undergroundoverground

Im pretty sure I said "the point of it and not that it was 100% ready to go now.

Also, no one thinks advertising works on them. So, I'm sure you don't believe it 👍

Sure, they do it all on merit now instead!

It hasn't changed.

What if the point of AI is to have it create a personal model for each of us, using the vast amounts of our data they have access to, in order to manipulate us into buying and doing whatever the people who own it want but they can't just come out and say that?

Why? There's no friction in space and a sphere is an inefficient use of space

Well, reddit doesn't want to discourage nazis from posting and spreading their hate, it would seem.

This is an example of resistance as culture. It might be a small act but it demonstrates the point.

I think that's something that could work. Things like fashion to mess with facial recognition. Movies or tasks to mess with our algorithms. Distracting facsists with a flag. Culturally, capitalism feeds on the creativity of leftists type people and always has done. We can't feed it anti-capitalism because that just feeds it. So, we have to make fucking with the machine the culture itself and offer something they never can: warmth, community and authenticity.

So true and it's a great to remind them of that sort of thing.

You know, you'd think all of the people who say it's purely down to genetics would be natural allies with, you know, molecular biologists (applied genetics). They'd be all like "it's a Y chromosome or nothing" and the biologists would be all like "yeah chromosomes!" because we fucking love chromosomes but no. In fact, it's noticeably absent when you start to think about it.

I wonder why that might be?

The short answer is "because it's infinitely more complicated than that."

Just because you carry the genetic code for anything at all, it doesn't mean you'll express it. The default setting for our DNA is off. So, if something isn't telling it to transcribe, it won't do it. A whole load of reasons could cause that, even before we get to mutations and partial expression or chimeras etc.

Anyway, what i mean is yeah, this meme!

Edit: also, don't beleive the AI. Early fetuses are female, until the Y is activated. You could have an inactivated Y and the fetus could be a woman capable of having children. The default setting is female, not intersex. It could be either but unless a specific event happens, it will always be female. It's a subtle but important difference. This means that all fetuses are female and then turn into a male.

I don't disagree with what you're said but I'm not saying that they have the same age or that the ultimate origin doesn't go back further.

The point is that nothing brings home reality of the top bleeding the bottom dry, in all its forms, better than an undying blood sucking parasite, that gains extra life from your dead labour (excess to what you need for a reasonable life etc.). What you're forced to do, but not for the community or pensions, hospitals. Just to make someone else richer, for doing no work.

No worries, I'm sure done worse this week alone.

Yeah, Koine Greek is common Greek, at the time. In my defense, its unlikely that they would've called it ancient Greek back then 😁.

So, to me, it i would figure that he would've spoken common Greek, in the way they use English in India, back in the days of the British empire. Of course, there's no way to be sure of that. Either way, anything approaching primary documents would've been in Greek, to a point where it might not even matter what language Jesus actually used.

I imagine AI's use will be to use the vast amounts of data we all have collected on us to manipulate us into buying things and never leaving our screens.

The problem is, it's not something you really want to advertise and it's not viable unless you're someone like skynet. I mean Google, sorry.

Still, vampires remain one of the best critiques of capitalism we have available.

Okay, so, I'll try again, which bit is the part where I said the subject was bullshit? From the looks of it, it does seem as though you just made it up and argued against that, instead of what I said.

Interesting that you left out the part where I said it was always good enough all along thought. Then again, I guess that part does really shit all over the nonses you're spewing doesn't it?

At this point I'm concerned that you genuinely can't tell the difference between the words I used and "all economics is bullshit."