this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
312 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

75263 readers
4834 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's my network. I control what does or does not go through it.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, I was fully expecting Ron Swanson there.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just because I like that gif too:

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

LOL That is also appropriate but I meant the one where he chucks his computer in the garbage.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just because you didn't actually share it:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

It has never even occurred to me that it might not be okay to block ads on connections or devices that I own -- or even those that I don't, for that matter.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 month ago

Still true a decade later.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?

Robbing corporations is based, though, actually.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?

No. Find a way to make money that doesn't require showing ads online if you have a problem with it.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah. I don't have a contract with the site, agreeing to pay them in any way, shape or form. They voluntarily show me their content, but that does not obligate me to also accept their ads.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

It's not like these ads have any respect.

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 month ago

I think all ads should be blocked. If billions in funding is going to be put to use it should go towards offsetting environmental impact and developing products that are actually better, instead of just convincing people to settle for a cute jingle

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The same reason why it is ok to not eat shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here's why it's okay to block ads in pretty simple terms:

Ads can contain ransomware; that is to say, a seemingly innocent ad can deliver a payload which will run on your computer, lock your files, and demand you pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars anonymously.

Now if you go to the website that served the ad and tell them, "I allowed ads on your site because I support your right to monetise your content, and now I have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars, will you help me pay that" or "will you pay that for me since your site served the ransomware," you know what they will tell you, every single time, without fail? Whether they actually answer you, or more likely, just delete your email. They're telling you that it's your problem. That you should have secured your computer better.

So secure your computer better now. Block all the ads.

Getting a little more technical, use Firefox or a fork of it. Use Linux if you can. Use a Mac if you can't. If you really must use Windows, know how to secure it. I use Windows 11 at work, I'd never use it at home, but I had a talk with the IT guy, and he let me do a few things to it. I know more than he does, but he's the one with the job, so I told him what I'd do before I did it, I did exactly what I said I was going to do, nothing more nothing less, and I still think my home computer is more secure, but I'm a lot less worried about using the work machine. I think it's wild that so many companies just use Windows. I'm not trying to hate on Windows. It's good for gaming and it's accessible. I'd love to see more companies roll their own *nix or just use Macs (which run macOS which is UNIX certified).

[–] timroerstroem@feddit.dk 22 points 1 month ago

Here's why it's okay to block ads in even simpler terms: It's my fucking computer.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Advertising should be illegal. It should be considered harassment.

If you want people to find your product then we need to log that in a public database site. If you want to find a product go there, nobody ever wants to find a product while driving or watching movies or existing in public.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I agree, it's just a net negative for the world.

If nobody advertised, the world would be better off

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I have a personal rule to never buy from brands that harass me by spamming annoying ads left and right.

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can't believe people actually pay for branded clothing. I avoid branded clothing like the plague. If companies like Nike actually want someone to walk around plastered with their brand on them they should be paying them.

But companies have convinced people to pay enormous amounts of money to wear their brand as a "style" or as "self-expression". Just wow.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Leave my star trek branded clothing alone, I want a better future!

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Star Trek branded clothing excluded.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

living adfree is so great. sometimes it's jarring to hear an ad in the wild, but it's a nice reminder of how much better I'm living

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I do not understand how anyone uses mobile apps with ads. thats just so dystopian to me

[–] Devmapall@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I was watching some TV with friend. Show on prime and on Hulu.

Both had ads. Granted they were far less than actual television is but I do not miss ads at all. They really spoil the experience. Especially for a paid service.

[–] Teal@piefed.zip 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’re unnecessary, distracting, some try to track you and others can have malware. No thanks.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"some". more like 99.9999999% of them

[–] Teal@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Accurate. I was trying to leave room so not to say all of them but I see you left just enough and that works too. :)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

Because even US secret services (multiple of them) say so.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

It's my computer isn't it? I can discard packets I don't care to receive

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine

[–] lime@feddit.nu 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

there were so many fucking ads online in the late 90s

and you couldn't block them because they were either served from the same domain or used the same plugin as the content and it was an all-or-nothing thing

all those goddamn blinking gifs with "click here" and "you're our millionth visitor", and the pop-ups, and the flash bars with "shoot the ducks"...

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

a lot of those came up in the late 90s early 2000s though. the early 90s were mostly just text based pages.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yeah, but as soon as the web actually had enough traffic to take off the ads were everywhere. before 1996 it was basically just a prototype.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

considering that "web 2.0" is widely accepted to be "the social web", where the focus was on user contribution and interoperability... no.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

maybe i'm getting my html versions mixed up with my buzzwords

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 month ago

yeah i think that's about the same time. there are so many versions at the same time that it gets confusing

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There were ads! But these were simple banner graphics of 468x60 pixels. In the worst case it was an animated GIF. But hosted on the same server as the page and without any tracking shenanigans.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I remember the add that made me install my first add blocker. It stated playing the sound of knocking on glass and a voice going "Hey You!". With a looped videoof some guy waving at me.

Every so often one gets through my blocker and they have only gotten more annoying.

[–] jawa21@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, people seem to have mostly forgotten about the forced audio playback that was really prevalent for a while. It was crazy effective because you would have to hint down the actual ad causing the issue on the page to stop it.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I remember the add that made me install my first add blocker. It stated playing the sound of knocking on glass and a voice going "Hey You!". With a looped videoof some guy waving at me.

I have a similar story. People were fine with ads until they got too obnoxious and intrusive, and now the people making the obnoxious intrusive ads are crying that people are blocking them.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

That's before it got colonized by megacorporations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

It would be much harder to block ads if they were more like newspapers and just a part of the page you were viewing, instead of imported from a different source.

But in order to do that the site themselves would be responsible for the ads they display instead of blaming their ad service, and they would lose out on all their tracking data.

So fuck em.

[–] xep@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago

"It's my ccomputer" has already been mentioned, but it's my bandwidth and my home network too. Ads can stay off it.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It arbitrary pollutes any environment it’s conducted in, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising insecure hoarding of private information with the intent to better target individuals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maladvertising and scams just make that a surefire thing, especially since there's a chance that just loading an ad could infect your machine.

And for less tech-savvy family members, it cuts down on the risk of them falling for scams or suchlike.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Ad-blocking is as legal as a lock on the door.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used ad blocker but I cannot imagine a world without ads. What does discoverablity look like in a world without ads?

I think ads have the same issue as content recommendation algo, that being that they're bad but useful.

[–] glog78@digitalcourage.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

@Auth @floofloof
IMHO: Advertisment is another word for recommendation. While advertisment is seen as bad a recomendation isn't.

So what advertisment never made happen is making themself usefull to the consumer. Most consumer want maybe a !!! usefull recommendation !!! but not someone trying to force you to buy a certain product.

So what was the time before ads ... it never existet ... even before tv radio had advertisment. Even back in this day people hated the advertisment and did music recordings cutting the advertisment and talking out.

Some old people might remember press record ... press stop ... rewind a little bit ... and all of this.

The alternative was to pay alot of money for music ...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›