this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
555 points (83.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35517 readers
3299 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 191 points 1 week ago (19 children)

That's because hormonal birth control for women takes advantage of existing biological processes to prevent pregnancy.

Men don't have any known biological processes that can be utilized like that, although it's been consistently studied for decades.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And there is some progress too afaik

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 50 points 1 week ago (6 children)

There's been "progress" every few years for decades. Male birth control is basically the medical equivalent of battery technology.

I'll believe it when a pill makes it to market.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Just like cold fusion

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I had thought that another part of it was the levels of harm compared to the problem; getting pregnant is incredibly stressful and possibly harmful, up to and including death as a possibility. A medicine that can stop that but has side affects that are less harmful than pregnancy is a lot more palatable. Whereas, for men, the harm caused by pregnancy is zero, so any harm caused by the pill is weighed a lot heavier.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's really frustrating how often this gets framed as sexist, when it's a totally different problem. I get why people would equate them but they are very different biological processes. Producing a baby is a complicated process, and there's a lot of steps that we can intervene in to prevent it. Producing a million sperm is, maybe surprisingly, less complicated and it's harder to target a specific thing and produce easily reversible results.

Men have had vasectomy on the table for a long time now. It's just more serious than most forms of female birth control, in terms of implementation and recovery, still not foolproof, and not as easy to reverse.

Even more frustrating is that sexism definitely does exist and play a role. It's just more about the human parts of the process, like dealing with medical staff, dealing with insurance, dealing with local, state, and now federal governments that want to bar access to women. Looking at the pill side is misplacing the anger.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Weird how it seems like it's all for women and safe sex but then criticizes a tool women have to checks notes take control of their sex lives and make decisions about getting pregnant.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 58 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I not sure I can impregnate 9 women in a day but I'm willing to participate in a scientific study to find out if anyone is doing that.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

starts doing warmup stretches

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How does this unscientific instagram vomit has 500 votes on lemmy? Are we turning into reddit?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 week ago (13 children)

I'm not sure who's she targeting because I know a lot of guys who would love to have birth control pills.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It ain't like pharma ain't been trying to make male birth control pills. Lord knows they'd love the extra money.

But it turns out to be damn difficult to get right.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Not everything is a conspiracy against women

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 41 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Dumb. It's a lot easier to stop one egg a month, than zillions of sperm multiple times a day. Simple as that.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 19 points 1 week ago

Not only that, there's an interruptible cycle of egg release. There's no regular interruptible cycle in men.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 41 points 1 week ago (12 children)

This is just logically wrong.

If birth control was only made for men, and 90% of men were on birth control, you could end up with far more pregnancies than if it's for women and 90% of women were on it.

The conclusion is exactly the opposite of the argument.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Those 9 men could prevent women getting pregnant by cumming in me instead.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's the woman who'd get pregnant and who doesn't want to. Should she rely on whether the men took their pills correctly? Taking hormones sucks for many women, but they're happy to be able to have birth control in their hands.

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Yeah, I think people forget why the pill was such a game changer: It allowed women, without the permission or knowledge of their husband/sexual partner, to decide whether or not they wanted to get pregnant.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The most commonly produced, available, and used birth control method worldwide is the latex condom, used by everyone who has a penis. Try again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TommyJohnsFishSpot@lemy.lol 33 points 1 week ago (8 children)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 47 points 1 week ago

Nowhere does it say you have to limit yourself to that

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the numbers were correct and your aim was to reduce pregnancies, you could prevent 90% of pregnancies by getting roughly 90% of sexually active women to take the pill. Getting 99.95% of sexually active men to take the pill would have NO effect whatsoever on the pregnancy rate, because the remaining 1 in 2000 men would continue to meet and impregnate a woman roughly once every hour for roughly 12 hours a day (with breaks for food and resting his dick a tiny bit) for 9 months straight, with time to visit 430 women a second time in case these miracle impregnators somehow didn't always impregnate on first meeting a woman. (This would very drastically reduce diversity in the gene pool and the world would be very very very badly interbred within two generations.)

But of course humans don't behave like the numbers suggest AT ALL, thank goodness.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, this isn't a great point at all.... even at face value really.

Put slightly differently, if we're assuming people sleep around as much as the text implies, if we focus on birth control solely for men, then one 'failure'/non-controlled man would result in a ton of pregnancies. If the onus is on women, then one 'failure'/non-controlled woman would result in one pregnancy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Counterpoint: a woman taking birthcontrol is empowered because she is taking charge of her own reproduction. She doesn't have to rely on or trust the man to take his pill. After all, she would be the one bearing most of the burden in case of an unwanted pregnancy.

Additionally, purely biologically it is much easier to reliably stop conception on the female side than on the male side. A woman only produces one egg cell per month, whereas a man produces millions of sperm cells per day.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The Lemmycels are pretty angry at this one, but on the other hand it's pretty silly to trust dudes with birth control when you're the one that gets pregnant.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] zout@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A man's got to eat some time you know.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

I think if I busted a nut 9 times a day, I would just simply just vanish.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got snipped so my wife didn't have to do the hormonal bullshit. Her doctor is putting her back in it because women's bodies literally do not want them to be happy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (8 children)

9!? You think I can cum 9 times a day!? And apparently hit the egg every fucking time too? I don't mean to question the conclusion because I think birth control should be both parties' responsibility, but I think your premise reveals a distinct lack of grasp on biological reality. Why stop at 9? Why not 900? Really drive your point home! My dick is going to be useless after number 2 or 3 anyway.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

So in this imaginary never ending orgy it would still make sense for the women to take the pill because if 99% of the men do the other 1% will somehow make every single women pregnant.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone tell her condoms exist and it's men's job to buy and wear them. Prevention is both genders responsibility. If they make a pill for men I'll happily take it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's easier to prevent ovulation of one egg than stop a billion sperm cells from reaching their destination. Stop politicising biology.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Genghis Khan has entered the chat

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago

You still need it.

When you see a driver running a red light, you still brake even if your light is green.

[–] KenOh@feddit.online 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tabooki@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (19 children)

It's not like they haven't tried. Most men would love to be able to ensure they don't get snared. 😉

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just FYI after the 5th one I'm just cumming air at that point, but if there are 2,430 women out there who want to give it a try anyway be my guest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All I'm seeing is I can seed my own country if I try hard enough.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago

The one who gets pregnant should probably take the birth control, as pregnancy would be more bothersome for them than for the other person.

load more comments
view more: next ›