this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
218 points (98.2% liked)

PC Gaming

12821 readers
1006 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's going to be such a hack job with this takeover.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 5 points 2 hours ago

Man, they must really like soccer. I mean holy shit.

[–] Lazer365@feddit.nl 5 points 3 hours ago

I just figured out yesterday that you can ignore publishers on Steam, never again will I have to see an EA game in my recommendations.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

SA has a soon to be deady economy, because OIL doesnt last forever so they buy into whatever to keep thier country alive. SPORTSWASHIng , gamewashing.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I've been hearing it's running out for over 30 years. Is it actually almost gone now?

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

I don't think anybody really knows. My understanding is the problem is KSA reports unaudited reserve numbers, so you have to take them at their word. There's a lot of skepticism because they would report unchanged reserve numbers for years despite high exploitation. While they can certainly discover new reserves, it seems unlikely it would consistently be about equal to what they pumped out. I've read some analysts think they have less than half of what they report.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Just untrue. Saudi has massive deposits of rare earth metals, copper, gold. They’ll be fine.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

if that were true, they wouldnt be desperately buying properities, and IP all over the world in the western world to stave off thier decline, clearly they dont see the NAT resources as enough, you should check your sources.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 6 points 7 hours ago

You are presuming they are doing that to stave off economic decline, which is incorrect. They’re doing it for global prestige.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

people are buying EA games? Why tho?

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 3 points 2 hours ago

It’s a fucked up world.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Don't ever buy EA products again. No problem really.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I know at the very least 1 person who plays FIFA. I wouldn't say that I am friends with this person, quite the opposite. But he is a classmate of my friends so they are friends with him. Even they wonder why would he keep buying FIFA each year.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I wonder what they'll do with IPs like The Sims. I can't imagine they'll allow same-sex relationships, naturally, but I don't think they'll allow divorce, either. :S

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, other games will replace them. Like InZoi.

Same happened with Rollercoaster Tycoon (Planet Coaster), SimCity (Cities Skylines)

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, I have those games, but I want to know what direction they'll take. I want to know how bold they would be if they wanted to.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They might just sell the IP. I imagine they are mostly interested in the sports franchises.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

soccer, WWE, maybe UFC in the future is where all the money is at.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

I suspect that they'd be more hands off than you may expect (if they chose to keep that IP at all). The sovereign wealth fund is first and foremost interested in growing their investment value. And this has only been further cemented as MBS has continued to stripped wahabists of power to the point that they have almost no state involvement anymore.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Literally why would they give a shit? This only makes sense if you assume that they spent billions of dollars to export religious conservativism outside of Saudi Arabia. I dunno if you've noticed, but Saudi Arabia has been spending trillions of dollars to present a totally different, modern image to the world. The people spending the money don't actually give a shit about Allah. They only care what other people will submit to in Allah's name, and they know that's not going to fly outside their borders.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Saudi Arabia is a country with one of the strictest laws in the world. Why shouldn't anyone be suspicious of what they say or do? Why can't people have a healthy amount of distrust and skepticism of their actions if, as you said, they're trying to portray a different image of themselves to the world? Who says the mask can't come off under the right circumstances, like the shameless right-wing downturn of the US?

The Sims IP has always been one of the most welcoming and famous platforms for non-traditional values that directly contradict their country's principles. Because I don't know if you know, but homosexuality in Saudi Arabia is currently punishable by death. It's fair to imagine that some company-wide policy changes would take place when it's acquired to align with its own views, which also align with the Trump administration's crusade to eliminate liberal ideas. I mean, didn't they recently bribe him with a luxury jet? Don't you think they could have a broader joint interest at heart?

If franchises like Call of Duty have been targets of military marketing, it doesn't take much to imagine how a corporation from an authoritarian country like SA would at least attempt to rein in social values in The Sims if given the chance.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago)

Okay, but why? The hypothesis that they bought an extremely successful business because they want to make money doesn't need any further explanation. What is the motivation for them to try to export their strict laws to other countries? You act like it gives them so much personal joy at taking away our gay kissing, that's reason enough.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If it's over 51% it's all of it for all practical reasons.

[–] C8r9VwDUTeY3ZufQRYvq@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago

Agreed. I was already not buying EA games, so this doesn't change much at all.

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 26 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

Its shockingly sad how what EA was back in the early 90s to what it is now.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

early 2000s EA was also on the horse. It used to be that when you hear "EA Games, challenge everything" upon opening a game, you knew that you are up for a good time. By the end of 00s that would drastically change

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Disagree. They were more tolerable but very evil.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Not to mention prominently featuring transgender developers -- in the 80s!

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I remember when Skate 3 came out and people actually had positive opinions of EA and were excited about the games they made.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 5 points 11 hours ago

Dead Space too. They had a solid run in the late 2000s/early 2010s before doubling down on shit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 51 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

They might as well. I can't avoid buying EA games any harder than I already do.

[–] Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't bought an EA game since the SimCity 2013 reboot. They straight up lied about the nature of the game.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If EA, having been purchased, is milked for cash, strip-mined for IP, and then unceremoniously abandoned, it will be very funny.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'd rather have that than the IPs being used to promote and indoctrinate some religious bullshit.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 2 hours ago

Because religious bullshit makes the world a worse place.

While milking for cash and stripping the IP only makes the company worse.

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"So we're like, evil evil now" EA, probably.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 30 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Journalists are about to become a playable faction in battlefield

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

New vehicle available: Boeing 767

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Didn't play test well, gamers wanted a vehicle that didn't self destruct.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 35 points 22 hours ago

Or just part of the destructible environment.

load more comments
view more: next ›