this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
602 points (99.3% liked)

politics

25456 readers
1508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new psychological study has found that people who report favorable views of Donald Trump also tend to score higher on measures of callousness, manipulation, and other malevolent traits—and lower on empathy and compassion. The findings, based on two large surveys of U.S. adults, shed light on how personality traits relate to political beliefs, including support for Trump and conservative ideology. The research was recently published in the Journal of Research in Personality.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] havocpants@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Seems like a lot of words to say that they're assholes.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

If the psychologist would have studied the Bolsheviks, Mao's CCP members, and the European fascists, they would have the same result. Basically low-life shitbags.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

Huh, I wouldn't expect a narcissist to like another narcissist

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 118 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uneducated, child-level emotions, an inability to discuss political viewpoints, and actual anger when criticizing their cult leader, who could have seen that coming.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Well, you've got to be mental to support Trump. So this was to be expected.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 76 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pope reports high levels of Catholicism

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From a catholic standpoint, the last 2 popes were pretty progressive tho.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah. They were great about condemning child abuse while still making sure to protect the rapists.

A "progressive pope" is like a "good republican": They don't fucking exist

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Well, it is a spectrum.

While I don't love the idea of having a Romney in the White House....I'd take it over Taco. I'm not sure that makes Romney "good", but it definitely would be a lot less bad than conservatism unchained like it is under Taco.

I don't pay too much attention to popes because, well, I just don't give a fuck and religion has zero authority over me in a secular nation. But I do realize it's a spectrum there, too, and if they elect someone who has more modern views on things - I guess that's good for the people that look to popes for what to think and do?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krull_krull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Things like this always grind my gears.

because there are good Republican, for example: Irish Republican, Spanish Republican, Pro independence Republican, etc

I think what you mean is "there are no good trump suporter"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jayve@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

This just in! NO SHIT.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

/s not necessary, the meme already implied sarcasm

[–] plyth@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What are the numbers? If it is 3% for Trumpers and 2.5% for everybody else, is that worth talking about?

If however 50% of Trumpers are psychopaths, what could be done? Feeling morally superior doesn't seem to be enough.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

It's working out OK over here. No interactions with known magas (or any conservative for that matter) that aren't obligated by work or family.

I'm about five years into that philosophy and really, yeah, I'm feeling loads better.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In other news, water is wet. I can only think how fortunate that one person must be who has no maga in their life, and had to read this study to learn this.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Indeed. I wish all the conservatives in my life could somehow have the fever break. I honestly think if some intervention was done, especially in their media diet[1], AND they got some form of therapy, whether it was also pharmaceutical or not, I seriously think at least half of them could be weaned off of conservatism.

Sadly, there is likely no way that intervention is going to be done at scale. Sometimes spouses or family do it, but I think it's quite rare. Whole lot of men have zero friends and very little family in their lives, I think and Faux and hate radio is always going to be a flick away for people that don't have real people in their lives. And the con elite know this. It's often why this stuff is pushed out there at a loss, even if it loses money for years, like Faux.

[1] I remember reading recently that even having to have moderate weekly/daily amounts of something like CNN (lol), IIRC, would tend to moderate their views.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

In other words MAGA would be very upset at this if they could read.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

So conservatives.

[–] jukmehrk@lemmy.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Comical. Psypost also published this last week:

"New psychology research finds leftist causes widely seen as more moral — even by conservatives"

https://www.psypost.org/new-psychology-research-finds-leftist-causes-widely-seen-as-more-moral-even-by-conservatives/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Of course.

Even amidst the overt efforts to eatablish an authoritarian police state, this administration is most notable for being petty, vindictive and wantonly destructive. It's as if even instituting neo-feudalistic/fascistic/plutocratic oligarchy is a secondary goal, and the primary goal is simply to be cruel, selfish, petulant and mean.

So of course those are the qualities one will find in its supporters. Most of them don't even have a coherent ideology - all they have is hate and a petty and childish desire to make those they hate suffer.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seriously. Next time, ask one of them that repeats "maga!" without any sense of irony what that even means. I've done this for at least one of my in-laws in Taco's first term.

I tried to ask what "great" is supposed to mean. What is Taco going to do for his policy? I also asked when it was last "great" and when did it stop being "great"? I didn't try to "debate" him, I was just asking more clarifying questions about his statements.

Seriously, they find this truly baffling, by the way. They expect either: people will get mad and react to them (thus, "liberal: owned"), or to give a thumbs-up and yes-and them with all the latest hate radio/Faux talking points, or what most people do, which is to try to change the topic or wander to another room, etc. Asking more questions about their claims is just not something that happens in most cases, I think.

