this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
1194 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

16487 readers
3960 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 185 points 1 week ago (11 children)

When Newton worked out the laws of motion, he figured they had to be correct because they were so simple and elegant.

He had no idea that relativity was going to come in and fuck his shit up.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (7 children)

And then there was quantum.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 88 points 1 week ago

Do you have any idea how fast you were going?

No officer, but I can tell you exactly where I am!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ragingHungryPanda@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He did also notice that the planets didn't move quite exactly as he predicted and said "well, God must keep them in place"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TBF the laws of motion are still correct.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 53 points 1 week ago

it's not that they are "correct", it's that they are a close enough approximation to work well enough at the scale they're used. it's not like the universe runs on math.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 126 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of problems in the world can be attributed to people who think "if I don't understand something, it must be because the experts saying it are all wrong".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 121 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A genderino sounds more like something you'd find in particle physics than biology anyway

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 1 week ago

Considering the names of the types of quarks, I recommend renaming them genderinos.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

finally, we found what genderfluid is made from

[–] Una@europe.pub 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Physicists are freaky, like who was out there going and asking quarks what is their power dynamic in sex?

[–] jimmux@programming.dev 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"I'm a charm in the streets, and a strange in the sheets."

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

I'm down for a strap on, but what is a glue on??

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago (18 children)

though the meme is cool, gender isn't particularly a biology (or 'advance biology') thing. biology deals with sexes, their expressions and functionalities. gender is more of a personal and social concept but often related to sex characteristics (cis).

and yes, advanced biology tells sex determination isn't as easy as XX or XY or even looking at genitals like a creep.

and oh, for giggles consider fungi :)

[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Adding to this: XX and XY works for mammals, but not for other vertebrates (fish, birds, reptiles, amphibians). Birds and reptiles have Z and W chromosomes, and unlike in mammals where females are homozygotes, males in these groups are homozygotes. Some reptiles have temperature dependent sex determination, where ambient temperature above some value will produce males or females (depends on species). Some reptiles are composed entirely of females.

Some fish will straight up change sexes depending on age and male-female ratio in a social group.

In other groups it's not even different chromosomes but simply copy number of specific genes.

Plants can do all sorts of whacky things like produce seeds and pollen in the same individual.

Fungi are an entirely different cluster fuck because they have mating types which are not simple binaries.

Eukaryotic sex determination isn't a binary and it isn't even a nicely categorizable spectrum. It's a grab-bag of whatever doesn't perma-fuck your genome.

Source: me, I'm a biologist. Though admittedly I work on animals so my understanding of fungi and plant stuff is fuzzy at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (6 children)

https://xkcd.com/435/

I would say gender is probably centered about around psychology, ranges mostly from sociology to biology, with a just little bit going into chemistry

maybe like

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago

Slime mold(which is not a mold or fungi) looks around nervously in it's 13 different sexes.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago (13 children)

i think that if more people were exposed to advanced math there would be a reactionary trend of people going around and asking mathematicians “what is a number?”

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Advanced mathematicians see a numeric digit and ask "what's that?"

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

sort of like the reactionary trend of pulling your kids out of school because Common Core has changed how math is taught so critical thinking and conceptual understanding is incorporated, rather than teaching math by rote memorization?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 104 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I'm a career physicist, and I honestly have no idea what a state of matter is anymore.

[–] la508@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can I offer you a nice smectic B3 liquid crystal in this trying time?

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

You may not.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yeah i have a bachelor's in chemistry and I remember a professor earnestly saying the phrase "metallic phase nitrogen" and I think I went home and stared at the ceiling for an hour

load more comments (2 replies)

An abstraction used for grouping kinds of things together for the purposes of making thinking about them a lot faster.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I would wager you have more of an idea of what a state of matter is than biologists do of what a species is. Humans like to put things into neat boxes but nature is under no deal obligation to cooperate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gjoel@programming.dev 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly, people would probably object more to advanced math than advanced biology if they were exposed as much to it. Or basic math. Or elementary math...

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 52 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Math is extremely irrational.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Math is not real sometimes. Imaginary, even.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 1 week ago

If certain people could almost understand they would be very upset

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So true and it's a great to remind them of that sort of thing.

You know, you'd think all of the people who say it's purely down to genetics would be natural allies with, you know, molecular biologists (applied genetics). They'd be all like "it's a Y chromosome or nothing" and the biologists would be all like "yeah chromosomes!" because we fucking love chromosomes but no. In fact, it's noticeably absent when you start to think about it.

I wonder why that might be?

The short answer is "because it's infinitely more complicated than that."

Just because you carry the genetic code for anything at all, it doesn't mean you'll express it. The default setting for our DNA is off. So, if something isn't telling it to transcribe, it won't do it. A whole load of reasons could cause that, even before we get to mutations and partial expression or chimeras etc.

Anyway, what i mean is yeah, this meme!

Edit: also, don't beleive the AI. Early fetuses are female, until the Y is activated. You could have an inactivated Y and the fetus could be a woman capable of having children. The default setting is female, not intersex. It could be either but unless a specific event happens, it will always be female. It's a subtle but important difference. This means that all fetuses are female and then turn into a male.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bigot: "trans people aren't natrual according to science!!"

Scientist: "we've learned that trans people are natrual and this has helped us broaden our understanding of gender and human psychology"

Bigot: "stfu!! >:c

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Moving the goal posts sure does make sense!!!!

load more comments
view more: next ›