this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
649 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

20247 readers
1216 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 130 points 4 months ago (2 children)

50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 85 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Or as I've recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I will never get sick of this ridiculous copypasta

[–] mech@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago

Found the Slackware user.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's exactly how I've always pronounced it, too.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Something I learned from QI

Stonehenge is not a true henge, as its ditch runs outside its bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The article ~~you keep linking~~ disagrees.

Although having given its name to the word henge, Stonehenge is atypical in that the ditch is outside the main earthwork bank.

An atypical example of something is still a "true" example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

Edit: Oops, mistook 2 basic pedants regurgitating trivia as the same person.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I keep linking..?

An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

I think the article is a bit confused in both defining the "henge" and saying if it is a henge or not. It sets a definition that Stonehenge doesn't follow, calls it "atypical", says it's not "true" henge (whatever that means) and so on. And all of those seem to be not directly sourced. One of the sources makes the confusion even worse:

Ironically, even though Stonehenge has an earthwork circle around it (the earliest phase of the monument), it isn’t officially a ‘proper’ henge, as the main ditch is external to the main bank. It has to make do with being a ‘proto-henge’.

I guess in this use it a "proper" ("true"?) henge is a henge and "proto-henge" is not a henge but a thing that precedes them. That'd explain some of the confusion. Could also be that "proto-henge" is counted as a form of a henge, but I'm not sure. Other examples seem to consider it preceding actual henges.

It would help if there was one definition for henge but there seems to be some that define it like in the article, with the ditch inside and others that just include a ditch.

especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

Terms can change over time, it could be the definiton of "henge" has changed.

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 80 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 43 points 4 months ago

Wtf is wrong with people

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

but they weren't destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they'd have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.

pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah, the "stick vs.1000 us marines" conundrum

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

look i know a sure bet when i see one, and someone said that about the lewis light machine gun and 20,000 emus. I'm betting on the stick.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 7 points 4 months ago

It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The druids designed Stonehenge in inches, but there was a mix-up and the contractor delivered the stones measured in feet.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.

Energy of this thread: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbyzgeee2mg

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 11 points 4 months ago

nearly indestructible

Yeah. Nearly. That's why some got replaced with concrete to keep up appearances.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 9 points 4 months ago
[–] Enzy@feddit.nu 9 points 4 months ago

Ah yes Rockhenge

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Basalt is pretty tough I hear

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

Barium salt? It's got electrolytes.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

alien druid-engineers, foreseeing british hooliganism: yeah, can't use sandstone here, folks. 👷‍♀️

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why is a political website posting about Stonehenge...

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

....uh, your link is just to a stupid image.

[–] Ravi@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

No it's cake!

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

So much less destructible than Strawhenge or Woodhenge.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz -1 points 4 months ago

Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it