this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
317 points (94.9% liked)

RPGMemes

14125 readers
800 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 146 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 week ago
[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried that. The paladin Divine Smite'd me :(

Secular Smite them back, easy.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Turns out we were in a JRPG the whole time

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

Reach heaven through violence

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

The king is a puppet of a dictatorial clergy, the solution is to burn the church down with the clergy and monarchy inside.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It seems like any sufficiently rich person, like a monarch, could essentially have someone on staff - maybe multiple people - whose entire job is to periodically cast True Resurrection, naming the rich individual. If they aren't dead, the spell fails; if they are, they come back to life, and can name their assassin.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay.

True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.

Or stuff it in a bag of holding!

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I guess this comes down to DM fiat as for what constitutes "touching" the creature. For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, which they were also taking any of those steps to prevent decay of?

The 3rd Edition version of the spell is even more ambiguous. RAW, it doesn't prevent you from "unambiguously identifying" the creature through a means other than touching the body even if the body still exists.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body,

RAW and RAI that wouldn't work, otherwise you could cast Inflict Wounds on someone by merely having a strand of hair from them. The RAW answer would be to have someone cast Contingency + Gentle Repose, though at that point you may as well add in a teleport or something instead

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There definitely should be some spells that work like that tbh, it's a classical trope of curse magic.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That wouldn't be a feature of the spell but of the caster

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once those items are removed from the body they become a separate object. Maybe useful in divination, but not touching the body. If this were true the party could just cut off some hair hand it to the cleric and all their touch spells would be infinite range.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, so, thought experiment. Someone gets cut into a lot of pieces. What do you have to touch to resurrect them? The largest piece? Any piece? No piece, the body is destroyed? What constitutes 'destroyed'? If getting cut into pieces counts, then how much of the body has to be missing?

RAW doesn't really adequately address this situation.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My comment was about the plan for gentle repose, but if you're talking about the resurrection spell it does have text that overcomes this problem, because it regenerates any lost limbs.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but... which piece gets regenerated? The one you touch?

In that case, why couldn't the spell be cast on the severed finger to regenerate an entire body attached to it?

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can. My problem was using gentle repose on a severed finger. Looking back it seems like that might not be what you were suggesting. If so my mistake.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah, sorry, I think there's two different competing discussions happening in this same thread. I'm also getting confused about what's being discussed. :D

I was proposing (for example) embalming a finger to prevent decay and having a permanent True Resurrection 'target', not using Gentle Repose specifically, but I can see where the ambiguity came from.

Magic doesn't make any sense. lol

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Or they could just have some Clones.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 25 points 1 week ago

"~~Nanomachines~~ Invulnerability, son."

[–] hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they are referring to the No Kings protest going on in the US right now.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/us/politics/no-kings-protests-trump.html

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ahh I see, I thought there'd been some kind of new attempt on somebody's life 😂 Living under a rock these days, sorry!

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

To be fair, I'm not american, and the first thing I thought was "has there been another attempt at Trump's life?" lol

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

Nepotism, son. It hardens in response to the lowborn existing within 20ft of my person.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago

NANOBLESSINGS, SON!

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This really gets into the foundational expectations of the setting.

In a reality structured to allow for Heroes, a leader must be one, or else be replaced by the next one to stroll through.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hero might be the wrong word except in the traditional sense of demigod. There's an implicit positive moral judgement in the term that being a monarch has very little to do with.

I'd also argue that it's more that monarchy by its own self justification is based on the idea that the king protects, and therefore effectively owns, his subjects. A king might do that by effective governance however. If they can't do it personally they'd need the loyalty of a champion, for example.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody would rule by birthright in a D&D world. Any leader of a country would have access to Clone, and would have no need for inheritance.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny thing, there was a 2e setting called Birthright, which pretty much made the game about developing land as a lord, rather than dungeon delving

[–] VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh. I just learned about this. I have no involvement in this channel but this video was neat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsGk9M-4dq4

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought this was going to be spam. I recommend saying what you're posting a link to. Or at least something that makes it clear you're replying to a specific comment instead of posting that at random.

[–] VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I responded to his comment about the Birthright setting with a video on the Birthright setting. I suppose I could have been more clear, but I definitely did respond to someone and did not post at random.

Funny thing, there was a 2e setting called Birthright, which pretty much made the game about developing land as a lord, rather than dungeon delving

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know. It's just that I only know because I clicked the link.

[–] VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Fair enough. I will keep it in mind. :)

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

If this king doesn't have access to wizards casting every defensive spell in the player's handbook on him every single day of his life, wearing the best magical armor in the world that glamors into ordinary royal attire, with defensive wards cast around his immediate vicinity every day, and he just let adventurers stroll into his castle armed while he was being lax with all these precautions, then he deserves to get Kirked.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bravo on that headline OP! ;)

[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck in

[–] Noctis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Lord British be like