this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
540 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5486 readers
345 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
540
How 'bout "No." (scontent.fyka1-1.fna.fbcdn.net)
submitted 1 month ago by Canconda@lemmy.ca to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Smart companies can use the opposite to their advantage: "No AI used in this product"-type of consumer badges. Doesn't cost a lick and smart customers will see the value in it.

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That almost inevitably will just be a new kind of greenwashing.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Made without AI! Would you like me to try some other slogans for you?"

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, in this insane, messed up world we live in...

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not yet! But I do see a time after the crash when saying "AI" will equate to "poison".

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

already happening for video games… Steam requests all publishers say whether AI was used or not and there are already many crying about the rule

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"How about no" until your employer turns "Weekly AI use" into a dumb ass KPI

[–] DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

My employer insisted we each provide a prompt for the prompt library. I used the AI to generate one for me to submit.

GIGO

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The company I work for, doing pest control, is using AI exclusively for training everyone. Even I as a higher level manager am subject to weekly AI bullshit training. We have a kpi now relating to our employees "scores" on this bullshit. I've pointed out multiple times that even when the test is taken again due to a failing grade or whatever, it doesn't actually change the score or anything. I was told to just manually change it. These guys raises are being dictated by this bullshit and most of the time the questions are ambiguous as fuck and the correct answer will score wrong. I hate it so much.

[–] Custard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Was in some training the other day and the instructor offhand mentioned he was required to work in a specific AI IDE for a certain number of hours a week.

Why do they do this

[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yep, it's not just the customer side that has to face this force-feeding, it's also being done internally. I'm not aware of AI usage being tracked in my company, but they're constantly encouraging us to use it and highlighting stories of people who have used it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How about "No"

Corporations are incapable of taking a "no". At best they'll give you a choice between 'yes' and 'later'.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So you're saying they don't respect consent.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. They don’t have to. They’re REWARDED for not taking consent. It’s how our entire system has been built over the last century or so.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And even when they ARE "punished", their profits far exceed the fine, which IS their only punishment.

If the punishment for a crime is just a fine, it's only a crime for the poor.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago

Yes. It’s infuriating.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah. Pretty much.

[–] jaredwhite@humansare.social 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a position of weakness. If their products were really "must have" in a way that everyone is simply clamoring for, they wouldn't need to be so thirsty. The Pick-me Corporation vibe is getting real, real tired.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Drugs never needed any marketing." - Doug Stanhope.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Drugs are so good we actively spend money to persuade people from using them.

Now that's a product worth investing in!

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago

If AI was at all close to paying for itself, we would see AI marketing for AI, and it would be good. Like, absolutely brilliant and make the companies all want to fire their meatbag marketing personnel. That's obviously nowhere near happening, and again, there's a reason for it.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It's worked well enough for most tech companies in the past. See Microsoft, Reddit, Meta, etc.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Followed by “look! You can make your cat look like anime!”

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It’s a middle-to-upper manager’s wet dream. Steal a bunch of other people’s work and use it to automatically build something plausible and take the credit.

Maintaining it is SEP (somebody else’s problem).

And if it kills someone, oppsie daisy.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Filled out a job app that basically said just that. Had to fake some text on how I would use AI. How the fuck would I know without taking the job?!

[–] jaredwhite@humansare.social 2 points 1 month ago

oof, sorry you had to deal with that 😑

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago