Archpawn

joined 2 years ago
[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I see no reason it wouldn't. It's not casting or concentrating on a spell. My question: does it take the damage instead before or after your damage resistance is applied?

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

My point is that since it's not using specific D&D terminology, it should just be taken to mean literally any spell targeting only you. Which Dragon's Breath is, so long as you cast it on yourself.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

While mounted on it, you can make any spell you cast that targets only you also target the mount.

It doesn't say "targets self". It says "targets only you".

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's already a celestial, a fey, or a fiend rhino. Given that, having wings isn't surprising.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

That sounds entirely reasonable. Why the meme?

Edit: Does "targets you only" mean it has to have a target of self, or just that in this casting it is only targeting you? I'm thinking cast Dragon's Breath on yourself and share it with your steed, and now both of you get a breath weapon.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're talking about verbal and somatic components. That spell doesn't have material components.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Sending doesn't have a range limit, and explicitly works across planes 95% of the time.

The big question here is what mechanically is them. Spells like Revivify target a dead creature, which means if the corpse isn't the creature the spell won't work. But there's also no rule that dead creatures can't talk or take actions or whatever, so you'd still be able to use Sending or just ask them normally. But that's assuming they are a creature. The section on improvised weapons says that a dead goblin is an Object. If dying turns a Creature into an Object, then it could no longer take actions. But there's also nothing saying that Creature and Object are mutually exclusive. maybe a corpse is both?

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

He asked someone to raise him up.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

2013 was in 1988. 2020 was in 1990

Imagine this with no context.

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Isn't this just Mutants?

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's the bottomless pit supervisor meme, but beyond that I'm stumped.

 

Right now, the only method I found is to click on the expando, then right click on the image and open it in a new tab. Is there a way to make it so I can just click it once? I can't imagine any possible scenario where I'd want to see a large but not full size image.

I'm using the browser on my computer if that's relevant.

Edit: I got it to work using the Stylus addon and:

.img-expanded:not(.banner, .avatar-overlay) {
    max-height: unset;
    max-width: 100vw;
    position: absolute;
    left: 50%;
    transform: translateX(-50%);
    outline: auto;
    outline-color: black;
    z-index: 1;
}

I also made it outline any expandos with:

/*Note: Links are exactly the same except without bg-transparent, so using not(bg-transparent) instead will outline the links instead of the expandos. Also, they're outlined orange unless you change it, so you could take that off, give them all outlines, and you can tell which they are based on the color.*/
.thumbnail.rounded.overflow-hidden.d-inline-block.position-relative.p-0.border-0.bg-transparent {
    outline: auto;
}
view more: next ›