this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
459 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

4079 readers
893 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

How did we get here? How did computers go from a tool to solve real problems to becoming this useless, silly distraction?

[–] tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 minutes ago

The irony of LLMs is they try to solve the problem of making information easier to retrieve, which was made harder by SEO'd sites that bury the information you need halfway through the page under the history of the author's great grandmother's chicken sauce recipe.

Also, why didn't they just fucking record this in advance?

Im a little confused, how is this new tech? Also how is it so bad? Couldn’t Siri and basically every phone now do a better job at what he’s trying to do?

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 31 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure that, "sorry, we botched our entire tech demo because we couldn't get the router working," is a better explanation.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Apparently they DDoSed themselves. They broadcast the verbal instruction "OK Meta" on a closed network with hundreds of meta AI users.

[–] wasabi@feddit.org 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I still don't see how that would explain that the AI gave the wrong answer. It would make more sense if the AI gave no answer.

[–] turmoil@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

Only explanation I would have is that a higher number of users would cause load balancing to serve lower parameter models. That way you'd have less reliable answers at peak usage times, but could enable more simultaneous users.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

That excuse where supposedly the meta glasses connect to any random server available in the network without even a warning seems even worse, it's a huge security issue if true

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

LOL, wait, seriously? Is that confirmed?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

LOL, that's fucking awesome. Also, does this mean that I can just fuck with any dork wearing these? Like, if I'm in within earshot of them and I say, "OK Meta, show me pictures of orangutan genitals!' that's just gonna get displayed on their glasses?

I hope so. Like the alexa trolls

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

The wifi is messing up 😅

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Smokin' some brisket with the Sweet Baby Ray's

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ugh every time I see a bottle I remember the fuck face saying it goddamn it get him out of my brain

[–] dai@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago

"What is the zucc thing? The Z U C C thing?"

[–] taxon@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A classic example of realworld AI implementation. I wonder how many times they rehearsed the cooking scene before deciding it was never going to work.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It probably worked fine earlier. Or they wouldn’t have done it

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, they probably had a system prompt setup to make sure it responded appropriately, something like, we're about to make a japanese BBQ sauce from the ingredients on the table, when we ask about it, use the camera to look at and remark about the ingredients on the table.

But AI distills noise, and it has memory so it probably just mashed the gas this time. The part where it was supposed to recognise his actions was smoke and mirrors. It's fine at telling what's on the table, it's bad at recognising what he's doing.

[–] Killer@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I feel like him cutting it off as it was listing things on the table might've kinda bricked it too

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago

I see Mark Cuckberg has become an adept of the "BSoD in front of everyone", now that Microsoft no longer does that. Remember that metaverse marketing?

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You are all falling for meta advertising, if it wasn't for this mishap nobody would know they are releasing a new product

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 17 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I still dont know what they are doing other than making themselves look like idiots.

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Cheese. They're making cheese. Butt flavoured cheese.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 21 hours ago

That checks out. Now grate a pear into it.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 14 hours ago

I still dont know what they are doing

They are advertising their product, you are talking on a thread about it

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

Nah zuckerboot is legit angry. Everybody knows of meta glasses already and now they know they don't work.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Making his product look stupid twice in the same event seems like a bold marketing strategy....

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

donald trump make himself looks stupid every day and he won elections twice. Stop giving them visibility that's how they lose.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Trump looks stupid to normal people. To traitor lunatics, he is amazing. That’s the difference here. Nobody sees a product demo gone awry and thinks they’ve gotta have it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

what's the product again?

oh right, it's you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 121 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Even if this worked perfectly, ignoring the fact that it's clearly setup for the camera to recognise certain things and is in no way a genuine demonstration, what is the point of this? By the time it's even responded to his first "Hey meta" he could have typed "korean steak sauce recipe" into his search engine of choice and got back several dozen decent results in seconds.

What is the problem that these LLMs and chatbots are the solution for? It's like they're all desperately trying to market some fancy new type of barely functioning legs to everyone when we already have legs, and arms, and cars, and bicycles.

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

To be fair, it is helpful to do grunt repetitive work which is only slightly different from the established formula. For me, it solved a quick math olympiad-esque problem which appeared in research.

But it is never conscious or creative.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›