this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
819 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26336 readers
2761 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] berno@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Dem leadership is ass. Rep leadership is ass.

We're cooked.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago

This enslaver state has been an ongoing disaster since its inception.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago

I think the Democratic leadership is now certain to follow the Whigs into the Home for Infinite Losers, alongside the Republicans too. That situation sounds VERY familiar. "They flip-flopped, then they caved."

The Whigs Collapse! | Why Slavery Killed the Age of Jackson

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 194 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And once again Bernie Sanders is fucking correct

Yes he hasn’t signed on wanting Schumer to be replaced.

Either has AOC.

That’s it IMO. That’s the death of it all right there.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really wish Bernie would enter the presidential as an independent. Not necessarily as the presidential pick but maybe as VP, given his age. Although if you see how the annoying orange has been doing recently I think Bernie could take over even in 4 years from now and be better.

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I fear that by doing that it would split the left vote. Resulting in more easy Republican victories.

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Calling democrats "the left" is a bit funny...

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

For the American Overton window. Of course they're more right wing when viewed in the light of European or even Canadian political sphere.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Or Asian sphere. Or South American sphere. Pretty much we're the crazies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm thinking that the US needs to go back to A/B testing. The "christians" in the midwest think social safety nets and "free handouts" should be illegal? They can get that. The countries who want them handouts, however, get them. And in 30 years we compare how's everyone doing.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The biggest problem with leaving it up to the states is that the party that is always harping on about states' rights is a bunch of disingenuous liars who immediately start restricting states' rights the second the state doesn't do what they want.

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

They refuse to fund disasters and social programmes in "blue" states while demanding it in theirs. Gloat about "voting to repeal Obama care" while taking credit for ACA (the same thing) in their home state (cause people like it)

It feels like there's basically no point in trying to make a deal with them

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

I’m thinking that the US needs to go back to A/B testing.

Like the Civil War?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago

The rich assholes in Washington do not care about us. They are set for life with the best Healthcare in the world. Why should they care about us?

Fuck the democrats. Fuck the Republicans more, but these democrats need to fucking go as well. They all need to go.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 90 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Bernie should have started 3rd party when they cheated him out of the presidential nomination. He played it safe and achieved nothing.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Third party won't work in a FPTP system.

We can pass RCV in local elections across the country, but progressive Dems need to work within the party lines to get shit done.

And he is a 3rd party: Democratic Socialist.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] theoneandonlyeggboi@lemmings.world 48 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Americans are too stupid to vote for a 3rd party and they're too stupid to implement any kind of ranked choice voting.

We all suffer because of our collective stupidity, and rich people continue to profit off of it.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh no, we aren't too stupid to implement ranked choice voting, we live in a country run by people who have a vested interest in not implementing it

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Por que no los dos?

MA lost the ballot initiative for ranked choice voting by lobbyists who made enough people believe it's too complicated.

Too complicated? Motherfucker you've been ranking favorite things longer than you've been shitting on a toilet.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

With all due respect. Because we probably agree on a lot of things. However, the "Americans are too stupid/lazy" take is the excuse used by stupid/lazy Americans to avoid making effort for change. It's a self fulfilling prophecy.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Tippy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Incredibly relevant discourse for the current US political environment

Apologies for reddit link, can't upload video directly in a comment on lemmy. The information this individual covers is absolutely vital for understanding modern politics in the US, and needs to be common knowledge if the US is ever going to recover from the exploitation that has led us here.

Most on lemmy will already be aware of the basics covered here, but for anyone confused as to why dems always choose failure in the most frustrating ways, this will explain it for you. This is why we need to support actual progressives who refuse to be bought and paid for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Can someone explain to me simply (and I'm assuming the answer to that is "no"), why they can't force the insurance companies to compete with each other on price. That would seem to be the obvious "free market republican" thing to do, and a prerequisite for removing the fat subsidy to the insurance companies that they're currently trying to remove.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Because as usual, it's a crime against humanity to pay gamblers to rob us of our healthcare.

This is ancient news that will never accepted in the phony capitalist/hegemonic narrative of "insurance" and "markets".

https://web.stanford.edu/~jay/health_class/Readings/Lecture01/arrow.pdf

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because insurance doesn’t work like a normal product or good.

What ends up happening is they charge as much as they possibly can. The book “an American sickness” explains all the problems if you’re interested.

The ACA was never going to be great. It was the best that could get passed.

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It wasn't the best that could get passed. The Dems had a super majority during Obama's 1st two years and could have gotten us Medicare for all, but Rahm Emmanuel blocked it.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›