About the only specifics on any kind of policy seemed to involve punching down on others. Getting women in line, showing people with degrees that Taco is actually smarter than all of them, othering any non-xtians, most especially Muslims and atheists, "closing the border" (wtf?), an obsession with trans and gays and what they are seemingly "getting away with", Blacks being put in their place because too many quotas, and so on.

When I asked how their life would be any better....it was even less coherent. I couldn't really get anything out of them. It was all about these stupid petty phantom grievances about what other people - mostly in big cities they don't even live near - were up to, and about reining them in.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The one that kills me - my brother does this - is framing it as a response to imaginary opponents.

He does these monologues about the libs or the woke mob or the city people or whoever in which he first mimics what they're supposedly saying, then responds to it with some copy and paste bit of MAGA dogma.

He doesn't even engage with actual people - it's just the strawmen in his head.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes when I'm talking to someone I know like this, I have to refrain from being snarky and saying something like "show me on the doll where Obama hurt you".

But in all seriousness, I do tend to ask lots of questions of these people. I think some of them think I'm just doing trolling IRL, because they seem to legit be taken aback. They are used to people taking one of three paths (push-back from the now-owned liberal, emphatic agreement that maybe comes just shy of high-fives and a chest-bump, and others trying to ignore/shun such people), and I take a fourth. Maybe there is just a bit of a trolling element, but honestly, I'm morbidly curious.

Asking things like who are they talking about and where did they see this kind of thing when they are doing the strawman thing. And how were you harmed by Clinton's policies, or Obama's or Biden's. And which specific policies? Also, which specific policies of Taco's have improved the economy and/or their lives in quantifiable ways?

I don't know if this causes any stir of thought in them at all, but often, I find that they don't have answers for any of this. I'm able to keep a cool head and ask questions in a calm and indoor voice and not react in the predictable ways that they think a liberal will act, and that's really key - because they do tend to get emotional in the process and sometimes, the person they are talking to not getting emotional can make them even more angry, at least in the moment.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Huh.... I should try that.

My standard response is to just leave the room.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All republicans are cunts.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

hey now, I've had only positive experiences with cunts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No shit.... Trying to destroy a country because their feelings say the imaginary sky wizard will save themselves and everybody who isn't as cracker ass cracker white is wrong... Will lead people to believe they are narcissistic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

In a similar story, science has discovered that the sky is in fact- made of air.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

They definitely have less empathy.

If they had anywhere close to the amount that the left has, they would never have voted for this orange moron.

You know... deplorables.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

This should surprise no one who actually interacts with any of his more fervent supporters, that's for sure.

When the conservatives say that "liberalism is a mental disorder", it's once again projection. It's always projection with conservatives.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some people tell me "you just sit these guys down and convince them out of their positions, trust me, it will work"

And then I read this stuff over and over and over again. Write these idiots off for christ sake. Gerrymander them away, shut off fox news, ban their dumb content creators from the internet and lock up every ICE agent in the country forever.

Whatever it takes, make them politcally irrelevant, then you can think about improving something.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I honestly do think quite a bit of it is constant saturation of hate radio and Faux News, combined with loneliness and/or undiagnosed mental disorders.

People are alone in their cars quite a bit and I don't know if you've driven through certain parts of the country, but if you don't have podcasts/satellite radio in your car, there is almost nothing but country music or hate radio in some parts of it. The con elite knew what they were doing when they funded all this stuff, often at a loss.

I bet more than half of the people deep in the conservative cult could be deprogrammed, but I just don't see anything like that happening at scale. And it would be way too easy for them to slip back into old ways, since it's like junk food in a food desert - it's ever-present and easily accessible nearly everywhere, and there is virtually nothing healthy offered to counter that terrible diet, whether it's a food diet or a media diet.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

I think most of these people are just unhappy with their lives and blame others for it

[–] Balaquina@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To the surprise of absolutely no one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That is liberal propaganda lies. I will now dox you so a frantic MAGA crowd can come and kill you.
/s (just in case)

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am watching the latest episode of Historia Civilis, and a obituary for King Geroge IV was quoted: "The character of which, rose little higher than animal indulgence."

Sounds like an apt descriptor of Trump and everyone within his orbit.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

is that uhh.. is that image ai slop? not blaming op but it seems.. shiny?

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

magas kind of look like ai slop to begin with

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

It sort of does have that look, doesn't it.

load more comments (1 replies)

https://files.catbox.moe/9xgjr0.jpeg

Our sources say that water is wet.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

given the amount of "but I didn't think it was bad until it happened to me" with deportations and medicaid cuts, not surprised.

load more comments
view more: next ›