I find this hilarious because you keep raging about people calling someone fascist for not sharing the exact same opinion, yet that's exactly what you're doing, accusing me of being something I'm not because you won't take the time to understand what I'm saying.
Then I think instead of saying "This type of people do this bad thing", maybe phrase it as "doing this goes against the values of the people you claim to be a part of".
That's not at all what I am saying. I think you may have become the thing you are raging against.
That's not anarchy, that's being an asshole. You are generalizing an entire group based on the actions of one person.
The only time people complain about rules is when they have broken them or intend to break them.
They seem upset for not being able to harass people for some reason, I'm just curious which form of harassment they feel is justified.
Oh. That's not anarchy, that's somebody being an asshole.
But even in this context, who were you degrading and why?
I just copied from the link you shared. 🤷🏻♂️
Which of these best describes your opinion that the Anarchists disapprove of?:
Sexism,
Racism,
White Supremacy (or any ethnic-supremacy),
Homophobia (or any sexuality-phobia),
Fascism,
Genocide,
Drug-phobia,
Ethnic-, gender-, sexuality-, ableist-, etc., based slurs,
Oath-taking or pledge-taking.
One thirty secondth
I think every individual has at least a few of these in their head.
You're right. I suppose I should have said, you don't complain about rules that you agree with. But generally, when someone's on here complaining about being silenced and specifically quotes "People should not be harassed for these reasons:" I'd bet it was because they harassed somebody for one of those reasons and they feel that they should be able to do that.