WhyJiffie

joined 2 years ago
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

sorry, I think I was wrong. signal/molly only attaches that information to a contact when it already has the phone number that they use for signal.

so unless you keep your phone number visible on signal, or you share your phone number in another way, this shouldn't be a problem.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

External Accessibility - Facebook can be accessed on multiple devices, by people who are not tech-conscious.

External accessibility is actually shit. you won't have access to even read most content without an account.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

What if you want a cookie, but not enough to go to the grocery store and buy some cookies?

I fixed that for you:

What if you want a cookie, but not enough to go to the grocery store and buy some cookies, after showing your ID card for its number to be written up?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

what competitors? competitors to AI as a technology?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

not even that. when setting up their first smartphone, either them or their parents just accept to create a google account

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

I don't think so. way too many people approve sensitive permissions and cookie tracking without a thought, and even more just go for a gmail account no matter what

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

living in denial does not help mutch.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

check your contacts app before stating such things. I'm not stating that signal sends your data to facebook and such, but that signal is registering info into the OS for convenience, that will also he visible to other apps with the privilege granted, including those of facebook

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

they have. they are mapping your social graph and with that the places you are possibly frequenting

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Which is why I don't give anyone my phone number.

fun fact: its worse than that! its not only about your phone number. signal and almost every chat app exposes your chat partners in the system contacts database. It's handy for the contacts app to be showing the list of chat apps usable for someone you know. at the minimum your name and profile picture that you set for yourself will be there and accessible to any apps with contacts permission, and in signal (even the molly fork) if that partner has made their phone number visible, that will be saved here too. and you can't really turn it off for others.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

normalization is the point, and harvesting data, not actual safety in any way

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

normalization is the point, and harvesting data, not actual safety in any way

302
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
 

lemm.ee has shut down at 00:14 UTC.

unfortunately I realized too late that I have had hundreds of saved links to posts and comments from there, so I did not have enough time to save them, but anyways it is interesting that maybe a third of the post links I could try were dead. I think linkrot is happening much faster here than on reddit, even if just counting deleted posts.

 

In today's episode of Kill The Messenger, Matrix co-founder Matthew Hodgson reveals how full of bullshit is the writer of the original article.

The messages were published in the Office of the Matrix.org Foundation room: https://matrix.to/#%2F%21sWpnrYUMmaBrlqfRdn%3Amatrix.org%2F%24XpQe-vmtB7j0Uy1TPCvMVCSCW63Xxw_jwy3fflw7EMQ%3Fvia=matrix.org&via=element.io

https://paper.wf/alexia/matrix-is-cooked is fascinatingly incorrect

Until the 6th of November 2023 when they—in their words—moved to a different repository and to the AGPL license. In reality, the Foundation did not know this was coming, and a huge support net was pulled away under their feet.

fwiw, the Foundation had a front-row seat in the fact that Element (as incorporated by the folks who created Matrix) had donated $$M to the Foundation over the years, but wasn't going to survive if it kept giving all its work away as apache-licensed code - which in turn would have been catastrophic for the Foundation.

Yes, the high expenses for the Matrix.org homeserver are largely because they are still managed by Element, just not as donated work but instead like with any other customer.

nope, Element passes the hardware costs (and a fraction of the people costs) of running the matrix.org server to the Foundation without any overheads or markup at all.

Either way it shows that Element is seemingly cashing in on selling ,Matrix to governments and B2B as a SaaS solution without it going back to the foundation

Element has literally put tens of millions into the foundation, and is continuing to do so - while some of the costs get passed to the Foundation, Element donates a bunch too (e.g. by funding a large chunk of the Matrix conference as the anchor sponsor, and by donating time all over the place to help support trust & safety etc)

At the same time I can't help but think that this could have been prevented. Even Matthew himself recognizes that putting the future on Matrix on the line with VC funding and alike was not the best idea for the health of Matrix.

No, even Matthew knows that Matrix would never have been funded without routing the VC funding from Element into... building Matrix. We tried to fund it originally purely as a non-profit, but failed (just as it's a nightmare to raise non-profit for the Foundation today even now that Matrix exists and is successful!). If you need to raise serious $ for an ambitious project, you either need to get lucky with a billionaire (as Signal did with Brian Acton) or you have to raise on the for-profit side. Perhaps it would have have been best for Matrix to grow organically, but I suspect that if it did, it would have failed miserably - instead, it succeeded because we already had a team of ~12 people who could crack on and jump-start it if they could work on it as their dayjob; the team who subsequently founded Element.

Ultimately, for-profit companies will do what makes them profit, not what's the best option. Unless the best option happens to coincide with making the most profit.

No, Element is not profitable. Nor is it trying to maximise profit. Right now it's trying to survive and get sustainable and profit-neutral (i.e. break-even) - while doing everything it can to help keep Matrix healthy and successful too (given if Matrix fails, Element fails too).

Unfortunately, supporting the foundation through anything more than “in spirit” and a platinum membership is out of their budget, apparently. I think that morally they owe a lot more than that.

wow.

the FUD level is absolutely astonishing, and I really wonder what the genesis of this is

so, absolutely, spectacularly, depressing

this, my friends, is why we can't have nice things.

In response to an other person suggesting that the publisher is also known as a reasonable person on the platform:

Interesting, the matrix handle that seems behind this blog seems always to have been quite a reasonable person

somewhat why i’m wondering what the backstory is, and whether this is an unfortunate example of spicy lies outpacing the boring truth

 

If your post would end up like that in a day, please just refrain from posting it, in any community, or use a throwaway. It is very destructive, especially since all and every comment also becomes unreachable with it.

Sincerely,
With all due respect,
Your Lemmy neighbor


I'm fed up with this shit, and I know it well that it's not just me.

Do not bomb your communities, please.

I promise, I'll end up setting up a public instance that does not obey any deletions because of these madlads. Seriously, where is pushshift for lemmy?

view more: next ›