement what he wants and then Dems once back in power refusing to use those levers of power he just used so effectively because of muh norms and need to rebuild civility and blah blah blah. Democratic voter-base rage and anger will simmer but not boil over. Not over this.
But the Civil Rights Act did eventually pass - the rage never quite boiled over because it got channeled into realizing something. Even if it was kinda the bare minimum and did nothing to address all the violent state repression that precipitated it, there was at least a clear legal victory that let people feel some relief.
Where is that relief for this? All I see is the pressure getting ratcheted up for a few years, the circle of people who don't feel precarity constricts faster. And when the Dems eventually take office, they'll put the funding back in place^[though, what this does to Minnesota's agriculture in the meantime...]. Pretend like ICE is different now. The usual song and dance. Pressure will get notched down, but nothing is done to fully abate it -- let alone deal with the stress fractures.
Yes, this isn't The Thing that kicks off a big decisive Event in the history books. But its also hard not to see it as a threshold of some sort. There is almost certainly not going to be a direct, legal challenge to federal power... but maybe we see a scattered, piecemeal decoupling. Some states start to develop a trajectory that, in time, becomes increasingly unrelated to that of the overall federal government. Not out of a conscious choice, but simply by necessity and circumstance.
It's the official start of the bleeding Kansas period, at least.
Ok well Minnesota can tell them to get the fuck out of their buildings.
Any state can passively withdraw support to federal organisations, and the federal government actually relies of state infrastructure to function.
That moves requires +0 in materialist thinking, I assume most US governors have -6
Man, if only we had a party in power that respected state's rights...
This sounds like a big deal, like one of those weeks where decades happen
Been idly wondering if I was gonna see the United States balkanize in my lifetime. Didn't think it would start this decade...
(by the way, keep an eye Colorado River water rights)
Did not expect Minnesota to be the catalyst
Yeah... We're balkanizing.
I fucking hope so. Get it over with and then maybe China can come in and modernize my region. I want HSR between the major cities around here so I can visit friends more and local trains so I don't have to fucking drive. Each city has middling transit of its own and there is technically a rail line connecting them but it's abysmally slow (worse than driving) and only has 2 departures per day. Meanwhile, tier three cities in China are getting like a hundreds kms of rail built in under 5 years 
If you want to will this into reality, it is critical that you educate yourself and those around you about the indigenous history of your land, lest you simply reproduce a settler-colonial entity (but smaller?)
Just wait until Minnesota nationalizes(?) its farms. Minnesotan SSR 2026 here we come.
The technical term would be municipalization, although in the us this can also mean the creation of a sub-county level municipality where their previously was none.
If the 2nd American revolution starts in Minnesota, they'll never let Wisconsin live it down
So the new thing is "everyone I don't like is doing fraud" because they are racist to Somalis?
Here's hoping for a Blue State compact of commerce. California, New York, and Minnesota engaging in cooperative ventures. Maybe with a side of making treaties with Canada, Mexico, and the EU without federal oversight.
They know it’s the Viking Minnesotans not the Somali Minnesotans who get USDA funds, right?
They truly do not care at this point
I mean, all minnesotans will hurt from this, the poor especially
So all of this, a murder, the ice raids, now people going hungry can be traced back to a youtube video?
If by YouTube video, you mean the video of George Floyd being murdered by a cop, then yes. That situation was the beginning of the Trump-Walz vendetta. Then Timmy had to go and run for VP which really pissed Donny off. This whole situation is retribution.
Don’t forget, many people in Trump’s inner circle currently are from Minnesota (Hegseth) and the upper Midwest in general (Noem). Easy for Trump to hit ‘em where it hurts.
...George Floyd being murdered by a cop, then yes. That situation was the beginning of the Trump-Walz vendetta.
Trump literally praised Walz' use of the National Guard against BLM protesters after George Flloyd's murder. Here's KKKopmala bragging about it to show the feud was petty and started much sooner than Floyd's murder.
Pretty sure he's talking about that guy who went and tried to walk into a bunch of daycares then decided that since they wouldn't let some random creep in to film the kids they were all secret Somalian fraud rings.