316
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The US Food and Drug Administration has proposed revoking its regulation authorizing the nationwide use of brominated vegetable oil, or BVO, as an additive in food.

The FDA’s decision comes after California banned the ingredient in October by passing the California Food Safety Act, the first state law in the United States to ban brominated vegetable oil. The additive is already banned in Europe and Japan.

“The agency concluded that the intended use of BVO in food is no longer considered safe after the results of studies conducted in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health … found the potential for adverse health effects in humans,” said James Jones, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods, in a statement.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 86 points 1 year ago

Alternative title: FDA proposes finally catching up with Europe on food safety

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Let's not get ahead of ourselves

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

The FDA is maybe thinking about possibly becoming interested in catching up to EU food standards.

Fixed.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

In one of thousands of positions.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

For anyone else curious, it was in there as an emulsifier, particularly for citrus flavor oils.

These days it's mainly found in generic branded products, such as Walmart's Mountain Lightning. Mountain Dew is one of the more recent big brand names to remove it, back in 2020.

Interesting case from the Wikipedia:

There are case reports of adverse effects associated with excessive consumption of BVO-containing products. One case reported that a man who consumed two to four liters of a soda containing BVO on a daily basis experienced memory loss, tremors, fatigue, loss of muscle coordination, headache, and ptosis of the right eyelid, as well as elevated serum chloride. In the two months it took to correctly diagnose the problem, the patient also lost the ability to walk. Eventually, bromism was diagnosed and hemodialysis was prescribed which resulted in a reversal of the disorder.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That case sounds crazy... I am not the healthiest of people, but who can drink 2 or more liters a day every day? Sucks that it happened, but I guess it is good that we found all these terrible things it does as well? I just wonder how it affects people in moderation. Does it really do anything in low doses over long periods of time, or would it be harmless? Of course, why even find out if it can just not be used...

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

When I still drank pop regularly, my rate of buying it was 2 12 packs of cans every other day, so a 12 pack of 355ml per day, or about 3.8L. I'd just have them by my desk and when one ran out, I'd grab one of the other flavour and just alternate all day. I'm not really sure how I didn't end up diabetic or obese because pop was my main drink when I wasn't getting drunk for almost a decade after leaving home and being in charge of my own habits. I kept that 3.8L peak going for a couple of years until information about HFCS and then sugar in general started my journey from pop to juice then to mostly just water.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like our one friend a while back. He was super skinny and didn't drink alcohol but he would bring a 12 pack of Pepsi with him and would call them blue bullets. We had no idea how he survived, years later he even got an ok report from the doctor which we all thought was crazy including himself. He has stopped in recent years, thankfully, and knew even though nothing happened yet something bad was definitely going to sooner or later.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's a form of self-medication. More than likely these people need a diagnosis of who-knows-what.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It was in Gatorade and other sports drinks for a long time, and athletes probably drink more of that while also pushing their bodies to more extremes than the rest of us, and I didn't see any evidence of harm going on there when I was looking up what BVO was.

The body is really great at removing both things, but with any substance, too much can exceed an organ's capacity to desk with it. Even water is deadly (very painfully, too) if you drink too much too fast. Your cells will burst from osmsosis. Brain cells are especially susceptible. It's called hyponatremia.

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Probably cause real athletes don't drink Gatorade. Too much sugar and not enough potassium. Electrolyte beverages and coconut water are more common among athletes.

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The people who are drinking 2+ liters a day aren't drinking any water. Soda is literally the only form of hydration they get. I know it sounds unbelievable but I used to know people who lived like this. Personally I wouldn't last a day before my body starts demanding water. I don't know how they do it.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And that's why you don't eat or drink huge amounts of any one thing. Sounds like smaller amounts, even daily, would be perfectly tolerable by most people.

There's a guy who drank up to 4L of Earl Grey tea every day until he developed muscle and eye problems. Or the guy who ate a bag of black licorice every day until he had a heart attack and died.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Most things we can handle from time to time. It’s constant exposure that tends to make most things problematic.

[-] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago

Clearly companies have been able to make the sodas just fine without it, so even if it isn't very harmful, it seems best not to include it. Food additives are like software bloat, the more you have, the more attack surface (in this case, possibility albeit small chance of undiscovered health problems) you get, so one should only use what actually is useful

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Good. Ban dyes, too. IDGAF if my cola is brown. IDGAF if my mountain dew is the color of radioactive piss.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Coke should be in the clear it should be using caramel colour. For green there's chlorophyll copper complexes, for yellow tumeric. No it won't look radioactive but who the fuck cares.

...it's not like food producers aren't using colouring in the EU, it's that they're going "oh here is what we have, let's see what we can do with that" and not "here's a colour chart, marketing wants it to look like this, make it work with ridiculous amounts of chemistry that's never been tested on animals much less humans who cares where the chips fall they won't fall this financial quarter".

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not concerned for health. It's unnecessary. It is added to give the drinks a color. Just cut it out, even if it costs almost nothing.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's not really unnecessary, colour plays a role in aroma perception. Cherry drops don't taste like cherry when they're green instead of red. They still taste fruity, sure, but unless you're highly trained and experienced you won't be able to pick out the aroma.

And stuff like e.g. lemon doesn't have enough colour on its own to provide that kind of stimulus. So you get some turmeric with your lemon juice and zest in your lemon drops and what's wrong with that.

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm just saying let things be whatever color they are.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

"I don't care that there's nothing wrong with it I just don't like it."

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

How dare you restate my comment exactly as I intend it. I just don't like it.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

We will have a grade school children uprising when all their candy stops being bright orange, green, and blue.

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The most valid argument against my position, right here.

[-] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Are we just glossing over the job title, "Deputy Commissioner of Human Foods"?

[-] June@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Seems reasonable. I imagine foods for human consumption and animal consumption require different specialties.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hmm, Human Foods... I like it!

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Kind of a badass title for weird titles.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

But isnt that what plants crave?

[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Looks like it's back to drinking out of the toilet for me

[-] Chreutz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Found in"...? I think you mean "put into".

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For fucks sake

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Mountain dew has brominated vegetable oil in it in case u were wondering what products.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 18 points 1 year ago

Only if you're drinking a old bottle. It hasn't been an ingredient for years.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Just checked the label, and you are correct. There is no BVO in Mt Dew.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There's another comment that says it was done in 2020.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
316 points (99.4% liked)

News

23305 readers
3638 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS